![]()  | 
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. | 
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
I have been working on a biplane flying boat (similar to some in the 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	early 1900s). Rough weight estimates a fuselage/tail/controls 200, Rotax 503/5Gal fuel 150, wings 150, me 225 = 725 gross. The reason for the biplane configuration is for the large wing area (250sq.ft) I feel will be needed to get off the water. Any opinion on whether this will work? Perhaps I could get by with less wing area? I would also like tandem seating if the design can handle the extra weight. Brock  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| canard flying boat | Darrel Toepfer | Home Built | 14 | October 19th 15 08:37 AM | 
| Art - 'RAAF Sunderland flying boat attacking U-Boat' Dennis Adams 1967 | Dave Kearton[_3_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | June 12th 09 06:56 AM | 
| H-16 flying boat | Terry M[_3_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | May 18th 08 04:35 AM | 
| FLYING BOAT FESTIVAL International | Dave[_8_] | Home Built | 0 | February 14th 07 04:01 PM | 
| sunderland flying boat (origin of the name) | Edward Senft | Military Aviation | 18 | February 11th 04 02:31 AM |