GLIDING INTERNATIONAL -- RESEARCH

We at Gliding International have just completed a three months study on the accident sitution in regard to our sport. We have examined (in detail) the 96 reported accidents which show that our problematic area of soaring flight relates to the landing phase.

We took note of all accidents from 1/1/2019 to 31/08/2019 which indicates for sure (on the conservative side) that fatalities for the calendar year of 2019 will be 43. No organisation or sport should turn a blind eye to what is obviously a totally unacceptable situation.

We haven't got an answer to this problem but we are open to discussion and be a catalyst for change.

Also in our November issue is a report from Sebastian Kawa who has personally set out to explain his recent serious accident. An uphill landing into a very questionable landing zone with no options. He must be complimented for writing his report on the accident for our sport enthusiasts. He tells all how to avoid a repetition of the problem. Basically the accident emanated from the failure of his motor to start. He has quoted the number of experiences he has personally experienced with motor failures and has started a war on brands of motors that must be regarded as totally unreliable.

JOHN ROAKE
EDITOR

At 08:04 03 November 2019, wrote:
We at Gliding International have just completed a three months
study on
the=
accident sitution in regard to our sport. We have examined (in
detail)
th=
e 96 reported accidents which show that our problematic area of
soaring
fl=
ight relates to the landing phase.

We took note of all accidents from 1/1/2019 to 31/08/2019 which
indicates
f=
or sure (on the conservative side) that fatalities for the calendar
year
of=
2019 will be 43. No organisation or sport should turn a blind eye
to
what=
is obviously a totally unacceptable situation.

We haven't got an answer to this problem but we are open to
discussion and
=
be a catalyst for change.

Also in our November issue is a report from Sebastian Kawa who
has
personal=
ly set out to explain his recent serious accident. An uphill landing
into
=
a very questionable landing zone with no options. He must be
complimented
=
for writing his report on the accident for our sport enthusiasts. He
tells
=
all how to avoid a repetition of the problem. Basically the accident
emanat=
ed from the failure of his motor to start. He has quoted the
number of
exp=
eriences he has personally experienced with motor failures and has
started
=
a war on brands of motors that must be regarded as totally
unreliable.

JOHN ROAKE
EDITOR


One should never rely on the motor to start.........

The engine's failure to start did not cause the accident.Â* The reliance
on the engine to start was one link in the accident chain.

On 11/3/2019 5:23 AM, Paul T wrote:
At 08:04 03 November 2019, wrote:
We at Gliding International have just completed a three months
study on
the=
accident sitution in regard to our sport. We have examined (in
detail)
th=
e 96 reported accidents which show that our problematic area of
soaring
fl=
ight relates to the landing phase.

We took note of all accidents from 1/1/2019 to 31/08/2019 which
indicates
f=
or sure (on the conservative side) that fatalities for the calendar
year
of=
2019 will be 43. No organisation or sport should turn a blind eye
to
what=
is obviously a totally unacceptable situation.

We haven't got an answer to this problem but we are open to
discussion and
=
be a catalyst for change.

Also in our November issue is a report from Sebastian Kawa who
has
personal=
ly set out to explain his recent serious accident. An uphill landing
into
=
a very questionable landing zone with no options. He must be
complimented
=
for writing his report on the accident for our sport enthusiasts. He
tells
=
all how to avoid a repetition of the problem. Basically the accident
emanat=
ed from the failure of his motor to start. He has quoted the
number of
exp=
eriences he has personally experienced with motor failures and has
started
=
a war on brands of motors that must be regarded as totally
unreliable.
JOHN ROAKE
EDITOR

One should never rely on the motor to start.........


--
Dan, 5J

On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 7:49:12 AM UTC-8, Dan Marotta wrote:
The engine's failure to start did not cause the accident.Â* The reliance
on the engine to start was one link in the accident chain.

