![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some interesting comparisons were recently pointed out to me from a British
friend between the European and US tasking. It seems that more emphasis is placed upon distance in Europe to the point that we in the US would view it as impossible task calls. One only has to look at the World contest recently in Poland or any of the other ones over the past few years that took place in Europe to see this is the case. I don't think that this is anything new but would like to get opinions re how this task type would be accepted here in the US.. Distance Task: MAT type of task where any TP within the task area may be used with no limit on the total number of TPs. There must be a minimum distance of X between each TP, to be determined by the CD based upon conditions and the task area. There must be an intervening TP. A substantial airport bonus will be given and a modest bonus given for finishing at the home airfield i.e. so as not to discourage utilizing paths of lift that might not end at the home field. No time limitation. Other than those bonuses already mentioned it would be scored strictly upon total distance flown. So as to avoid someone saying "but the 15 minute rule already encourages longer flights!", it is my opinion that the "15 minute rule" has resulted in not scoring what we state is the purpose of the task (speed over a course) although it does encourage slightly longer flights by giving added points to those that fly longer and farther. If you wish to continue with this rule then lobby the Competition Committee to change the stated goal of the task which is simply "speed over a course". There is nothing wrong with our current tasks (but I would drop the 15 minute rule) with scoring based upon speed but there should be some options for other type of tasks. I anticipate that some will object to this type of distance task due to long days with crews picking them up at an airport 2-3 hours away after dark. Although I agree that it would be difficult to show up without a crew if this were instituted, practically I would think that the pilot could radio for their crew to head to some general area if they felt that they would be landing there thus saving time for both and getting back home at an earlier hour. It is also my opinion that we have made crews obsolete with the way we do things now and that maybe this type of tasking would make it a bit more fun for them but hopefully not quite as grueling as the straight out tasks of years ago. I also will anticipate that some will claim that this is little more than a "mega-PST". I'm not sure that I could argue much with that but it seems without a time limitation it throws a pretty different light upon strategy wrt starting during weak lift and ending during the same and maybe away from the home field. Finally, although I anticipate the usual flames from those that feel we worry too much about racing, this task might make the US team a bit more competitive at the world meets. So what do you all think about this? Casey Lenox KC Phoenix |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
UK - Declaring a free distance flight | tango4 | Soaring | 1 | August 22nd 03 09:01 AM |
15 M Time Management Nationals | Kilo Charlie | Soaring | 12 | August 15th 03 03:09 AM |
new TASKs and SCORING - or roll the dice | CH | Soaring | 0 | August 10th 03 07:32 AM |