![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have you ever noticed the lack of images on glider manufactures web sites? Especially cockpit and closeups. Sure they have a few of the gliders flying, but auto manufactures have detailed images and even 360 cameras and the autos cost less then a quarter as much. Yeah I know there is more auto competition and many more people buying autos, but with glider manufactures going after a smaller number of people I would think they would wow a potential buyer with detailed images. And it is all manufactures and not just web its also their downloadable brochures as well. I suppose I may have missed some images buried in their web sites but don't you think they should be up front and readily seen? I don't think at this point in the game any manufacture is going to change their tooling much to copy another manufacture.. And if so they probably would not go by a web image of a competitor. The only explanation I seem to come up with the lack of detailed, quality images is that they are too busy and selling all the gliders they can make. JS has a couple. And Schleicher has one of the better brochures, but has more of employees than cool looking shots of the interior and so forth. Schemp-Hirth has a new web site but lacking for images. DG has a lot of information on their site but its buried and still lacking current design wowing images. Most all the images on HPH site is of flying. Same for LAK. And many of the manufactures images look like the public sent them in. And a web site can not be any more generic than GP. Ironic that one of the smallest manufactures TST has images right on front page. Maybe the older, bigger manufactures know more than the large auto makers.
I hate to be busting on some of these manufactures that I drool over their gliders, but I hate to keep hearing that soaring is a dying sport or not as poplar as it once was. Well, don't you think manufactures should dazzle the public, potential buyers, or those that can afford a new glider ever so often, with better images and marketing? Maybe us glider pilots are more informed consumers than auto purchasing consumers and don't need the extra eye candy. Maybe auto purchasers make fickle purchases based on eye candy and then trade after a short time. Just wish I had more eye candy to view sometimes when its cold and rainy out. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:30:11 AM UTC-5, Casey wrote:
Have you ever noticed the lack of images on glider manufactures web sites? Especially cockpit and closeups. Sure they have a few of the gliders flying, but auto manufactures have detailed images and even 360 cameras and the autos cost less then a quarter as much. Yeah I know there is more auto competition and many more people buying autos, but with glider manufactures going after a smaller number of people I would think they would wow a potential buyer with detailed images. And it is all manufactures and not just web its also their downloadable brochures as well. I suppose I may have missed some images buried in their web sites but don't you think they should be up front and readily seen? I don't think at this point in the game any manufacture is going to change their tooling much to copy another manufacture. And if so they probably would not go by a web image of a competitor. The only explanation I seem to come up with the lack of detailed, quality images is that they are too busy and selling all the gliders they can make. JS has a couple. And Schleicher has one of the better brochures, but has more of employees than cool looking shots of the interior and so forth. Schemp-Hirth has a new web site but lacking for images. DG has a lot of information on their site but its buried and still lacking current design wowing images. Most all the images on HPH site is of flying. Same for LAK. And many of the manufactures images look like the public sent them in. And a web site can not be any more generic than GP. Ironic that one of the smallest manufactures TST has images right on front page. Maybe the older, bigger manufactures know more than the large auto makers. I hate to be busting on some of these manufactures that I drool over their gliders, but I hate to keep hearing that soaring is a dying sport or not as poplar as it once was. Well, don't you think manufactures should dazzle the public, potential buyers, or those that can afford a new glider ever so often, with better images and marketing? Maybe us glider pilots are more informed consumers than auto purchasing consumers and don't need the extra eye candy. Maybe auto purchasers make fickle purchases based on eye candy and then trade after a short time. Just wish I had more eye candy to view sometimes when its cold and rainy out. http://www.jonkersailplanes.co.za/instruments.htm http://www.alexander-schleicher.de/en/ http://www.schempp-hirth.com/en/sail...