On 11/3/2019 5:23 AM, Paul T wrote:
At 08:04 03 November 2019, wrote:
We at Gliding International have just completed a three months
study on
the=
accident sitution in regard to our sport. We have examined (in
detail)
th=
e 96 reported accidents which show that our problematic area of
soaring
fl=
ight relates to the landing phase.

We took note of all accidents from 1/1/2019 to 31/08/2019 which
indicates
f=
or sure (on the conservative side) that fatalities for the calendar
year
of=
2019 will be 43. No organisation or sport should turn a blind eye
to
what=
is obviously a totally unacceptable situation.

We haven't got an answer to this problem but we are open to
discussion and
=
be a catalyst for change.

Also in our November issue is a report from Sebastian Kawa who
has
personal=
ly set out to explain his recent serious accident. An uphill landing
into
=
a very questionable landing zone with no options. He must be
complimented
=
for writing his report on the accident for our sport enthusiasts. He
tells
=
all how to avoid a repetition of the problem. Basically the accident
emanat=
ed from the failure of his motor to start. He has quoted the
number of
exp=
eriences he has personally experienced with motor failures and has
started
=
a war on brands of motors that must be regarded as totally
unreliable.
JOHN ROAKE
EDITOR

One should never rely on the motor to start.........


--
Dan, 5J

From the Schleicher ASH26E manual: "The powerplant of a powered sailplane must not be regarded as life insurance, for instance when crossing unlandable areas. One must always be prepared for the possibility that the engine will fail to deliver the hoped for propulsion". This was a clear case of pilot error, the sailplane performed as expected.

"No organisation or sport should turn a blind eye to what is obviously a totally unacceptable situation."
It is acceptable otherwise we wouldn't do it. If it is totally unacceptable we should have an immediate indefinite worldwide glider grounding. Be careful how you think and speak about these things.

On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 3:04:36 AM UTC-5, wrote:
We at Gliding International have just completed a three months study on the accident sitution in regard to our sport. We have examined (in detail) the 96 reported accidents which show that our problematic area of soaring flight relates to the landing phase.

We took note of all accidents from 1/1/2019 to 31/08/2019 which indicates for sure (on the conservative side) that fatalities for the calendar year of 2019 will be 43. No organisation or sport should turn a blind eye to what is obviously a totally unacceptable situation.

We haven't got an answer to this problem but we are open to discussion and be a catalyst for change.

Also in our November issue is a report from Sebastian Kawa who has personally set out to explain his recent serious accident. An uphill landing into a very questionable landing zone with no options. He must be complimented for writing his report on the accident for our sport enthusiasts. He tells all how to avoid a repetition of the problem. Basically the accident emanated from the failure of his motor to start. He has quoted the number of experiences he has personally experienced with motor failures and has started a war on brands of motors that must be regarded as totally unreliable.

JOHN ROAKE
EDITOR

The accident did not emanate from the failure of the motor to start. The accident emanated from the fact that the pilot entered into a situation in which there was not a security field for landing within reach of the glider.

On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 11:56:52 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 3:04:36 AM UTC-5, wrote:
We at Gliding International have just completed a three months study on the accident sitution in regard to our sport. We have examined (in detail) the 96 reported accidents which show that our problematic area of soaring flight relates to the landing phase.

We took note of all accidents from 1/1/2019 to 31/08/2019 which indicates for sure (on the conservative side) that fatalities for the calendar year of 2019 will be 43. No organisation or sport should turn a blind eye to what is obviously a totally unacceptable situation.

We haven't got an answer to this problem but we are open to discussion and be a catalyst for change.

Also in our November issue is a report from Sebastian Kawa who has personally set out to explain his recent serious accident. An uphill landing into a very questionable landing zone with no options. He must be complimented for writing his report on the accident for our sport enthusiasts. He tells all how to avoid a repetition of the problem. Basically the accident emanated from the failure of his motor to start. He has quoted the number of experiences he has personally experienced with motor failures and has started a war on brands of motors that must be regarded as totally unreliable.

