![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Being a student pilot, I'm eating up all kinds of info.
So I go through various instrument info, and then get to the "Mode C Transponder" that sends altitude info. Is that alt info built in? If so, is there no correction for barometric pressure changes? I don't know that it would be severe, but it seems like the window could be +/- 100 feet from day to day that the controllers get from the transponder. Anyone provide some more info on this issue? Thanks! Gary |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "GEG" wrote in message ... Being a student pilot, I'm eating up all kinds of info. So I go through various instrument info, and then get to the "Mode C Transponder" that sends altitude info. Is that alt info built in? If so, is there no correction for barometric pressure changes? I don't know that it would be severe, but it seems like the window could be +/- 100 feet from day to day that the controllers get from the transponder. Anyone provide some more info on this issue? Thanks! There is no barometric adjustment for altitude encoders, they are set to 29.92. The correction for nonstandard pressure is made at the ATC end. It's easy to understand why it's done this way. If the adjustment was made by the pilot he could easily enter the wrong value in his encoder and his altimeter. He'd then be at the wrong altitude and his encoder would provide the same wrong altitude to ATC. By having the adjustment made at the ATC end the radar displays the correct altitude and ATC can advise the pilot of the error. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "GEG" wrote in message ... Being a student pilot, I'm eating up all kinds of info. So I go through various instrument info, and then get to the "Mode C Transponder" that sends altitude info. Is that alt info built in? If so, is there no correction for barometric pressure changes? By the way, it's Kollsman, not Kalisman. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
GEG wrote:
Is that alt info built in? Yes. If so, is there no correction for barometric pressure changes? No. I don't know that it would be severe, but it seems like the window could be +/- 100 feet from day to day that the controllers get from the transponder. True. The equipment at the controllers' end corrects for barometric pressure fluctuations, so the info the controller sees is pretty accurate. George Patterson There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True. The equipment at the controllers' end corrects for barometric
pressure fluctuations, so the info the controller sees is pretty accurate. George Patterson There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes. and when the altimeter settings get loaded into the ATC computer incorrectly.. he sees that everyone is off altitude by the same error factor.. BT |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() and when the altimeter settings get loaded into the ATC computer incorrectly.. he sees that everyone is off altitude by the same error factor.. BT hehehe Good one! Although the separation would at least be correct.... At CLE, they do indeed change it every time the baro setting changes...it is noted in the system every time it is changed. --Don Don Byrer Instrument Pilot Commercial/CFI Student Electronics Technician, RADAR/Data/Comm @ CLE Amateur Radio KJ5KB "I have slipped the surly bonds of earth; now if I can just land without bending the gear..." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don Byrer" wrote in message ... ....snip... hehehe Good one! Although the separation would at least be correct.... ....snip... separation from other aircraft would be correct, but not necessarily from terrain... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe Johnson wrote:
separation from other aircraft would be correct, but not necessarily from terrain... Neither would be correct for long. As soon as the controller tells one of the pilots to fly a particular incorrect altitude and the pilot complies, things will go to hell in a hurry. George Patterson There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message news:TuT6e.6556$ff4.2610@trndny08... Neither would be correct for long. As soon as the controller tells one of the pilots to fly a particular incorrect altitude and the pilot complies, things will go to hell in a hurry. Vertical separation between aircraft would be correct as long as the affected aircraft are on the same altimeter setting. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True. The equipment at the controllers' end corrects for barometric
pressure fluctuations, so the info the controller sees is pretty accurate. In our neck of the woods (NZ) they only apply a correction below the transition altitude - no need for any correction for flight levels. Assume it's the same in the states |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 09:14 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Piloting | 38 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |