![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a CRANKSHAFT GEAR RETAINING BOLT AD 2004-10-14 effective June 25,
2004, which redefines "prop-strike" and states: "(e) Compliance with this AD is required as indicated before further flight if the engine experiences a propeller strike after the effective date of this AD, as defined in paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD. " There is some disagreement amongst some of us whether this AD demands 1. replacement of the retaining bolt & lockplate after the effective date of the AD on ALL "prop-strikes" -as newly defined- occuring BEFORE&AFTER the AD or whether the AD demands only 2. replacement of the retaining bolt & lockplate ONLY on "prop-strikes"- as newly defined- occuring AFTER the effective date of the AD. Does anyone have experience or information to clarify this for me? My interpretation is (2). Thanks, Tien PS: on my pre-purchase inspection of a Cessna 177, we found this AD was not complied with, but we wonder if it is applicable since the incident was before the effective date of the AD. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Prop strike effect on resale value? | John Doe | Owning | 12 | November 24th 05 12:34 AM |
my ignorance | LCT Paintball | Home Built | 25 | April 9th 05 06:54 PM |
Prop Strike Query | Dick | Home Built | 12 | November 16th 04 02:20 AM |
Prop Strike in Milwaukee | Ben Smith | Piloting | 9 | October 1st 04 11:21 PM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |