![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm contemplating a flight from the Philly area to Cape Cod. My
biggest concern is the huge Class B area that encompasses Newark and the New York Airports. I often fly around the Philly Bravo with little in the way of route disruption. It will, however be a long way around this airspace. My question is this: is it unreasonable (or unsafe) to consider flying over the New York Bravo? That would make my trip much more direct. I doubt that I would get clearance to fly through. I also doubt that I would be able to get flight following. I am a little concerned about flying over the Bravo, especially considering Maule Driver's recent post about overflying Philly's space. If I do fly over the Bravo, should I call approach and give them a heads-up about my intentions (and maybe get flight following that way) or are they too busy to be concerned with a VFR flyover? Thanks. Rich Russell |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rich,
I have flown over, under and through the New York Class B. Over is just fine but getting up there may take a while. If you do not mind water going under is quite doable. You can fly under around the east side. Only about 10 minutes over water and lots of time saved. You can ever call them up and ask to go through. 5500 north bound Directly over JFK the out to Calverton VOR. Michelle RNR wrote: I'm contemplating a flight from the Philly area to Cape Cod. My biggest concern is the huge Class B area that encompasses Newark and the New York Airports. I often fly around the Philly Bravo with little in the way of route disruption. It will, however be a long way around this airspace. My question is this: is it unreasonable (or unsafe) to consider flying over the New York Bravo? That would make my trip much more direct. I doubt that I would get clearance to fly through. I also doubt that I would be able to get flight following. I am a little concerned about flying over the Bravo, especially considering Maule Driver's recent post about overflying Philly's space. If I do fly over the Bravo, should I call approach and give them a heads-up about my intentions (and maybe get flight following that way) or are they too busy to be concerned with a VFR flyover? Thanks. Rich Russell |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regarding my post - please don't read into my reflections that there was
anything wrong with my flight. Because of the way I've been flying (generally IFR), I found a non-talking VFR a flight a bit strange. Having said that, I've found NY ATC very accomodating when they can be. I'd say that an over the top flight is fine, weather permitting. Give it a full 1,000 ft clearance and talk to them. Good advice given by Jose and others in my thread. Though it doesn't directly relate to your flight, one of the most beautiful flights I've done recently was KHPN to Durham IFR. I planned and expected to be cleared somewhere out over Jersey. It was a beautiful dawn over NYC and I was cleared directly over JFK at 5,000. Despite 4 or 5 departures having to halt their ascents until seeing or clearing me, it appeared to be no problem. And again, all quite beautiful. RNR wrote: I'm contemplating a flight from the Philly area to Cape Cod. My biggest concern is the huge Class B area that encompasses Newark and the New York Airports. I often fly around the Philly Bravo with little in the way of route disruption. It will, however be a long way around this airspace. My question is this: is it unreasonable (or unsafe) to consider flying over the New York Bravo? That would make my trip much more direct. I doubt that I would get clearance to fly through. I also doubt that I would be able to get flight following. I am a little concerned about flying over the Bravo, especially considering Maule Driver's recent post about overflying Philly's space. If I do fly over the Bravo, should I call approach and give them a heads-up about my intentions (and maybe get flight following that way) or are they too busy to be concerned with a VFR flyover? Thanks. Rich Russell |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rich, remember to look out for all the Maule traffic around the Class B!
