![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() While preflighting the Arrow yesterday afternoon I watched a C172 pull up through the tiedown T right next to me. Not sure why he didn't stop right at the chains. Instead, he pulled ahead and stopped. As he was beginning to push the airplane back, the other FBO C172 darted in from behind and took the first guy's parking spot like it was a friggin' shopping mall parking lot at Christmas. So, for a second, while I watched, one pilot was pushing his airplane back, toward the other, who was moving up on his tail at greater than walking speek with his engine running. When his prop stopped about 2 feet from the first airplane's tail. To the immediate right of the airplanes was the other FBO tiedown spot, which was perfect empty, because that's where the 2nd aircraft was normally tied down. The pilot of the first plane decided to walk off his anger. The pilot of the second acted absolutely oblivious, as if it was the other guy's fault for almost pushing his airplane back into the guy's prop. He just shrugged the whole incident off and went about his business. No harm, no foul. Another pilot came along a bit later and helped the first pilot drag the airplane to the empty spot right next to them. Here's the catch: The FBO owner explicitly forbids taxiing in from the back because of clearance issues. Specifically, because a newly-minted private pilot had tried to hotrod the 172 into the tiedown a couple of months ago and banged wings with the other 172. The damage was between spars, so the repair was $900 and some Bondo. Three weeks ago his instructor was terminated for doing the SAME THING, except, fortunately, he didn't hit the wing. Made such a racket jockeying the brakes and the throttle between airplanes, though, that people complained. It turns out the pilot who had the collision had done nearly the same thing returning from his checkride...except, fortunately, the other plane was a transient Bonanza. DURING THIS GUY'S CHECKRIDE, his wingtip passed right over the Bonanza's, and he PASSED. So in the last couple of months I've seen four people not just break the FBO policy, but taxi like idiots all but parallel parking their airplanes around others, and near prop-strike that would have showered me with debris, and both of the FBO Cessnas scratched or dented by a guy who nearly collided with a Bonanza while passing his checkride. WTF is going on here?! And how can you even pass a checkride if your wing passes over the wing of a parked aircraft? The fellow who runs the FBO is a retired cop, mayor and career Marine. He's gonna blow a gasket when he hears about it, but I believe it's my duty to report what I saw almost happen to his airplanes. Thoughts? -c |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "gatt" wrote in message ... While preflighting the Arrow yesterday afternoon I watched a C172 pull up through the tiedown T right next to me. Not sure why he didn't stop right at the chains. Instead, he pulled ahead and stopped. As he was beginning to push the airplane back, the other FBO C172 darted in from behind and took the first guy's parking spot like it was a friggin' shopping mall parking lot at Christmas. So, for a second, while I watched, one pilot was pushing his airplane back, toward the other, who was moving up on his tail at greater than walking speek with his engine running. When his prop stopped about 2 feet from the first airplane's tail. To the immediate right of the airplanes was the other FBO tiedown spot, which was perfect empty, because that's where the 2nd aircraft was normally tied down. The pilot of the first plane decided to walk off his anger. The pilot of the second acted absolutely oblivious, as if it was the other guy's fault for almost pushing his airplane back into the guy's prop. He just shrugged the whole incident off and went about his business. No harm, no foul. Another pilot came along a bit later and helped the first pilot drag the airplane to the empty spot right next to them. Here's the catch: The FBO owner explicitly forbids taxiing in from the back because of clearance issues. Specifically, because a newly-minted private pilot had tried to hotrod the 172 into the tiedown a couple of months ago and banged wings with the other 172. The damage was between spars, so the repair was $900 and some Bondo. Three weeks ago his instructor was terminated for doing the SAME THING, except, fortunately, he didn't hit the wing. Made such a racket jockeying the brakes and the throttle between airplanes, though, that people complained. It turns out the pilot who had the collision had done nearly the same thin g returning from his checkride...except, fortunately, the other plane was a transient Bonanza. DURING THIS GUY'S CHECKRIDE, his wingtip passed right over the Bonanza's, and he PASSED. So in the last couple of months I've seen four people not just break the FBO policy, but taxi like idiots all but parallel parking their airplanes around others, and near prop-strike that would have showered me with debris, and both of the FBO Cessnas scratched or dented by a guy who nearly collided with a Bonanza while