![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to know the advantages and disadvantages of these
aircraft. They have aproximately the same performance with a significant difference in the fuel consumption. What about maintenance cost? Please post your comments. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Useful load of an Arrow is no where near that of a Skylane. THAT is the
main difference, IMHO. For a fairer comparison, you need to compare a Piper Pathfinder/Dakota with the Skylane. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Useful load of an Arrow is no where near that of a Skylane. THAT is the main difference, IMHO. For a fairer comparison, you need to compare a Piper Pathfinder/Dakota with the Skylane. Besides what Jay mentioned, the Skylane is roomier than the Arrow... the two doors makes it a lot easier to get in and out. The Skylane will cost you a lot more to buy but may be a bit less to maintain. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() kontiki wrote: Besides what Jay mentioned, the Skylane is roomier than the Arrow... the two doors makes it a lot easier to get in and out. The Skylane will cost you a lot more to buy but may be a bit less to maintain. Also, not all skylane's are retracts... All arrows to my knowledge are. The retractable gear adds cost and complexity. Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....For a fairer comparison, you need to compare a Piper Arrow with
the Cessna Cardinal (177). -- Paul "Jay Honeck" a écrit dans le message de news: 5fMse.80709$xm3.77623@attbi_s21... Useful load of an Arrow is no where near that of a Skylane. THAT is the main difference, IMHO. For a fairer comparison, you need to compare a Piper Pathfinder/Dakota with the Skylane. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Paul" wrote)
...For a fairer comparison, you need to compare a Piper Arrow with the Cessna Cardinal (177). 177 RG :-) Montblack |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
Dave S wrote: Also, not all skylane's are retracts... All arrows to my knowledge are. The retractable gear adds cost and complexity. The non-retractable version of the Arrow is the Archer, which is also missing the constant-speed prop. In my opinion, the only advantage the Arrow has over the Archer is range due to the ability to load more fuel. I'm not sure that advantage is worth the extra cost in maintenance and insurance. JKG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Goodish writes:
In article et, Dave S wrote: Also, not all skylane's are retracts... All arrows to my knowledge are. The retractable gear adds cost and complexity. The non-retractable version of the Arrow is the Archer, which is also missing the constant-speed prop. In my opinion, the only advantage the Arrow has over the Archer is range due to the ability to load more fuel. I'm not sure that advantage is worth the extra cost in maintenance and insurance. Is the Arrow any faster than the Archer? -jav |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Javier Henderson wrote: In my opinion, the only advantage the Arrow has over the Archer is range due to the ability to load more fuel. I'm not sure that advantage is worth the extra cost in maintenance and insurance. Is the Arrow any faster than the Archer? Yes, as you would expect given the reduced drag from the gear. However, I don't believe the speed advantage is any more than 15kts or so, which isn't much for the increase in insurance and maintenance costs. You can get the same performance out of fixed-gear, fixed pitch prop airplanes like the Tiger. JKG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Goodish writes:
In article , Javier Henderson wrote: In my opinion, the only advantage the Arrow has over the Archer is range due to the ability to load more fuel. I'm not sure that advantage is worth the extra cost in maintenance and insurance. Is the Arrow any faster than the Archer? Yes, as you would expect given the reduced drag from the gear. However, I don't believe the speed advantage is any more than 15kts or so, which isn't much for the increase in insurance and maintenance costs. You can get the same performance out of fixed-gear, fixed pitch prop airplanes like the Tiger. Hm.. I've owned a couple of Tigers, I'd get about 135KTAS on the average. I thought the Arrow would be closer to 150 KTAS? -jav |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How safe is it, really? | June | Piloting | 227 | December 10th 04 05:01 AM |
Anti collision light mod for Piper Arrow 1968 model? | Frode Berg | Owning | 4 | May 20th 04 05:16 AM |
$15,000 Cash for a Cessna 152 Or Piper Tomahawk | MRQB | Aviation Marketplace | 17 | February 15th 04 12:05 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Piper Archer III or Cessna 172SP | Dale Harwell | Owning | 10 | July 15th 03 04:01 AM |