![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By Deborah Charles
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A group of airline pilots gave the U.S. government failing grades on Thursday in several areas of aviation security including the screening of employees and cargo, and defending planes from shoulder-fired missiles. The Coalition of Airline Pilots Association released its Aviation Security Report Card that showed aviation security gets average to failing grades in over a dozen subject areas. The trade group gave failing "F" grades to the government in five areas -- screening of employees, screening of cargo, high-tech credentialing of crew members, self-defense training for crew and the plan for countering shoulder-fired missiles. The group gave good grades to the government on improved bag screening and on reinforcing cockpit doors on commercial airplanes. Jon Safley, president of CAPA, said filling some of the "gaping holes" in aviation security will require major changes in the way the airlines and airports do business, and in the way the government manages airline security. "The technology exists, or could be updated, to address many of these security problems," said Safley, whose group represents about 22,000 pilots from American Airlines, United Parcel Service, Southwest Airlines and AirTran Airways . "But neither the airlines, the airports nor government officials have given these issues the priority they deserve." CAPA said that while screening of airline passengers and their bags had improved since the Sept. 11, 2001, hijacked airline attacks, screening of ramp employees and cargo has not improved. "We should have one level of security to protect the American people," Safley said. "If we're screening passengers, we certainly need to screen employees who have access to aircraft and baggage. And not screening cargo on all-cargo carriers invites disaster." The Department of Homeland Security is studying how it might be able to adapt anti-missile technology, which is common on military aircraft, for use on U.S. commercial airliners to thwart shoulder-fired rocket attacks by al Qaeda or others. Concern over the possibility that attackers might use shoulder-fired weapons to down a plane grew after a missile nearly hit an Israeli airliner leaving Kenya in 2002. Cash-strapped airlines are skeptical of the plan for anti-missile systems due to high costs and liability. CAPA also gave low grades to the government on security of airports, saying that the Transportation Security Administration did not properly or consistently oversee the security. It also said there was poor sharing of information on potential threats to aircraft, and said airlines did not share the crucial information with their captains. ---------------------------------------------------------------- George Patterson I prefer Heaven for climate but Hell for company. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As someone who travels with the clothes I'm wearing and a book to read,
I have scant sympathy for either the airline or the government... For people flying somewhere the imperative is to get them there safely, not to get the 70 or 80 pounds of cargo per person there safely... If I were Czar you would be limited to an overcoat, purse/briefcase, one laptop or equal size carry on... and that's it... If you want to ship 80 pounds of baggage, send it by UPS or FedEx... All right now, at least 300 of you will react in outrage and indignation... Well, I'm indignant and outraged also because hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, including mine, are being spent on xray machines and all kinds of technology all because folks ship the contents of their house by passenger plane... No baggage, no baggage screeners, just the normal pat down of your person, no baggage carts, no or minimal xray machines, no lost luggage, and on, and on... Why the airlines would be forced to drop the ticket prices, and 2/3 of the airport screeners would be allowed to do something productive for the national economy... denny |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It always ****es me off when I get on with my small carry on (enough
business clothes for a week rolled up real tight) and can't find room in the overhead because some jerk brough his entire closet with him. -Robert, CFI |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George Patterson wrote: By Deborah Charles WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A group of airline pilots gave the U.S. government failing grades on Thursday in several areas of aviation security including the screening of employees and cargo, and defending planes from shoulder-fired missiles. snip Sounds like more fear-mongering to me. Unless every airliner is going to be popping off IR flares whenever they get below 10,000 ft., there's not much the Government can do to protect them from a Stinger-type shoulder fired missile. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yup. Good plan. Let's just trash business flying altogether and