passing his checkride. WTF is going on here?! And how can you even pass a checkride if your wing passes over the wing of a parked aircraft? The fellow who runs the FBO is a retired cop, mayor and career Marine. He's gonna blow a gasket when he hears about it, but I believe it's my duty to report what I saw almost happen to his airplanes. Thoughts? -c Gorge Winds ramp is large enough it would take a very unsafe pilot to bang something up or even hit another airplane. I would contact the pilot and have a discussion with them about it first remind them of the rules and tell them that if you see it happen again it will be brought to Gorge Winds attention. If the pilot don't understand or is unresponsive, rude then yes bring it to attention Gorge Winds because I would not want that fellow taxiing near my airplane and if they keep damaging the aircraft the rates you will pay will go up. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "NW_PILOT" wrote in message news:X7Kdnae5mqN- Gorge Winds ramp is large enough it would take a very unsafe pilot to bang something up or even hit another airplane. Plus, every FBO airplane there has a spot reserved for it. The guy could have simply pulled into the one from which he took the airplane instead of taking the spot the other fellow was already pushing his plane into. Crazy. The owner's on vacation but since my first post I've learned that at least two of the instructors saw it happen, so I think there's going to be some attention given to the incident anyhow. -c |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() gatt wrote: snip WTF is going on here?! And how can you even pass a checkride if your wing passes over the wing of a parked aircraft? I don't think that is specifically against any rules. Often times while parking I'll manuever my (low) wing underneath the wing of a neighboring Cessna. Of course, I'm just not tearing willy-nilly into a parking space without regard to other airplanes or people. I do it slowly and carefully. That said, it sounds like the FBO has instituted these rules for a good reason (tight parking, foot traffic). If people are regularly breaking the rule and causing the problems you described, I'd certainly bring it up with the FBO management. Perhaps they need to emphasize the rule a bit more and spell out some penalties. It sounds like they might not have spread the word in a strong enough manner. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:03:38 -0800, "gatt"
wrote: While preflighting the Arrow yesterday afternoon I watched a C172 pull up through the tiedown T right next to me. Not sure why he didn't stop right at the chains. Instead, he pulled ahead and stopped. As he was beginning to push the airplane back, the other FBO C172 darted in from behind and took the first guy's parking spot like it was a friggin' shopping mall parking lot at Christmas. snip The fellow who runs the FBO is a retired cop, mayor and career Marine. He's gonna blow a gasket when he hears about it, but I believe it's my duty to report what I saw almost happen to his airplanes. Thoughts? Rather than bust the pilots (although it sounds like the 2nd C172 pilot was an idiot) - can you address the root of the problem so that it doesn't happen anymore in the future? I am having a difficult time visualizing the ramp setup... But, would it be possible to paint diagonal yellow stripes behind the tiedown to indicate that the area is not to be traversed. For an aviation sense of humor, how about a hold short line behind the tiedown? Having said this, people are lazy, and will always cut corners. And it is hard to legislate against stupidity. Last summer, we had a transient taxi off the parallel taxiway, across the grass to pull directly into a tiedown on the edge of the ramp. The tiedown is next to a fuel farm and there are concrete posts to protect/prevent against wingtips hitting the pump. The transient Cessna hit the concrete post, and the wing was badly damaged. The pilot ranted at the FBO staff and promised to sue them for damages because the FBO told him (via radio) to park in that spot. Of course, the FBO never told him to skip the taxiway to the ramp and cut across the grass... -Nathan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So what's the big deal of a high wing passing over a low wing? "gatt" wrote in message ... It turns out the pilot who had the collision had done nearly the same thing returning from his checkride...except, fortunately, the other plane was a transient Bonanza. DURING THIS GUY'S CHECKRIDE, his wingtip passed right over the Bonanza's, and he PASSED. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gatt" wrote in message
