![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I googled this topic and found a few threads...but
nothing to recent. Anyone out in cyberspace want to provide input from *actual* use? I am not intersted in started a flame war over the 'purity' of using these devices. Just curious as to how they have worked out. I drop waypoints into my GPS on occasion when I work a blue thermal that is on my return course...but other then that I use the conditions outside the cockpit to hunt thermals. I noticed where WinPilot now has a means of evaluating multiple flights to determine ahead of time where thermals may be...sort of a refinement of CH's project. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have used the WinPilot thermal centering feature since I first plugged the
unit into my 302...I would have to say that it works...I find that it's just one more little beep in the cockpit,that I really don't pay much attention to, but on the weird western washington days, when thermals rapidly cycle and the day is drying out very quickly, I have many times found myself confirming my decisions by the reassuring little beep the thermal centering feature makes. I have never allowed it to drive me, and in most cases feel that it lags just enough that you tend to analyze the thermal yourself and make your own decision and then the instrument backs you up...there of course are the odd times, when you get distracted by it, as it gets a little confused when you are working thermals that have multiple "cores" or perhaps two or three thermals all culminating under one large cloud...but in those cases you just fly and do what you think is right. I have never found it to be a detriment in the cockpit and I think in some ways it might make you pay more attention subliminally to analyzing your thermals better...If you are doing things well...it never squawks... As with most technology...it suits some and doesn't suit other is my best guess. Steve. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Stewart,
My friends Fred Hewitt owns a DG-1000 which has a Themi installed. He says he really like it a lot. That is the only direct feedback I've received on the Themi. I sell the Themi. Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. http://www.cumulus-soaring.com "Stewart Kissel" wrote in message ... I googled this topic and found a few threads...but nothing to recent. Anyone out in cyberspace want to provide input from *actual* use? I am not intersted in started a flame war over the 'purity' of using these devices. Just curious as to how they have worked out. I drop waypoints into my GPS on occasion when I work a blue thermal that is on my return course...but other then that I use the conditions outside the cockpit to hunt thermals. I noticed where WinPilot now has a means of evaluating multiple flights to determine ahead of time where thermals may be...sort of a refinement of CH's project. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not flown with Themi but have used climb maximizer for a few years now.
It works pretty well especially if conditions are light and you are tired at the end of a flight. It helps take the guess work out of centering. I get more value however in zooming in so I can see in the circle the lift dot sizes relative to turn. Just steer for the bigger lift dots. Al |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First of all, I am a dealer for Themi in the USA.
Bernd Scheffel, the designer of Themi, came to our gliderport several years ago with his Themi device and installed it in our Duo Discus. We flew together for an hour or so, and I considered the device as "interesting." With my vast hours of thermalling experience, I had developed certain Pavlovian responses to bumps in the air and beeps of the audio. I considered my thermalling methods to be at least above average, fully understanding the typical turmoil of the thermal air-flow. I doubted if Themi would be a useful tool - at least for me or any experienced pilot. One day, I decided to find out just what Themi was capable of. I doggedly followed the blinking lights and discovered to my amazement that it was unerringly correct. Often, my resposnes to bumps and beeps would have been different than Themi indicated. One must understand Themi does not look out the window. Using simple variometer and GPS signals, it only tells the pilot where the center of the lift was as experienced during the last turn. For this reason, I find Themi most valuable when there are no clouds, or iwhen low and disassociated from the clouds. At these times, Themi is invaluable. Themi uses two bright LED lights to signal when to steepen, shallow turns or fly straight to the better lift. When the pilot is centering correctly, there are no light signals. No distracting audio, nothing to distract the pilot. There is no reason to look anywhere except outside the glider, observing conditions outside for visual clues and collision avoidance. The trend towards devices inside the cockpit which can be distracting, and often provide lots of "interesting" information rather than the few things a pilot really needs to know is an important issue when considering adding any device to your cockpit. More information about Themi can be found on our web site. Tom Knauff Knauff & Grove Soaring Supplies www.eglider.org |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find Climb Maximizer to be pretty useful. It appers
