![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am doing some preliminary planning of the panel for my RV-9A and
wondering if a 2nd nav is really a necessity with a GNS 430 in the panel. Seems to me that flying IFR GPS, with mostly GPS approaches in the near future, I should not have much need for a 2nd VOR receiver to identify intersections - obviously the GPS does that itself and the 430 does have one nav radio built-in. Only problematic area I can think of are the cases where 2 VOR receivers are pretty much necessary - to identify FAFs on ILS, LOC, and VOR (no GPS overlay) approaches. I release that ILS's almost always have an OM anyway and VOR IAPs w/no GPS overlay become scarcer by the month. With WAAS.. much less of a problem all around (WAAS precision approaches). If I decide I can do without another nav I save $2000 going with a SL-40 (com only) vs a SL-30 (nav/com). Interesting in hearing from people with 430s (and up) how they are flying the things. (As for navigating with the 430 tango uniform - there's ATC vectors & the backup handheld GPS.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|