Navy removes commander of aircraft carrier hit by coronavirus outbreak

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/02/polit...ved/index.html

Washington (CNN) — The commander of a US aircraft carrier that has been hit by a
major outbreak of coronavirus has been relieved of command days after writing a
memo warning Navy leadership that decisive action was needed to save the lives
of the ship's crew, acting Secretary of the Navy Thomas Modly announced on
Thursday.

"Today at my direction the commanding officer of the USS Theodore Roosevelt,
Captain Brett Crozier, was relieved of command by carrier strike group commander
Rear Admiral Stewart Baker," Modly said during a Pentagon press briefing.

Modly told reporters that Crozier was not removed because of any evidence
suggesting he leaked the memo to the press, but rather for allowing "the
complexity of his challenge with the COVID breakout on the ship to overwhelm his
ability to act professionally when acting professionally was what was needed the
most at the time."

"I have no information nor am I trying to suggest that he leaked the
information. It was published in the San Francisco Chronicle. It all came as a
big surprise to all of us that it was in the paper and that's the first time I
had seen it," he added. "What I will say, he sent it out pretty broadly and in
sending it out broadly he did not take care to ensure that it couldn't be leaked
and that's part of his responsibility in my opinion."

The information in question was contained in a memo written by Crozier earlier
this week to the Navy's Pacific Fleet.

"We are not at war. Sailors do not need to die. If we do not act now, we are
failing to properly take care of our most trusted asset — our Sailors," it read,
three US defense officials confirmed to CNN.

Modly said Crozier was relieved because he went outside the chain of command and
sent his memo over an unsecured system adding to the chances it could be leaked
..

A US defense official told CNN earlier Thursday that 114 sailors from the USS
Theodore Roosevelt have tested positive for the virus.

"Decisive action is required. Removing the majority of personnel from a deployed
US nuclear aircraft carrier and isolating them for two weeks may seem like an
extraordinary measure," he wrote in the memo. "This is a necessary risk. It will
enable the carrier and air wing to get back underway as quickly as possible
while ensuring the health and safety of our Sailors. Keeping over 4,000 young
men and women on board the TR is an unnecessary risk and breaks faith with those
Sailors entrusted to our care."

Modly said Wednesday that if it turned out the letter was leaked it "would
violate the principles of good order and discipline if -- if -- if he were
responsible for that. But, I don't know that. The fact that he wrote the letter
of -- to his chain of command to express his concerns would absolutely not
result in any type of retaliation. This is what we want our commanding officers
to be able to do."

CNN previously reported that some of the sailors from the USS Theodore Roosevelt
will be quarantined in hotel rooms in Guam as the number of coronavirus cases
aboard the carrier continues to increase.

On Wednesday Modly said 1,273 of the ship's roughly 4,800 crew members have been
tested for the virus so far and the Navy was still awaiting the results of some
of those tests.

He said about 1,000 sailors have been evacuated from the ship and moved ashore
to Guam where the ship is currently in port.

"We already have nearly 1,000 personnel off the ship right now. And in the next
couple of days we expect to have 2,700 of them off the ship," Modly told
reporters at the Pentagon.

Some sailors will have to remain on the ship.

The Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. Mike Gilday, said that the ship could not be
evacuated in its entirety due to the need to continue to perform essential tasks
such as the operation of the aircraft carrier's nuclear reactor.

He said that about 1,000 sailors would have to remain on the ship to perform,
about 500 more than was proposed by Crozier in his recent memo.

"This ship has weapons on it, it has munitions on it, it has expensive aircraft,
it has a nuclear power plant. It requires a certain amount of people on that
ship to maintain the safety and security of the ship," Modly said.

The outbreak on the ship is escalating rapidly.

Last week the Pentagon confirmed three sailors on the Roosevelt had tested
positive and that number had risen to 25 two days later. That number rose to at
least 70 on Tuesday and over 100 on Thursday. On Monday, a US defense official
told CNN that a second US aircraft carrier, the USS Ronald Reagan, is also
facing a "handful" of positive cases.




*

Dov wrote in
news
Miloch wrote:

"Today at my direction the commanding officer of the USS Theodore
Roosevelt, Captain Brett Crozier, was relieved of command by carrier
strike group commander Rear Admiral Stewart Baker," Modly said during
a Pentagon press briefing.


It's simply normal that an emotive panicker --and probably sneaky
leaker-- be demoted.

What's worrying is that a man with so little judgment could ever have
been appointed to command a CVN.
Whatever it's called, the Navy's "HR department" in charge of
selecting and vetting senior officers has a lot of self-examination to
do.

This time, their failure can simply be sorted out by a dishonorable
discharge or whatever, but who knows how many other unreliable
officers have commands beyond their ability?


Were the officers who told the press
about the My Lai massacre also "unreliable"?
Should that have been kept from the public
as well?

On Fri, 03 Apr 2020 11:45:03 +0200, Dov wrote:

Miloch wrote:

"Today at my direction the commanding officer of the USS Theodore Roosevelt,
Captain Brett Crozier, was relieved of command by carrier strike group commander
Rear Admiral Stewart Baker," Modly said during a Pentagon press briefing.


It's simply normal that an emotive panicker --and probably sneaky leaker-- be
demoted.

What's worrying is that a man with so little judgment could ever have been
appointed to command a CVN.
Whatever it's called, the Navy's "HR department" in charge of selecting and
vetting senior officers has a lot of self-examination to do.

This time, their failure can simply be sorted out by a dishonorable discharge or
whatever, but who knows how many other unreliable officers have commands beyond
their ability?

Dov

28 years of service, with this (public) record:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_...nd_decorations

on his 2th major command. You're saying this is an "emotive panicler"?
Should he then have kept quiet until his ship was full of infected
personel?