![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am in the process of buying my first glider. I have
been looking on a few. Should I expect the current owner to have document signed by a FAA inspector (or someone similar) stating the weight of the glider? How do I know the weight is what the owner is telling me? Regards |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier, Miguel Lavalle wrote:
I am in the process of buying my first glider. I have been looking on a few. Should I expect the current owner to have document signed by a FAA inspector (or someone similar) stating the weight of the glider? How do I know the weight is what the owner is telling me? Someone has probably beaten me to this one, but: You can expect that as part of the standard AR(R)OW documents, the paperwork must include something (placards, charts, or a document) that states the current empty weight and empty CG location as determined either by actual weighing or by calculation. However, that document is not maintained or signed off on by the FAA, and I don't think that you can expect it to be contractually binding. The only way you can be certain of the empty weight is to make a weighing and CG determination part of your pre-buy inspection. I have a hard time imagining that a seller would deliberately mis-represent the weight of the aircraft. However, I know that a lot of glider owners and sellers don't have any particular certainty about what their glider weighs. I do know that aircraft do tend to get heavier just by sitting around; I think that they somehow accumulate some of the interstellar 'dark matter' that physicists are always nattering about. Bob K. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a "certified" weight and balance must be in the aircraft documents.. either
the POH or the aircraft logs.. the weight and balance is certified by either (1) factory or (2) an IA (cert mechanic). some aircraft POH require a "re-weigh" every 5yrs.. and that has never been complied with.. if the seller can not show you a proper (signed by IA) weight and balance in the aircraft maint logs, (aircraft placards don't count), the a proper weight and balance as part of the pre-buy inspection is on order.. if the seller does not agree that a "pre-buy" inspection is needed.. walk away... BT "Bob Kuykendall" wrote in message ... Earlier, Miguel Lavalle wrote: I am in the process of buying my first glider. I have been looking on a few. Should I expect the current owner to have document signed by a FAA inspector (or someone similar) stating the weight of the glider? How do I know the weight is what the owner is telling me? Someone has probably beaten me to this one, but: You can expect that as part of the standard AR(R)OW documents, the paperwork must include something (placards, charts, or a document) that states the current empty weight and empty CG location as determined either by actual weighing or by calculation. However, that document is not maintained or signed off on by the FAA, and I don't think that you can expect it to be contractually binding. The only way you can be certain of the empty weight is to make a weighing and CG determination part of your pre-buy inspection. I have a hard time imagining that a seller would deliberately mis-represent the weight of the aircraft. However, I know that a lot of glider owners and sellers don't have any particular certainty about what their glider weighs. I do know that aircraft do tend to get heavier just by sitting around; I think that they somehow accumulate some of the interstellar 'dark matter' that physicists are always nattering about. Bob K. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTIZ wrote:
a "certified" weight and balance must be in the aircraft documents.. either the POH or the aircraft logs.. the weight and balance is certified by either (1) factory or (2) an IA (cert mechanic). if the seller can not show you a proper (signed by IA) weight and balance in the aircraft maint logs, (aircraft placards don't count), the a proper weight and balance as part of the pre-buy inspection is on order.. I have never heard of the IA requirement. As far as I know regular ol' A&P (or even just "A" airframe mechanics, though there are few of these) routinely perform minor alterations and repairs and create an updated W&B. If anyone has a reference preventing a common, garden variety A&P from doing this W&B calculation and signing it, I'd love to hear it. I have a hard time imagining that a seller would deliberately mis-represent the weight of the aircraft. However, I know that a lot of glider owners and sellers don't have any particular certainty about what their glider weighs. I do know that aircraft do tend to get heavier just by sitting around; I think that they somehow accumulate some of the interstellar 'dark matter' that physicists are always nattering about. Bob K. Some official weight and balance instructions involve three weighings. I would suggest NOT doing three weighings or getting an official W&B during the pre-buy. I would instead suggest getting an unofficial W&B (one or two weighings). Then decide if you wish to buy the aircraft. It doesn't matter how much it is over the last "officially calculated" W&B, it only matters whether it is heavier than a comparably equipped and priced glider. If you can find the exact same glider for the same price elsewhere, and it is lighter, buy it. But ALL of these old aircraft are gonna be over the "calculated" weight. The real question is WHY? Lots of "repairs" or just lots of instruments? Pounds of dirt in the inside bottom? A mistake in the math of one of the mechanics along the way? If you decide to buy the thing, perhaps you will decide to do a new official W&B and reduce the paper useful load of your aircraft by 20-100 pounds. On the other hand, perhaps you will file the unofficial W&B in the back of your noggin and fly it using the last "official" weight and balance. As far as I know, both options are perfectly legal for most general aviation aircraft... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My SZD-59 Acro is for sale with or without L-Nav and Model 20 GPS. I have
also removed my personal land out kit which affects weight and balance. A new weight and balance and annual should be a part or your requirements on the part of the seller. As a seller I would be expected to provide this data as a part of the the selling price. IMHO, Bob Kibby "old 59A" new "2BK" -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com "Miguel Lavalle" wrote in message ... I am in the process of buying my first glider. I have been looking on a few. Should I expect the current owner to have document signed by a FAA inspector (or someone similar) stating the weight of the glider? How do I know the weight is what the owner is telling me? Regards |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
very true Mark... could be an A&P... could be an IA.. or is that AI..