... "NW_PILOT" wrote in message news:X7Kdnae5mqN- Gorge Winds ramp is large enough it would take a very unsafe pilot to bang something up or even hit another airplane. Plus, every FBO airplane there has a spot reserved for it. The guy could have simply pulled into the one from which he took the airplane instead of taking the spot the other fellow was already pushing his plane into. Crazy. The owner's on vacation but since my first post I've learned that at least two of the instructors saw it happen, so I think there's going to be some attention given to the incident anyhow. -c If the instructors are in the employ of the FBO.. and they don't say something... around here they'd be fired for not doing their job. Personally, if you have a good relationship with the FBO.. have a closed door... I'm nervous about the operations around here because.. I could get roped into the next guys accident if I was preflighting or parking and he hit me... and end it with... It's something I think you ought to know.. I enjoy flying your planes... but these guys out here don't follow your rules and I'm not sure they don't do the same in the air and may overstress something and I get a broke plane and don't know it. but that's jsut my 2c BT |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll buy all of your argument except the rant about high wing/low wing. Done
it many times without swapping paint. Can't imagine a DE getting upset about it. Bob Gardner "gatt" wrote in message ... While preflighting the Arrow yesterday afternoon I watched a C172 pull up through the tiedown T right next to me. Not sure why he didn't stop right at the chains. Instead, he pulled ahead and stopped. As he was beginning to push the airplane back, the other FBO C172 darted in from behind and took the first guy's parking spot like it was a friggin' shopping mall parking lot at Christmas. So, for a second, while I watched, one pilot was pushing his airplane back, toward the other, who was moving up on his tail at greater than walking speek with his engine running. When his prop stopped about 2 feet from the first airplane's tail. To the immediate right of the airplanes was the other FBO tiedown spot, which was perfect empty, because that's where the 2nd aircraft was normally tied down. The pilot of the first plane decided to walk off his anger. The pilot of the second acted absolutely oblivious, as if it was the other guy's fault for almost pushing his airplane back into the guy's prop. He just shrugged the whole incident off and went about his business. No harm, no foul. Another pilot came along a bit later and helped the first pilot drag the airplane to the empty spot right next to them. Here's the catch: The FBO owner explicitly forbids taxiing in from the back because of clearance issues. Specifically, because a newly-minted private pilot had tried to hotrod the 172 into the tiedown a couple of months ago and banged wings with the other 172. The damage was between spars, so the repair was $900 and some Bondo. Three weeks ago his instructor was terminated for doing the SAME THING, except, fortunately, he didn't hit the wing. Made such a racket jockeying the brakes and the throttle between airplanes, though, that people complained. It turns out the pilot who had the collision had done nearly the same thing returning from his checkride...except, fortunately, the other plane was a transient Bonanza. DURING THIS GUY'S CHECKRIDE, his wingtip passed right over the Bonanza's, and he PASSED. So in the last couple of months I've seen four people not just break the FBO policy, but taxi like idiots all but parallel parking their airplanes around others, and near prop-strike that would have showered me with debris, and both of the FBO Cessnas scratched or dented by a guy who nearly collided with a Bonanza while passing his checkride. WTF is going on here?! And how can you even pass a checkride if your wing passes over the wing of a parked aircraft? The fellow who runs the FBO is a retired cop, mayor and career Marine. He's gonna blow a gasket when he hears about it, but I believe it's my duty to report what I saw almost happen to his airplanes. Thoughts? -c |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() OK, how about something like this... Tell the owner about the incident you saw, express your concern about damage to aircraft and safety in general. If he demands to know the identity of the pilots involved, tell him and let him handle it. Otherwise, suggest a bulletin board posting or better yet a letter sent to all club members/renters with something like 'in the past few weeks...several safety and courtesy issues have arisen...', spell out some rules for the club/FBO regarding taxiing and parking, and end it with '..any pilot reported violating these safety rules will have membership/renter status revoked immediately'. Basically, ship up or ship out. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ditto that.
"Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... I'll buy all of your argument except the rant about high wing/low wing. Done it many times without swapping paint. Can't imagine a DE getting upset about it. Bob Gardner |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
molding plexiglas websites? | [email protected] | Owning | 44 | February 17th 05 09:33 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
Report blames pilots in crash of two Navy jets | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 26th 03 01:27 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Senator asks Navy for report on pilot | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 17th 03 10:08 PM |