JOHN ROAKE
EDITOR

The accident did not emanate from the failure of the motor to start. The accident emanated from the fact that the pilot entered into a situation in which there was not a security field for landing within reach of the glider.

On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 11:26:11 AM UTC-8, Mike C wrote:
On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 11:56:52 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 3:04:36 AM UTC-5, wrote:
We at Gliding International have just completed a three months study on the accident sitution in regard to our sport. We have examined (in detail) the 96 reported accidents which show that our problematic area of soaring flight relates to the landing phase.

We took note of all accidents from 1/1/2019 to 31/08/2019 which indicates for sure (on the conservative side) that fatalities for the calendar year of 2019 will be 43. No organisation or sport should turn a blind eye to what is obviously a totally unacceptable situation.

We haven't got an answer to this problem but we are open to discussion and be a catalyst for change.

Also in our November issue is a report from Sebastian Kawa who has personally set out to explain his recent serious accident. An uphill landing into a very questionable landing zone with no options. He must be complimented for writing his report on the accident for our sport enthusiasts. He tells all how to avoid a repetition of the problem. Basically the accident emanated from the failure of his motor to start. He has quoted the number of experiences he has personally experienced with motor failures and has started a war on brands of motors that must be regarded as totally unreliable..

JOHN ROAKE
EDITOR

The accident did not emanate from the failure of the motor to start. The accident emanated from the fact that the pilot entered into a situation in which there was not a security field for landing within reach of the glider.

I thought that electric systems were very dependable.

Mike

So what?

Nobody is saying they are not. Even if you think a motorglider/sustainer engine will start reliably do you think it's sensible to assume it absolutely will and not have a landout option/plan B?

This is the most elementary basic safe operation of a motorglider 101 stuff..

Pretty stupid wording on "cause" used by Gliding International.

On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 2:58:29 PM UTC-5, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Nobody is saying they are not. Even if you think a motorglider/sustainer
engine will start reliably do you think it's sensible to assume it absolutely
will and not have a landout option/plan B?

This is the most elementary basic safe operation of a motorglider 101 stuff.

No, you are flying a GLIDER.
**Plan A** must always be a safe land-out.
Plan B is in the event everything works as intended,
which certainly does not always happen...

On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 12:58:29 PM UTC-7, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 11:26:11 AM UTC-8, Mike C wrote:
On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 11:56:52 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 3:04:36 AM UTC-5, wrote:
We at Gliding International have just completed a three months study on the accident sitution in regard to our sport. We have examined (in detail) the 96 reported accidents which show that our problematic area of soaring flight relates to the landing phase.

We took note of all accidents from 1/1/2019 to 31/08/2019 which indicates for sure (on the conservative side) that fatalities for the calendar year of 2019 will be 43. No organisation or sport should turn a blind eye to what is obviously a totally unacceptable situation.

We haven't got an answer to this problem but we are open to discussion and be a catalyst for change.

Also in our November issue is a report from Sebastian Kawa who has personally set out to explain his recent serious accident. An uphill landing into a very questionable landing zone with no options. He must be complimented for writing his report on the accident for our sport enthusiasts. He tells all how to avoid a repetition of the problem. Basically the accident emanated from the failure of his motor to start. He has quoted the number of experiences he has personally experienced with motor failures and has started a war on brands of motors that must be regarded as totally unreliable.

JOHN ROAKE
EDITOR

The accident did not emanate from the failure of the motor to start. The accident emanated from the fact that the pilot entered into a situation in which there was not a security field for landing within reach of the glider.

I thought that electric systems were very dependable.

Mike

So what?

Nobody is saying they are not. Even if you think a motorglider/sustainer engine will start reliably do you think it's sensible to assume it absolutely will and not have a landout option/plan B?

This is the most elementary basic safe operation of a motorglider 101 stuff.

Pretty stupid wording on "cause" used by Gliding International.

Chuckle.

Never said I thought that. Never have been in a motor glider just thought that the electric system was very reliable, and am surprised to hear that they are not.

Mike