Garmin ad in AOPA pilot

Maybe my math is rusty but it seems that the ETEs for the 130kt displays for
the 396 on the back cover are wrong. The 150kt displays seem correct.

Yeah, it's a little off, but maybe the speed just changed and the
recalculation hasn't caught up yet.

Rod

"lardsoup" wrote in message
...
Maybe my math is rusty but it seems that the ETEs for the 130kt displays
for
the 396 on the back cover are wrong. The 150kt displays seem correct.

Maybe my math is rusty but it seems that the ETEs for the 130kt displays for
the 396 on the back cover are wrong. The 150kt displays seem correct.

What do you do for fun?


Tony

--

Tony Roberts
PP-ASEL
VFR OTT
Night
Cessna 172H C-GICE

Fly airplanes. But really. The display shows the ground speed as 130kts;
the distance to travel as 398nm and the time as 13:16. So it's either 13
minutes or 13 hours. Both seem very wrong.

lardsoup wrote:
Fly airplanes. But really. The display shows the ground speed as 130kts;
the distance to travel as 398nm and the time as 13:16. So it's either 13
minutes or 13 hours. Both seem very wrong.

Magazine GPSs aren't approved for navigation.

In article
,
"lardsoup" wrote:
Fly airplanes. But really. The display shows the ground speed as 130kts;
the distance to travel as 398nm and the time as 13:16. So it's either 13
minutes or 13 hours. Both seem very wrong.


New featu time travel. It's not as big as XM weather, but it must be
in one of the menus somewhere.


JKG

Jonathan Goodish wrote:

New featu time travel.Â*Â*It'sÂ*notÂ*asÂ*bigÂ*asÂ*XMÂ*weather,Â*b utÂ*itÂ*mustÂ*be
in one of the menus somewhere.


It was added to the Garmin 2995, but retrofitted.

- Andrew