![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just seen on Monday's World News Tonight...
Gaping holes! Lax Security! Nothing like some sensationalism without BALANCE.. Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did you hear what they said?
NBC: 1 Cessna + 200 lb of fertelizer = Oklahoma bombing. ABC: 1 small plane + several lb of C4 = Serious destruction Wow, serious stuff.... But it seems using a Honda Civic + the same amount of bomb material will be much easier than using a GA plane. Unless those targets that are un-accessible by cars, such as White House. That's why we have ADIZ. It is a tough issue to deal with.... Just like buying a virus protection software. It will never protect you from the latest virus attack, no mater how much money you spend, until someone become a victim. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "cpu" wrote in message oups.com... Did you hear what they said? NBC: 1 Cessna + 200 lb of fertelizer = Oklahoma bombing. Really? The Oklahoma bomb was described as a "massive truck bomb" in a rented Ryder truck. A quote: The FBI also changed the size of the bomb numerous times. They originally claimed that it weighed 1,200 pounds, upgraded that figure to 2,000 pounds, then to 4,000 pounds, and finally, they issued a press release stating that the bomb weighed 4800 pounds. :unquote There is also some evidence that if was something much more than just fertilizer and fuel, because similar large fertilizer and fuel bombs had done much less damage in the past.... but then you can read the conspiracy theories all over the internet for yourselves. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Mar 2005 21:51:36 -0800, "cpu" wrote in
.com:: Did you hear what they said? NBC: 1 Cessna + 200 lb of fertelizer = Oklahoma bombing. Doesn't that estimate overlook 55 gallon drums of diesel fuel? ABC: 1 small plane + several lb of C4 = Serious destruction I would imagine several pounds of C4 or any of several other explosives could be as easily deployed by many many other means as by light aircraft. What is the principal difference between those other means and singling out light aircraft? Wow, serious stuff.... I can't believe the TSA & FBI originated those numbers. But it seems using a Honda Civic + the same amount of bomb material will be much easier than using a GA plane. It smells like the airlines are behind this absurd GA alleged insecurity pseudo issue. Perhaps it's time for the media to make a distinction between heavily fuel laden biz-jets and four-place bug smashes. Otherwise, the media hype' of this issue smacks of fear mongering. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
What is the principal difference between those other means and singling out light aircraft? Public ignorance. They're comfortable with trucks, but the vast majority of them don't understand aviation. That makes it easy to convince them we're nothing but spoiled rich brats playing with our expensive toys. It also makes it easy to convince them that the threat of a small plane carrying a ferti-diesel-lizer bomb is feasible. It smells like the airlines are behind this absurd GA alleged insecurity pseudo issue. Perhaps it's time for the media to make a distinction between heavily fuel laden biz-jets and four-place bug smashes. I don't know whether the airlines are behind this. After all, what would they have to gain? But it is easy to conjure any number of conspiracies about who could have something to gain by scaring the public about aviation security and those small planes, in particular. Bureaucratic self-preservation is one, for instance. Otherwise, the media hype' of this issue smacks of fear mongering. Of course it is. -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:53:41 -0500, "John T" wrote in
: : I don't know whether the airlines are behind this. After all, what would they have to gain? Consider the fact that airline passengers must now submit to long lines for degrading security inspections, wait for protracted periods to meet airline schedules, and be treated like cattle. Contrast that with the corporate or charter biz-jet GA experience. I would expect airlines to fear loosing high paying business class customers to the more flexible, more comfortable and less invasive GA fleet. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
Consider the fact that airline passengers must now submit to long lines for degrading security inspections, wait for protracted periods to meet airline schedules, and be treated like cattle. Contrast that with the corporate or charter biz-jet GA experience. I would expect airlines to fear loosing high paying business class customers to the more flexible, more comfortable and less invasive GA fleet. Plausible, but I think unlikely, theory. I seriously doubt there has been a very large movement of business travelers to charter/bizjets. Sure, there are the corporate executives who can occasionally make the justification of paying the still relatively exorbitant rates for private flights, but economic pressures still make waiting in the cattle chutes more feasible for the majority of business travelers. -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actualy I believe the reason the Oklahoma bombing was soo destructive was
not so much the power of the bomb but rather a structural flaw in the design of the building. The truck was parked under a ground level parkade and when detonated actualy lifted part of the building and one of the main horizontal supports was not connected to the rest of the structure. This main support then fell inward from the force of the blast when the weight of the building was no longer holding it in place. Once the pressure from the blast had dissipated, the floors above, now without any support came crashing down. If the main horizontal support had been fastend to the building the destruction may not have been as severe! However things like this and 9/11 bring on the fear mongering by (uneducated or ignorant) john q public and our goverments hell bent on control. Which in turn then takes away more of our rights and feedoms that our fore fathers fought so hard to protect. Flying is just plane fun and something I enjoy immensley. I really get bent out of shape whenever someone starts shouting that the sky is falling and the plane are full of terroists! LOL. well that is my rant for today. Hope everyones day here is full of clear skies and strong tail winds. Gary "Icebound" wrote in message ... "cpu" wrote in message oups.com... Did you hear what they said? NBC: 1 Cessna + 200 lb of fertelizer = Oklahoma bombing. Really? The Oklahoma bomb was described as a "massive truck bomb" in a rented Ryder truck. A quote: The FBI also changed the size of the bomb numerous times. They originally claimed that it weighed 1,200 pounds, upgraded that figure to 2,000 pounds, then to 4,000 pounds, and finally, they issued a press release stating that the bomb weighed 4800 pounds. :unquote There is also some evidence that if was something much more than just fertilizer and fuel, because similar large fertilizer and fuel bombs had done much less damage in the past.... but then you can read the conspiracy theories all over the internet for yourselves. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilots Group Grades U.S. Aviation Security an 'F' | George Patterson | Piloting | 33 | March 13th 05 12:58 PM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
ISRAELI LINK IN US TORTURE TECHNIQUES | MORRIS434 | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 12th 04 05:14 AM |
TSA's General Aviation Airport Security Recommendations Might Become Requirements | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | February 25th 04 05:11 PM |
another "either you are with us ..." story | Jeff Franks | Piloting | 2 | December 31st 03 12:04 AM |