-2cxa-fes.html http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/index.p...dg-flugzeuge-d http://www.hph.cz/index.php?option=c...mid=56&lang=en http://lak.lt/index.php?option=com_c...5&Itemi d=140 http://alisport.com/eu/eng/galleryglobal.htm http://www.gliders-albastar.com/proj...der-as-13-5-m/ http://www.gpgliders.com http://www.lsa-gliders.com/html/tst-10_atlas.html Totally agree and the entire marketing effort of many manufactures is lacking from PR to events, inactive web sites and marketing automation. I think these companies are mostly engineers and simply go by the falsehood that "if you build it they will come". Dennis |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 10:18:34 AM UTC-5, HGXC wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:30:11 AM UTC-5, Casey wrote: Have you ever noticed the lack of images on glider manufactures web sites? Especially cockpit and closeups. Sure they have a few of the gliders flying, but auto manufactures have detailed images and even 360 cameras and the autos cost less then a quarter as much. Yeah I know there is more auto competition and many more people buying autos, but with glider manufactures going after a smaller number of people I would think they would wow a potential buyer with detailed images. And it is all manufactures and not just web its also their downloadable brochures as well. I suppose I may have missed some images buried in their web sites but don't you think they should be up front and readily seen? I don't think at this point in the game any manufacture is going to change their tooling much to copy another manufacture. And if so they probably would not go by a web image of a competitor. The only explanation I seem to come up with the lack of detailed, quality images is that they are too busy and selling all the gliders they can make.. JS has a couple. And Schleicher has one of the better brochures, but has more of employees than cool looking shots of the interior and so forth. Schemp-Hirth has a new web site but lacking for images. DG has a lot of information on their site but its buried and still lacking current design wowing images. Most all the images on HPH site is of flying. Same for LAK. And many of the manufactures images look like the public sent them in. And a web site can not be any more generic than GP. Ironic that one of the smallest manufactures TST has images right on front page. Maybe the older, bigger manufactures know more than the large auto makers. I hate to be busting on some of these manufactures that I drool over their gliders, but I hate to keep hearing that soaring is a dying sport or not as poplar as it once was. Well, don't you think manufactures should dazzle the public, potential buyers, or those that can afford a new glider ever so often, with better images and marketing? Maybe us glider pilots are more informed consumers than auto purchasing consumers and don't need the extra eye candy. Maybe auto purchasers make fickle purchases based on eye candy and then trade after a short time. Just wish I had more eye candy to view sometimes when its cold and rainy out. http://www.jonkersailplanes.co.za/instruments.htm http://www.alexander-schleicher.de/en/ http://www.schempp-hirth.com/en/sail...-2cxa-fes.html http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/index.p...dg-flugzeuge-d http://www.hph.cz/index.php?option=c...mid=56&lang=en http://lak.lt/index.php?option=com_c...5&Itemi d=140 http://alisport.com/eu/eng/galleryglobal.htm http://www.gliders-albastar.com/proj...der-as-13-5-m/ http://www.gpgliders.com http://www.lsa-gliders.com/html/tst-10_atlas.html Totally agree and the entire marketing effort of many manufactures is lacking from PR to events, inactive web sites and marketing automation. I think these companies are mostly engineers and simply go by the falsehood that "if you build it they will come". Dennis God help us all. You're right Dennis, these guys can't market their way out of a paper bag. It gets worse. I heard that Schleicher doesn't even have a proper telephone sanitizer on staff. And the hair! Look at these guys! http://tinyurl.com/jv4ym3t http://tinyurl.com/gskzr6q It's enough to make you think that maybe Earth *wasn't* colonized by the B-Ark, after all! What's the backlog at Schempp Hirth, Schleicher or Jonkers, again? :-) -Evan Ludeman / T8 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What's the backlog at Schempp Hirth, Schleicher or Jonkers, again? :-) -Evan Ludeman / T8 I suppose there is a lot to be said for custom work and not getting too big in order to stay busy enough to maintain a professional staff of craftsmen. But I have seen 2 new gliders with issues. One less than 6 months old and the other less than 12. Regardless, I would like to see more professional detailed images of new ships. Now I'm wondering how many people order ships without test flying that model, or seeing it in person, or actually comparing. Guess I will have to wait until next SSA Convention to put my order in. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read an article once about the differences between American everyday life and the rest of the world. It was mostly stupid stuff like warm beer and no refills on Coke, wall to wall carpeting, etc. One point I remember was marketing. In the 'States we're bombarded with massive amounts of media selling everything everywhere we go. They said as a result a third grader in the US could outsell most adults in Europe. Maybe we're expecting an American sales pitch from a European manufacturer?
