![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christmas is a-comin' etc. and I'm thinking of replacing my old A14 diluter
demand system with a Mountain High EDS system. The A14 hasn't been used for years; now I'm living in the mountains I want something I know I can trust Can I trust the EDS system? Anybody out there got anything good or bad to say about it? Should I swap my old steel bottle for a new one - if so, aloominum or kevlar? I like the idea of the canular - is it reliable? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Simon Waddell" wrote in message ... Christmas is a-comin' etc. and I'm thinking of replacing my old A14 diluter demand system with a Mountain High EDS system. The A14 hasn't been used for years; now I'm living in the mountains I want something I know I can trust Can I trust the EDS system? Anybody out there got anything good or bad to say about it? Should I swap my old steel bottle for a new one - if so, aloominum or kevlar? I like the idea of the canular - is it reliable? EDS is good, a freshly overhauled A-14 is better. With a good mask fit, the A-14 will keep your blood oxygen saturation at a steady 98-99% up to 40,000 feet. It's a safe and solid bit of equipment. I've never seen anything that good with a nasal cannula. Also there is cost. I hear that an A-14 can be overhauled for about $350 and the purchase price of an EDS is three times that. Below 18,000' a cannula is much more comfortable than the old olive drab masks, however Steel bottles are heavy but cheap. Aluminum and kevlar are light but very expensive. I guess it depends on what the overall W&B of your glider (and wallet) looks like. Bill Daniels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One other point related to bottles. With the aluminum and the steel you
can get them hydro tested at the prescribed intervals and they are basically not a life limited item. The composite bottles have a specified service life of about 10 years. After the 10ish year life (I think it's the DOT) says they are to be destroyed. Hopefully this life expecancy will be extended as they build up a succesful track record. Bill Daniels wrote: "Simon Waddell" wrote in message ... Christmas is a-comin' etc. and I'm thinking of replacing my old A14 diluter demand system with a Mountain High EDS system. The A14 hasn't been used for years; now I'm living in the mountains I want something I know I can trust Can I trust the EDS system? Anybody out there got anything good or bad to say about it? Should I swap my old steel bottle for a new one - if so, aloominum or kevlar? I like the idea of the canular - is it reliable? EDS is good, a freshly overhauled A-14 is better. With a good mask fit, the A-14 will keep your blood oxygen saturation at a steady 98-99% up to 40,000 feet. It's a safe and solid bit of equipment. I've never seen anything that good with a nasal cannula. Also there is cost. I hear that an A-14 can be overhauled for about $350 and the purchase price of an EDS is three times that. Below 18,000' a cannula is much more comfortable than the old olive drab masks, however Steel bottles are heavy but cheap. Aluminum and kevlar are light but very expensive. I guess it depends on what the overall W&B of your glider (and wallet) looks like. Bill Daniels |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Simon Waddell wrote:
Christmas is a-comin' etc. and I'm thinking of replacing my old A14 diluter demand system with a Mountain High EDS system. Go for it, you'll love it! One point: Theoretically, the cannula is even more efficient than a mask - as long as you make sure you're breathing through the nose! (This is the only reason why the manufactorer recommends a mask at altitude.) Stefan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Zivley" wrote in message ... One other point related to bottles. With the aluminum and the steel you can get them hydro tested at the prescribed intervals and they are basically not a life limited item. The composite bottles have a specified service life of about 10 years. After the 10ish year life (I think it's the DOT) says they are to be destroyed. Hopefully this life expecancy will be extended as they build up a succesful track record. I believe the life-limit term you're referring to is actually 15 years. But there are other differences - DOT requires steel bottles be hydro-tested every 5 years. Most composites need to be tested every 3. There are a few composite bottles (including the carbon fiber full wrap bottle I sell to other Stemme owners) that have a 5 year test interval. I haven't used an A14, but have used an older Oximizer cannula system and Mountain High's EDS. I much prefer the EDS. The EDS's calibrated pulse of O2 tends not to dry out nasal passages as much as the other and just feels better. O2 saturation remains acceptable higher than the 18 K the FAA considers the limit for cannula. -- bumper "Dare to be different . . . circle in sink." to reply, the last half is right to left --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Simon:
See my article on pulse oximeters and the EDS system in the Sept. issue of Southern California Soaring, the online newsletter of the Region 12 Soaring Council: http://www.socalsoaring.com Click on Sept 2003 issue. Regards, Jim |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You've touched on the shortcoming of the system. There is no
indication of actual flow to the mask (I am assuming the mask as the worst case). Red/Green indicators are worse than worthless because they may decrease the delivery. Use an pulse oximeter with the system. In article , "dusty" wrote: I have had occasional problems. My breathing does not always activate the sensor so that no squirt of oxygen is receive. I had the experience of flying most of the afternoon at over 17k and noticing toward the end that I felt like I had hypoxia. But I would take a breath and look at the EDS and get the green light so everything seemed ok. I do not hear too well at certain frequencies. But during the afternoon I kept hearing (barely) a buzzing. Finally I realized that my EDS was saying that there was a problem. After some investigation after landing, I realized that when I would 'check' the EDS by inhaling, the inhalation was slightly larger than my normal breathing. This would activate the EDS. My normal breathing does not always activate the EDS. Changing the cannulus and tubing seems to helps for the first time or two but then it begins not always noticing my inhalation. I do have to use a sleep apnea machinge. Maybe there is some relationship. Later I notice "Simon Waddell" wrote in message ... Christmas is a-comin' etc. and I'm thinking of replacing my old A14 diluter demand system with a Mountain High EDS system. The A14 hasn't been used for years; now I'm living in the mountains I want something I know I can trust Can I trust the EDS system? Anybody out there got anything good or bad to say about it? Should I swap my old steel bottle for a new one - if so, aloominum or kevlar? I like the idea of the canular - is it reliable? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You typically do not use a mask with an EDS its a canular based system.