let them all drive. Your plan might work okay for people going someplace for a period of time .. but for business people who often change their plans frequently .. how do you propose they get their clothing to be where they are in a timely manner. The single thing that would make the biggest difference in security is to allow profiling. Until we look for the terrorists themselves .. we're just ****ing in the wind. "Denny" wrote in message ups.com... As someone who travels with the clothes I'm wearing and a book to read, I have scant sympathy for either the airline or the government... For people flying somewhere the imperative is to get them there safely, not to get the 70 or 80 pounds of cargo per person there safely... If I were Czar you would be limited to an overcoat, purse/briefcase, one laptop or equal size carry on... and that's it... If you want to ship 80 pounds of baggage, send it by UPS or FedEx... All right now, at least 300 of you will react in outrage and indignation... Well, I'm indignant and outraged also because hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, including mine, are being spent on xray machines and all kinds of technology all because folks ship the contents of their house by passenger plane... No baggage, no baggage screeners, just the normal pat down of your person, no baggage carts, no or minimal xray machines, no lost luggage, and on, and on... Why the airlines would be forced to drop the ticket prices, and 2/3 of the airport screeners would be allowed to do something productive for the national economy... denny |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The single thing that would make the biggest difference in
security is to allow profiling. Until we look for the terrorists themselves .. we're just ****ing in the wind. Yes, and not just terrorists. We should profile for other criminals too, such as drug lords, child molesters, embezzlers, welfare cheats, deadbeat dads, jaywalkers, athiests, and other evil people. Once this is in place, we can enjoy the free society our forefathers died for. Jose -- Math is a game. The object of the game is to figure out the rules. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
The single thing that would make the biggest difference in security is to allow profiling. Until we look for the terrorists themselves .. we're just ****ing in the wind. Yes, and not just terrorists. We should profile for other criminals too, such as drug lords, child molesters, embezzlers, welfare cheats, deadbeat dads, jaywalkers, athiests, and other evil people. Once this is in place, we can enjoy the free society our forefathers died for. So on one hand we have organized gangs with a demonstrated ability of killing thousands of civilians at a time and a strongly stated desire of killing hundreds of thousands and on the other hand we have embezzlers, welfare cheats, etc. If you look really hard Jose, you may be able to dimly make out a substantive distinction. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you look really hard Jose, you may be able to dimly make out a substantive distinction.
Yes, =I= can make that distinction. However I do not trust our government to do so. Jose -- Math is a game. The object of the game is to figure out the rules. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So on one hand we have organized gangs with a demonstrated ability of killing thousands of civilians at a time and a strongly stated desire of killing hundreds of thousands and on the other hand we have embezzlers, welfare cheats, etc.
If you look really hard Jose, you may be able to dimly make out a substantive distinction. (oops - pressed the wrong button.) Yes, =I= can make that distinction. However I do not trust our government to do so. I have personally been on the wrong end of a machine gun for insisting (politely) that my film be hand inspected at LGA rather than run through the X-ray machine. The screener insisted that there were "secret laws" that applied, something that was only straightend out (in my favor) when I called the FAA out on them. The same thing happened to me in DC when I dashed into an alcove (a legitimate entrance to a museum) in a rainstorm; I didn't want to enter the museum, but didn't want my film X-rayed. Ten security guards escorted me back into the rainstorm. (I swear the entire contingent was called out). Does "carnivore" ring a bell, or has everyone forgotten the gross intrusion of privacy =that= entailed? The profile of the Columbine killers is the same as a good portion of our youth, most of whom are perfectly good citizens with odd (or not even that odd) tastes. Profiling effectively criminalizes harmless but unusual behavior, and this is bad for society in a way that will not be apparant for twenty years, and cannot be undone. The presumption of innocence upon which this country is based becomes nothing more than doubletalk if we need to prove our innocence before being presumed so. We are doing =far= more damage to ourselves than the terrorists ever did. Jose -- Math is a game. The object of the game is to figure out the rules. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny" wrote in message ups.com... As someone who travels with the clothes I'm wearing and a book to read, I have scant sympathy for either the airline or the government... Well, the rest of us have scant sympathy for your impatience. The fact is, most people plan to stay at their destination for more than a few hours. What are you, French? I don't suppose you bathe, either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
ENHANCED AVIATION SECURITY PACKAGE ANNOUNCED (All "General Aviation Pilots" to Pay $200.00 every two years!) | www.agacf.org | Piloting | 4 | December 21st 03 09:08 PM |
Aviation is too expensive | Chris W | Piloting | 71 | August 21st 03 11:54 AM |