I can tell you this much about those gliders...they're all likely phenomenal and I can't afford one. Besides the really smart old guys running my club at home have assured us all that 2-33's are outstanding gliders and the large dents in the leading edges are cosmetic only. DT |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Besides the really smart old guys running my club at home have assured us all that 2-33's are outstanding gliders and the large dents in the leading edges are cosmetic only". DT
That made me smile, as it is the exact same thing I have heard at my club. GX |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 10:46:17 AM UTC-5, Tango Eight wrote:
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 10:18:34 AM UTC-5, HGXC wrote: On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:30:11 AM UTC-5, Casey wrote: Have you ever noticed the lack of images on glider manufactures web sites? Especially cockpit and closeups. Sure they have a few of the gliders flying, but auto manufactures have detailed images and even 360 cameras and the autos cost less then a quarter as much. Yeah I know there is more auto competition and many more people buying autos, but with glider manufactures going after a smaller number of people I would think they would wow a potential buyer with detailed images. And it is all manufactures and not just web its also their downloadable brochures as well. I suppose I may have missed some images buried in their web sites but don't you think they should be up front and readily seen? I don't think at this point in the game any manufacture is going to change their tooling much to copy another manufacture. And if so they probably would not go by a web image of a competitor. The only explanation I seem to come up with the lack of detailed, quality images is that they are too busy and selling all the gliders they can make. JS has a couple. And Schleicher has one of the better brochures, but has more of employees than cool looking shots of the interior and so forth. Schemp-Hirth has a new web site but lacking for images. DG has a lot of information on their site but its buried and still lacking current design wowing images. Most all the images on HPH site is of flying. Same for LAK. And many of the manufactures images look like the public sent them in. And a web site can not be any more generic than GP. Ironic that one of the smallest manufactures TST has images right on front page. Maybe the older, bigger manufactures know more than the large auto makers. I hate to be busting on some of these manufactures that I drool over their gliders, but I hate to keep hearing that soaring is a dying sport or not as poplar as it once was. Well, don't you think manufactures should dazzle the public, potential buyers, or those that can afford a new glider ever so often, with better images and marketing? Maybe us glider pilots are more informed consumers than auto purchasing consumers and don't need the extra eye candy. Maybe auto purchasers make fickle purchases based on eye candy and then trade after a short time. Just wish I had more eye candy to view sometimes when its cold and rainy out. http://www.jonkersailplanes.co.za/instruments.htm http://www.alexander-schleicher.de/en/ http://www.schempp-hirth.com/en/sail...-2cxa-fes.html http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/index.p...dg-flugzeuge-d http://www.hph.cz/index.php?option=c...mid=56&lang=en http://lak.lt/index.php?option=com_c...5&Itemi d=140 http://alisport.com/eu/eng/galleryglobal.htm http://www.gliders-albastar.com/proj...der-as-13-5-m/ http://www.gpgliders.com http://www.lsa-gliders.com/html/tst-10_atlas.html Totally agree and the entire marketing effort of many manufactures is lacking from PR to events, inactive web sites and marketing automation. I think these companies are mostly engineers and simply go by the falsehood that "if you build it they will come". Dennis God help us all. You're right Dennis, these guys can't market their way out of a paper bag. It gets worse. I heard that Schleicher doesn't even have a proper telephone sanitizer on staff. And the hair! Look at these guys! http://tinyurl.com/jv4ym3t http://tinyurl.com/gskzr6q It's enough to make you think that maybe Earth *wasn't* colonized by the B-Ark, after all! What's the backlog at Schempp Hirth, Schleicher or Jonkers, again? :-) -Evan Ludeman / T8 Well Evan no I'm not looking for a job - ![]() I get it ...its a very small market but, I have worked in such small markets before and every win (sale) is precious and you never know what was the final factor that lead the customer away. When I bought my used Ventus ...I got pictures, Dan Johnson reviews sent, and he spent all day showcasing the glider to me and the staff at Williams was extremely helpful in supporting the private sale. I'm not expecting Proctor and Gamble here but from Pete's sake they are 250+k products and there are limited buyers for new gliders. Dennis |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you can afford a new glider, you can afford to visit the factory.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lack of ferry permit | J983 | General Aviation | 0 | November 22nd 14 11:04 PM |
"Sound" request of vario designers, manufactures, and dealers. | Ben[_4_] | Soaring | 2 | May 19th 10 03:28 AM |
lack of confidence solo flight | captainsj | Piloting | 21 | December 20th 05 10:59 AM |
How much lack of similarity in airliner flying? | Otis McNatt | General Aviation | 28 | October 2nd 04 03:20 PM |
Lack of power in Cessna 172-R | Chuck | Owning | 27 | February 19th 04 02:26 PM |