IIRC.. and A&P can't sign off an annual.. so we always deal with AI.. we have one in the club anyway.. roger on the "un-official" weighs.. before the pre-buy.. being over the documented weight could be (1) instruments installed but not added to the documented W&B (2) un documented repairs (3) natural weight gain of aging gliders.. BT "Mark James Boyd" wrote in message news:3fdfcce4$1@darkstar... BTIZ wrote: a "certified" weight and balance must be in the aircraft documents.. either the POH or the aircraft logs.. the weight and balance is certified by either (1) factory or (2) an IA (cert mechanic). if the seller can not show you a proper (signed by IA) weight and balance in the aircraft maint logs, (aircraft placards don't count), the a proper weight and balance as part of the pre-buy inspection is on order.. I have never heard of the IA requirement. As far as I know regular ol' A&P (or even just "A" airframe mechanics, though there are few of these) routinely perform minor alterations and repairs and create an updated W&B. If anyone has a reference preventing a common, garden variety A&P from doing this W&B calculation and signing it, I'd love to hear it. I have a hard time imagining that a seller would deliberately mis-represent the weight of the aircraft. However, I know that a lot of glider owners and sellers don't have any particular certainty about what their glider weighs. I do know that aircraft do tend to get heavier just by sitting around; I think that they somehow accumulate some of the interstellar 'dark matter' that physicists are always nattering about. Bob K. Some official weight and balance instructions involve three weighings. I would suggest NOT doing three weighings or getting an official W&B during the pre-buy. I would instead suggest getting an unofficial W&B (one or two weighings). Then decide if you wish to buy the aircraft. It doesn't matter how much it is over the last "officially calculated" W&B, it only matters whether it is heavier than a comparably equipped and priced glider. If you can find the exact same glider for the same price elsewhere, and it is lighter, buy it. But ALL of these old aircraft are gonna be over the "calculated" weight. The real question is WHY? Lots of "repairs" or just lots of instruments? Pounds of dirt in the inside bottom? A mistake in the math of one of the mechanics along the way? If you decide to buy the thing, perhaps you will decide to do a new official W&B and reduce the paper useful load of your aircraft by 20-100 pounds. On the other hand, perhaps you will file the unofficial W&B in the back of your noggin and fly it using the last "official" weight and balance. As far as I know, both options are perfectly legal for most general aviation aircraft... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a good brief article titled
'A Quick No Math Technique for Locating the Gross Weight C.G. of Your Sailplane' by Stanley A. Hall, Sunnyvale, California, in Soaring Magazine, September 1997, page 4. Good charts, diagrams, logarithmic scales. Well done. Very short. Simple. Dancing on clouds, Keep it up! Jim Culp USA GatorCity Florida |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier, "BTIZ" wrote:
IIRC.. an[] A&P can't sign off an annual.. True enough for type certificated gliders. However, for most Experimental/Racing and similar, the operating limitations say the annual "condition" inspection must be performed per the scope and detail of FAR Part 43 Appendix D by an A&P or repairman - not necessarily an AI. There are actually a great number of gliders in the US operating under Experimental/Racing or Experimental/Exhibition Special Airworthiness certificates. Last I checked, that included every ASW-20 in the country, and a host of other production machines as well. Thanks, and best regards to all Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just bought a 10 year old glider.
What I checked was the following. The original Factory test report and empty W &B. Made sure no major repair was visually apparent. added the equipment that is installed after the test report Including batteries plus ~ 5 lb for old age. If it has been repainted in part or whole add between 7 lb and 15 lb. and your are done. If a major repair was done it should been documented and the glider would have been reweight and the new weight entered into the log. Udo I am in the process of buying my first glider. I have been looking on a few. Should I expect the current owner to have document signed by a FAA inspector (or someone similar) stating the weight of the glider? How do I know the weight is what the owner is telling me? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
F35 cost goes up. | Pat Carpenter | Military Aviation | 116 | April 11th 04 07:32 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Latest Newsletter Pipistrel Motorgliders | Michael Coates | Soaring | 20 | September 19th 03 01:25 AM |
Restricting Glider Ops at Public Arpt. | rjciii | Soaring | 36 | August 25th 03 04:50 PM |