![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone know how common ground resonance incidents are in helicopters in
general and SH-2s in particular? www.nzherald.co.nz/index.cfm?ObjectID=10112184 see also http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/news/articles/2004/12/1206.html Pilots censured on helicopter bungle [Helicopters on RNZN ships are kind-of operated by the RNZAF, hence mixture of Navy and Air Force references] 23.02.05 A Navy pilot and co-pilot responsible for a lashing bungle which damaged a Seasprite helicopter during anti-terrorist patrols in the Gulf of Oman last year have been censured, the Defence Force said yesterday. The Seasprite, aboard the Navy frigate HMNZS Te Mana last May, was incorrectly lashed to the deck, a court of inquiry found. The helicopter was badly damaged by excessive vibration, known as ground resonance, when its jet engine was started for a routine run. Repair costs have been estimated at between $1.5-$3 million. The Navy pilot and co-pilot involved in the incident had been censured, Air Force spokesman Squadron Leader Ric Cullinane said. "That essentially means a letter goes into their file and there will be consequences for future employment, promotion or postings," he said. "But there is the opportunity to show that it was a one-off incident." The incident may eventually cost nearly $4 million, once additional costs of delivering a replacement helicopter to the gulf and bringing the damaged Seasprite home are accounted for. The accident happened when the frigate was deployed as part of a multi-national taskforce hunting for terrorists, sympathisers and illegal cargoes in the gulf and the Arabian Sea. Following court recommendations, the Navy and Royal New Zealand Air Force are now developing new publications to highlight correct lashing procedures and the dangers of ground resonance, and are reviewing training materials. The Air Force magazine Insight said the Navy was fortunate the pilot was unscathed and the aircraft was repairable. "The majority of ground resonance events that have occurred on a Seasprite have resulted in complete destruction of the aircraft." Mechanical problems with the Air Force's five Seasprite helicopters in the past year reduced training time and resulted in one mission sacrificing flight safety, Insight said. "On this occasion an aircraft, that was only rated for day visual flight rules (VFR) flying, flew into the hours of darkness and the crew were unaware that the anti-collision lights were unserviceable." The Seasprites recorded 65 flight safety events (FSE) in 2004. Eight incidents involved smoke and fumes, and five of those occurred in the same helicopter, which took eight months to repair. Numerous mechanical problems in the past year had meant training sorties had not been completed in time and put pressure on instructors to conduct exercises whenever possible, Insight said. The Seasprites reported more incidents involving human factors than any other squadron, "which is commendable, as all squadrons will have had a number of incidents that went unreported", the magazine said. A total of 357 FSEs were reported over 2004. -- Errol Cavit | | "If I have to choose between my country going under and England going under, I should want my country to go under. For England is the bastion of us all." Dr.HV Evatt, Australian Minister for External Affairs, New York, March 1942. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Errol Cavit wrote:
Anyone know how common ground resonance incidents are in helicopters in general and SH-2s in particular? Don't know much about the H-2, but on the H-60 there are a couple of tiedown points just above and behind the cockpit doors. While the rotors are turning you don't use these to chain the aircraft to the ship, because the aircraft can get into ground resonsance that way. I don't think ground resonsance incidents are very common. Common causes might be a weak blade damper (like the shock absorber on your car), combined with a hard landing that may "excite" one of the blades to vibrate divergently. The way the aircraft is touching the ground has a lot to do with it too- it will vibrate differently in the air than on the ground when the wheels are on the deck or depending on different tiedowns points being used. Possible responses by the pilot could be immediately taking off again (to break the connection to the ground) or immediately shutting down the rotor system. The problem usually does not solve itself but instead gets very bad in a matter of seconds. That's it in a general terms. Each thing I said is not necessarily true in every case of ground resonance. If you want to understand it on a fundamental level, I think the mathematical explanation is pretty advanced, way beyond my level anyway ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | April 29th 04 03:08 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
HH-60 ACCIDENT REPORT RELEASED | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 4th 03 03:06 AM |