![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello All,
Since this is about the most resouceful group I know, I though somebody may be able to help. I have been trying to find the supersonic L/D of the B-1A or B and the SR-71. Does anybody have any information concerning either. I realize that the L/D is mach dependent, but I can not fine anything at any mach number. I am doing a comparative analysis on a supersonic configuration, and the info would be most helpful. Thanks in advance for any help Best Regards, Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Supersonic L/D is very complex, as angle of attack affects drag
drastically. You would almost need a complete set of aerodynamic tables which show normal force and axial force coefficients as a function of both Mach no. and alpha. I am sorry, but there is really no simple answer. I realize there is no simple answer, I was trying to elude to that point when I first asked the question. Of course alpha effects drag which effects L/D, and on, and on, we go. I am not asking for a detailed engineering exercise. All I am really asking "is there any L/D published data that may be found". This is a very, very, very top level analysis, not a detailed engineering exercise. You might say extremely parametric is nature. All configurations have an optimum L/D (max) for given mach point (taking into account everything you describe and more), and that is what one usually finds in the publications. Everybody shows there best. I do appreciate your response, but all I am looking for is something ( that is somewhat reasonable) to turn into a point on a chart - LOL. Thanks again Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave,
I don't know if this will help but when you need data sometimes anything will do. "Supersonic and Subsonic Airplane Design", Gerald Corning, 1970, lists the projected cruise L/D of the Boeing SST (2707-300) as 7.35 at mach 2.7 and 60,000 feet. Boeing was quite proud of the -300 until they started doing powered wind tunnel tests. It turned out that at cruise the engine exhaust hit the tail and would have burnt it off. Faced with pressure from Congress and the need for yet another complete airplane redesign, Boeing killed the program. When it comes to an American SST, "that's the rest of the story". I'll see if I have anything else around here but you might try a search of "Aviation Week" for that period. A long time ago I found some of my work there before I had even finished with it. Rich |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Appreciate the help guys! You're right Rich, at a point, anything with do.
And Stealth Pilot, thanks very much! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|