Michelle P wrote: Rich, I have flown over, under and through the New York Class B. Over is just fine but getting up there may take a while. If you do not mind water going under is quite doable. You can fly under around the east side. Only about 10 minutes over water and lots of time saved. You can ever call them up and ask to go through. 5500 north bound Directly over JFK the out to Calverton VOR. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:03:36 GMT, Michelle P
wrote: Rich, I have flown over, under and through the New York Class B. Over is just fine but getting up there may take a while. If you do not mind water going under is quite doable. You can fly under around the east side. Only about 10 minutes over water and lots of time saved. You can ever call them up and ask to go through. 5500 north bound Directly over JFK the out to Calverton VOR. Michelle Thanks for the reply. I have been considering flying under the east side and may still do that. Rich Russell |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flying IFR into and out of the NY Class B is definitely the easiest,
but I've come in a few times via FF and that worked out just as easily as IFR. Just be on your toes and don't miss a radio call from them, as things can get _very_ hectic in short order. One of the best flights I ever had was flying from Sky Acres airport (about 8 miles NNE of Poughkeepsie) up to 8500 feet, directly over LGA, east of the East River over Queens & Brooklyn, then descending through the Class B, rounding the southern tip of Manhattan, back up the Hudson, and then direct from about Central Park to Caldwell airport, all while talking to NY Approach. They were incredibly accomodating, and I could tell they definitely appreciated the call up as I approached from the north. Even though I would've been well above their airspace, I figured it couldn't hurt to be talking to them, so definitely give them a call up... you'll get some traffic calls for planes departing EWR, JFK, and LGA, so maybe plan ahead and figure out which runways are active at each airport... then you'll know exactly where to look for departing traffic. -- Guy Elden Jr. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:28:52 GMT, Maule Driver
wrote: Regarding my post - please don't read into my reflections that there was anything wrong with my flight. Because of the way I've been flying (generally IFR), I found a non-talking VFR a flight a bit strange. Having said that, I've found NY ATC very accomodating when they can be. I'd say that an over the top flight is fine, weather permitting. Give it a full 1,000 ft clearance and talk to them. Good advice given by Jose and others in my thread. snipped... Thanks Maule. I don't think I'm reading too much into your comments. You did, however, reinforce in my mind the slightly unsettling feeling that I get when I realize that I'm the traffic that ATC is warning someone about. I can see how a VFR flight over the Bravo would be condidered a nuisance by ATC, even though it is legal. I'd like to talk to them, but I'm not too proud to admit that I'm a little intimidated about talking to those rapid-fire New York controllers. I've flown the VFR exclusion up the Hudson River before but I've never communicatd with NY approach. That flight was all self-announcing. Rich Russell |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RNR wrote:
My question is this: is it unreasonable (or unsafe) to consider flying over the New York Bravo? That would make my trip much more direct. Quite reasonable -- I've done it a few times. Another solution is to fly up the Hudson at 900' to just past the northern tip of Manhattan island, climb to 1,400', turn right, and fly along the northern shore of Long Island sound. That's the way I went up the last time I flew up there. Personally, I would approach Newark airspace at something like 2500' or more and contact Newark ATC as soon as practical. Try to get clearance through the class-B (can't hurt). If that's denied, I would drop down and shoot the Hudson corridor. You can also stay under the B and skirt the southern shore of Long Island for a very direct route, but you'll have a fair amount of water to cross if you go that way. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RNR wrote:
I can see how a VFR flight over the Bravo would be condidered a nuisance by ATC, even though it is legal. ATC wasn't warning anyone about me when I flew over New York. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Rich,
I've found that it's much easier to get a clearance into the NY Class B coming in from the West. I would definitely give it a try before you trek up and over the airspace. It's really no big deal. Just have a plan of where your route will be. Typically the controllers will route you right over JFK then over FRG. Just make sure you keep your assigned heading and altitude. It's also pretty exhilarating flying over JFK with 747's and 767's flying underneath you. If you're uncomfortable going through, then I would also no go underneath. It's a bit more complex since you'll be going along the south shore of Long Island at 500 ft. and the Class B does not overlap the land exactly. Sometimes the traffic can get hectic under there as well since it acts like a funnel for transitioning traffic. I've done it many times and it's quite a cool experience. Good luck in whatever you do but I would definitely try getting a clearance through first. Regards, Marco Leon "RNR" wrote in message ... I'm contemplating a flight from the Philly area to Cape Cod. My biggest concern is the huge Class B area that encompasses Newark and the New York Airports. I often fly around the Philly Bravo with little in the way of route disruption. It will, however be a long way around this airspace. My question is this: is it unreasonable (or unsafe) to consider flying over the New York Bravo? That would make my trip much more direct. I doubt that I would get clearance to fly through. I also doubt that I would be able to get flight following. I am a little concerned about flying over the Bravo, especially considering Maule Driver's recent post about overflying Philly's space. If I do fly over the Bravo, should I call approach and give them a heads-up about my intentions (and maybe get flight following that way) or are they too busy to be concerned with a VFR flyover? Thanks. Rich Russell Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|