![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() KSMO, an essential reliever airport for the Los Angeles basin area, provides an economic input of more than $250 million to the local economy each year and supports 175 businesses and 1,500 jobs. When the airport was transferred back to Santa Monica in 1948 after its use by the U.S. military during World War II, the city agreed to keep it open in perpetuity or its operation could revert back to the federal government. So, the City of Santa Monica's acquisition of the KSMO property was formally predicated upon the condition that city's maintain of the airport in operational status. Now it seems that, the FAA will fail to uphold that part of the original agreement, and just gift what is property and infrastructure owned by the government (and ultimately taxpayers) to the city of Santa Monica without compensation. Contact your state and federal congressional representatives and senators (Phone: 202 225 3121) and make your concerns known to those with the power to serve justice. Another airport's demise in a "back room" deal. America is getting greater by the minute. :-( Buyers purchase real estate at reduced prices that reflect the proximity to the airport, and than insist that the airport go away. Such behavior seems a bit selfish, arrogant and self serving to me. It will be interesting to hear the property owners outrage when their assessed property tax values are revised upwards to reflect the change. Watch what you wish for... Those Santa Monica officials who permitted residential development in close proximity to the airport are guilty of malfeasance in office from my prospective. They should be prosecuted for that irresponsible behavior. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news...-228418-1.html Santa Monica To Close In 2028 By Russ Niles Santa Monica Airport will close in 2028 and the runway will almost certainly be shortened to 3,500 feet. The FAA announced Saturday that it had reached an agreement to end decades of legal wrangling over the airport, which is surrounded by urban development and has been targeted for closure by local politicians since the 1980s, citing safety and environmental concerns. Under the terms of the deal, the airport has to be maintained in “continuous and stable” operating condition until Dec. 31, 2028, and allows the city to chop almost 1,500 feet from the runway. The airport has 270 aircraft and about 450 landings and takeoffs a day. It’s likely the short runway will curtail itinerant operations and may force some of the aircraft based there to move. Until the runway is shortened, the FBOs and flight schools at the airport can stay in business but after the bulldozers are finished the city can assume services at the airport. The deal is significant because it mentions local land use decisions as a factor in making decisions about aviation services and EAA Chairman Jack Pelton was quick to point that out. It's also clear that none of the aviation groups were in on the discussions. "It is certainly a disappointing development, first concerning the immediate ability to shorten the runway, and the ultimate ability to close the airport in 2028," Pelton said in a statement. "While we can only guess at the inside discussions to reach this settlement as to our knowledge, the airport’s stakeholders were not a part of it, the founding principles of FAA grant assurances are to maintain stability for an airport and its users as part of the national airspace system, above local political maneuvering.” NBAA and AOPA both suggested they'll fight the agreement. NBAA President Ed Bolen said they're still analyzing the agreement but on first blush it has concerns. “We are disappointed that the government decided to settle this case, especially given that NBAA has long been committed to aggressively supporting business aviation access to SMO, through every legislative and legal channel available. If there are further avenues available to us, we intend to explore them.” AOPA President Mark Baker said his group is also studying the agreement but opposing the decision. "Our main goal—to keep this airport permanently open and available to all general aviation users—remains unchanged. We are not done fighting for Santa Monica” Meanwhile, Santa Monica officials were quick to trumpet the news, saying the airport will be turned into a park. “The agreement ends a longstanding legal battle and secures, with absolute certainty, that the 227 acres of aviation land will be returned to the residents of Santa Monica,” the city said in a statement. The FAA and the city have been in a pitched battle recently over the city’s attempt to effectively evict airport businesses with a goal of closing the airport in two years. FAA Administrator Michael Huerta called the agreement “a fair resolution for all concerned” in a statement released Saturday. “… It strikes an appropriate balance between the public's interest in making local decisions about land use practices and its interests in safe and efficient aviation services,” he said. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FBOs Evicted At Santa Monica Airport | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | September 24th 16 02:32 AM |
Santa Monica Airport: How Long Before Politicians' ILLEGALLY Bulldoze KSMO In The Dead Of Night? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 2 | November 16th 14 04:48 AM |
Join us to help save Santa Monica Airport! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 8 | September 13th 14 04:30 PM |
Santa Monica Airport Bans Jet Traffic | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 22 | April 7th 08 10:52 PM |
Which Came First, the Santa Monica Airport, Or Those Who Chose To Build Their Homes Adjacent To It? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 16 | May 7th 07 10:34 PM |