If you breath out of you mouth then the EDS will not get the pressure change to fire off its next shot of O2 So in order to achive this you have to remember to exhale through your nose. The latest version of the EDS will sound a warning if you have not had a proper breathing cycle in X nunber of mins depending on your altitude. I suspect people earlier in this thread saying they do not have it work for them are exhaling by their mouths. Al "dennis brown" wrote in message ink.net... You've touched on the shortcoming of the system. There is no indication of actual flow to the mask (I am assuming the mask as the worst case). Red/Green indicators are worse than worthless because they may decrease the delivery. Use an pulse oximeter with the system. In article , "dusty" wrote: I have had occasional problems. My breathing does not always activate the sensor so that no squirt of oxygen is receive. I had the experience of flying most of the afternoon at over 17k and noticing toward the end that I felt like I had hypoxia. But I would take a breath and look at the EDS and get the green light so everything seemed ok. I do not hear too well at certain frequencies. But during the afternoon I kept hearing (barely) a buzzing. Finally I realized that my EDS was saying that there was a problem. After some investigation after landing, I realized that when I would 'check' the EDS by inhaling, the inhalation was slightly larger than my normal breathing. This would activate the EDS. My normal breathing does not always activate the EDS. Changing the cannulus and tubing seems to helps for the first time or two but then it begins not always noticing my inhalation. I do have to use a sleep apnea machinge. Maybe there is some relationship. Later I notice "Simon Waddell" wrote in message ... Christmas is a-comin' etc. and I'm thinking of replacing my old A14 diluter demand system with a Mountain High EDS system. The A14 hasn't been used for years; now I'm living in the mountains I want something I know I can trust Can I trust the EDS system? Anybody out there got anything good or bad to say about it? Should I swap my old steel bottle for a new one - if so, aloominum or kevlar? I like the idea of the canular - is it reliable? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What you are saying makes sense. As I have gotten older I have gotten more
hay fever. I may be breath a little through my mouth now to compensate for partially blocked nostrils. When I check the EDS, I may subconsciously 'shape up' and do it right. "Al" wrote in message ... You typically do not use a mask with an EDS its a canular based system. If you breath out of you mouth then the EDS will not get the pressure change to fire off its next shot of O2 So in order to achive this you have to remember to exhale through your nose. The latest version of the EDS will sound a warning if you have not had a proper breathing cycle in X nunber of mins depending on your altitude. I suspect people earlier in this thread saying they do not have it work for them are exhaling by their mouths. Al "dennis brown" wrote in message ink.net... You've touched on the shortcoming of the system. There is no indication of actual flow to the mask (I am assuming the mask as the worst case). Red/Green indicators are worse than worthless because they may decrease the delivery. Use an pulse oximeter with the system. In article , "dusty" wrote: I have had occasional problems. My breathing does not always activate the sensor so that no squirt of oxygen is receive. I had the experience of flying most of the afternoon at over 17k and noticing toward the end that I felt like I had hypoxia. But I would take a breath and look at the EDS and get the green light so everything seemed ok. I do not hear too well at certain frequencies. But during the afternoon I kept hearing (barely) a buzzing. Finally I realized that my EDS was saying that there was a problem. After some investigation after landing, I realized that when I would 'check' the EDS by inhaling, the inhalation was slightly larger than my normal breathing. This would activate the EDS. My normal breathing does not always activate the EDS. Changing the cannulus and tubing seems to helps for the first time or two but then it begins not always noticing my inhalation. I do have to use a sleep apnea machinge. Maybe there is some relationship. Later I notice "Simon Waddell" wrote in message ... Christmas is a-comin' etc. and I'm thinking of replacing my old A14 diluter demand system with a Mountain High EDS system. The A14 hasn't been used for years; now I'm living in the mountains I want something I know I can trust Can I trust the EDS system? Anybody out there got anything good or bad to say about it? Should I swap my old steel bottle for a new one - if so, aloominum or kevlar? I like the idea of the canular - is it reliable? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Hellman wrote:
Just so I'm not accused of being a MH schill, I agree with the two downsides that have been mentioned: higher initial cost and only legal to 18k. I'm repeating myself, but: Believe it or not, there's actually life outside the USA! The original poster posted with an *.ch address. If he's really living in Switzerland, as this address implies, then there's absolutely no legal concern. There are *no* regulations for oxygen use by private pilots here. Stefan |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Revisiting lapse rates (From: How high is that cloud?) | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 26th 04 09:41 PM |
FS: 1988 "Aces High" (Military Airplanes) Hardcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 23rd 04 05:18 AM |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL CONCORD, CA PHOTOS | MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL PHOTOS | Home Built | 1 | October 13th 03 03:35 AM |
ADV: MIle High supplier | David Campbell | Soaring | 0 | August 7th 03 02:16 AM |