![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just a question to see if this is typical. Evidently the only agency now
willing to insure Flying Club high performance retractables is AOPA. Its great they are stepping up to help AOPA members, we have a 210 and Avemco has left the market. However the new policy in effect for our club will be 250TT (good - it used to be 350), 50 hours retractable, 25 in type. Is this typical for other clubs with AOPA? Who is going to be willing to pay for 25 hours with an instructor? Remember this is a flying club where members supposedly are able to move up to planes as they gain experience. That is a lot of money and time to haul an instructor around if you were able to get Bonanza or other comparable time. Even 25 hours dual is not enough if that is the only retractable time. Then a potential student is looking at 50 hours dual with an instructor or else find a club with an Arrow I guess. Did the high performance airplane just receive a death sentence for clubs? Ron |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Did the high performance airplane just receive a death sentence for clubs? Yes. Lots of clubs are learning the harsh reality of owning these. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron wrote:
Just a question to see if this is typical. Evidently the only agency now willing to insure Flying Club high performance retractables is AOPA. Its great they are stepping up to help AOPA members, we have a 210 and Avemco has left the market. The first question you need to ask yourself is WHY did Avemco leave the market? And the answer is that high performance retracts in clubs have an unattractive loss history, especially when flown by the inexperienced pilot. However the new policy in effect for our club will be 250TT (good - it used to be 350), 50 hours retractable, 25 in type. Is this typical for other clubs with AOPA? It is from what I have seen. What's more, it's actually better than what I see at FBO's, the few times an FBO even has an airplane like that to rent. Who is going to be willing to pay for 25 hours with an instructor? Very few, and that's the point. The goal is to not insure the transition pilot, but only a pilot who is already expereinced in that kind of airplane. As an added benefit, the plane flies fewer hours, and since it sits a lot it's available to the few experienced members who can fly it, and who will fly it more. Remember this is a flying club where members supposedly are able to move up to planes as they gain experience. The concept of simply moving up as you gain experience is going by the wayside. People are simply not learning the skills necessary to do that, and insurance companies are catching on. Now they want to make sure that experience is gained in the same class of airplane, and plenty of it - with an instructor along to reduce the risk. That is a lot of money and time to haul an instructor around if you were able to get Bonanza or other comparable time. And I have no doubt that if you had a pilot with 1000 hours, 500 of them Bonanza/Comanche time, you could name him at no additional cost with a minimal (5 hours at most) chechout. That's the kind of pilot the insurers want to see high performance retracts. Did the high performance airplane just receive a death sentence for clubs? Probably. The realistic way to fly a high performance complex airplane is group ownership, and if you're not going to be flying it enough to justify owning a 1/4 share, then you really shouldn't be flying it anyway. Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Ron wrote:
Who is going to be willing to pay for 25 hours with an instructor? Hardly anyone. You may get some people who do their Commercial instruction (so they aren't just doing a 25 hour checkout). However, the insurance might be negotiable. For example, when our club had a Bonanza, it had fairly onerous checkout requirements. I had significant enough time in other retracts that they reduced the dual time requirement for me to 5 hours, followed by 5 hours solo. Had I needed a 25 hour checkout I'd have never bothered - it would cost far too much money before I could make any use of the plane. There were never very many members checked out in the Bonanza, but it did fly a reasonable amount, and it was almost entirely used for cross country trips. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith wrote:
Had I needed a 25 hour checkout I'd have never bothered - it would cost far too much money before I could make any use of the plane. Can't you use the plane with an instructor in it? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High Price of Flying Wires? | PWK | Home Built | 34 | October 8th 17 08:24 PM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |
Airman flying high with elite team | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 17th 03 03:24 AM |
High Flight NOTAM | Kirk Stant | Military Aviation | 1 | September 10th 03 03:31 AM |