to work on the same basic principle as Tom describes for Themi though I suspect each uses its own algorithm. Having looked at the Themi, I personally find the blinking lights to be a bit non-intuitive compared to the 'cut soda can' display Winpilot uses to depict climb rate around each turn, the arrow pointing to the strongest lift and the beep when it's time to shallow your bank. The beep is great because you can be looking in any direction and still make use of the advice. I know one person who installed a Themi and took it out after finding it too hard to decipher. That's only one example, so don't draw too much from it. Other pilots seem to like theirs. It certainly doen't take up any space if your panel is already full. On the other hand WinPilot is also a full flight computer, so if you're setting up a new panel there may be some cost benefit. One shortcoming for me is that you need to fly a complete circle before climb maximizer can give any advice. The first turn is often the most critical in terms of centering - or leaving - a thermal. For that decision you're on your own. 9B At 14:30 27 January 2005, Thomas Knauff wrote: First of all, I am a dealer for Themi in the USA. Bernd Scheffel, the designer of Themi, came to our gliderport several years ago with his Themi device and installed it in our Duo Discus. We flew together for an hour or so, and I considered the device as 'interesting.' With my vast hours of thermalling experience, I had developed certain Pavlovian responses to bumps in the air and beeps of the audio. I considered my thermalling methods to be at least above average, fully understanding the typical turmoil of the thermal air-flow. I doubted if Themi would be a useful tool - at least for me or any experienced pilot. One day, I decided to find out just what Themi was capable of. I doggedly followed the blinking lights and discovered to my amazement that it was unerringly correct. Often, my resposnes to bumps and beeps would have been different than Themi indicated. One must understand Themi does not look out the window. Using simple variometer and GPS signals, it only tells the pilot where the center of the lift was as experienced during the last turn. For this reason, I find Themi most valuable when there are no clouds, or iwhen low and disassociated from the clouds. At these times, Themi is invaluable. Themi uses two bright LED lights to signal when to steepen, shallow turns or fly straight to the better lift. When the pilot is centering correctly, there are no light signals. No distracting audio, nothing to distract the pilot. There is no reason to look anywhere except outside the glider, observing conditions outside for visual clues and collision avoidance. The trend towards devices inside the cockpit which can be distracting, and often provide lots of 'interesting' information rather than the few things a pilot really needs to know is an important issue when considering adding any device to your cockpit. More information about Themi can be found on our web site. Tom Knauff Knauff & Grove Soaring Supplies www.eglider.org |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the input and also private emails on this
subject... I would offer this as sort of a summary from what I have read, far from it for me to be any sort of expert, just my two cents. It appears most pilots using either device are experienced at thermalling...so these devices are used to aid, rather then driving the effort. In particular the idea to keep eyes-out of the cockpit, obviously (I think) the idea of using these in a gaggle is unwise. Other gliders make better indicators of the core. As far a cost and logistics...one is just an upgrade of software. So those already running WinPilot probably have the less-painless option. However, it appears the THEMI device is also an IGC approved logger...so if true this may give an option for non-Winpilot types. I will wait and watch how these products are used, if I wait long enough, I can usually upgrade my panel using the leftovers from the 1V5 mob ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stewart Kissel wrote:
As far a cost and logistics...one is just an upgrade of software. So those already running WinPilot probably have the less-painless option. However, it appears the THEMI device is also an IGC approved logger...so if true this may give an option for non-Winpilot types. What would be really interesting is use the Themi as your IGC logger and drive WinPilot with it. The two could be compared directly - that would be an interesting article for Soaring, or a presentation at a convention. If someone will loan me a Themi, and someone loan me Winpilot, I'd be glad to do the testing and write the article. I'm serious, but I'm not holding my breath, either! -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems odd to me that the THEMI has no Means of Propulsion
sensor. John Galloway At 19:30 28 January 2005, Eric Greenwell wrote: Stewart Kissel wrote: As far a cost and logistics...one is just an upgrade of software. So those already running WinPilot probably have the less-painless option. However, it appears the THEMI device is also an IGC approved logger...so if true this may give an option for non-Winpilot types. What would be really interesting is use the Themi as your IGC logger and drive WinPilot with it. The two could be compared directly - that would be an interesting article for Soaring, or a presentation at a convention. If someone will loan me a Themi, and someone loan me Winpilot, I'd be glad to do the testing and write the article. I'm serious, but I'm not holding my breath, either! -- Change 'netto' to 'net' to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Galloway wrote:
It seems odd to me that the THEMI has no Means of Propulsion sensor. That is unfortunate for me, since I could not use it for an IGC logger, and it's only value would be as thermalling aid. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Themi | Mathilde Akar | Soaring | 19 | December 20th 04 08:57 PM |