![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you would like to have the finest low-loss, light-weight coax cable
for your aircraft radio installations, get Andrew FSJ1-50A Heliax Superflexible Foam Cable. It's pricier than the RG's, but the performance is so far superior that your com, VOR, Xpndr, and whatever will give you range performance like you've never seen. Andrew also has a matching BNC male connector, the F1PBM. The cable is rated at 6.4kW peak power, minimum bend radius of 1", and 0.54 oz/ft. Compare that to RG58 at 0.35oz/ft. It is 0.29" OD, whereas RG58 is o.116" Isolation or leakage is at least 300dB due to the solid outer jacket, vs 45dB at best for RG58, and more likely 25dB after being flexed around. Anyone who uses an RG cable in their aircraft with this stuff available doesn't really care about good radio rx/tx! Check out their catalog pages on www.andrew.com . |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ELIPPSE wrote:
If you would like to have the finest low-loss, light-weight coax cable for your aircraft radio installations, get Andrew FSJ1-50A Heliax Superflexible Foam Cable. It's pricier than the RG's, but the performance is so far superior that your com, VOR, Xpndr, and whatever will give you range performance like you've never seen. Andrew also has a matching BNC male connector, the F1PBM. The cable is rated at 6.4kW peak power, minimum bend radius of 1", and 0.54 oz/ft. Compare that to RG58 at 0.35oz/ft. It is 0.29" OD, whereas RG58 is o.116" Isolation or leakage is at least 300dB due to the solid outer jacket, vs 45dB at best for RG58, and more likely 25dB after being flexed around. Anyone who uses an RG cable in their aircraft with this stuff available doesn't really care about good radio rx/tx! Check out their catalog pages on www.andrew.com . Between this and the props . . . . Hey man this isn't rec.aviation.marketing! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
UltraJohn wrote:
ELIPPSE wrote: If you would like to have the finest low-loss, light-weight coax cable for your aircraft radio installations, get Andrew FSJ1-50A Heliax Superflexible Foam Cable. It's pricier than the RG's, but the performance is so far superior that your com, VOR, Xpndr, and whatever will give you range performance like you've never seen. Andequipmentas a matching BNC male connector, the F1PBM. The cable is rated at 6.4kW peak power, minimum bend radius of 1", and 0.54 oz/ft. Compare that to RG58 at 0.35oz/ft. It is 0.29" OD, whereas RG58 is o.116" Isolation or leakage is at least 300dB due to the solid outer jacket, vs 45dB at best for RG58, and more likely 25dB after being flexed around. Anyone who uses an RG cable in their aircraft with this stuff available doesn't really care about good radio rx/tx! Check out their catalog pages on www.andrew.com . Between this and the props . . . . Hey man this isn't rec.aviation.marketing! Replying tomy own! It was mainly meant for the other posts he sent at the same time touting the same prop in an obvious marketing ploy. Now as far as the cable goes. Hey at lest than 20 feet for most runs you don't need heliax and actually 58 is usable for most. There are plenty of better than 58 available locally such as some of the micro rg8's. also as you stated your heliax is twice+ the size so that can be a concern and also your quote of 300db. . well I can't prove otherwise but I doubt it. In any case the equipment and connectors you use it with has so much more leakage than that that it would be overkill if it did have 300db isolation. Lastly who needs cable rated at 6.4kw for transmitters running 5 watt (comms) to maybe a couple hundred (transponders)? Anyway I'm sure its great cable, Andrews is a very reputable company but it is way overkill for most homebuilders! John |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Heliax is fine cable - just what you need to run
up a tower (it comes in many sizes). But in an airplane? Like the man said - it's overkill. I'd recommend RG142. As for the isolation - engineers have an inside joke that goes something like this: Oh say can you see..... Three Hundred Dee Bee.... This is a range greater than that between the smallest detectable signal to an unimaginable amount of power. In other words, it doesn't exist in the natural world. AFAIK, nobody makes anything with "300 dB of isolation". Any engineers out there who would care to comment? David Johnson |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I missed the original post, so...
What was the original poster's concern about isolation? I'm not aware of any repeaters in use aboard aircraft. Is he worried about signals leaking out of the coax of say com1 transmitting and getting into the receiver of com2? I wouldn't think there would be much need to worry...more RF will get into the com2 receiver by the RF leaving the antenna. Seems to me that no matter what kind of "isolation" the coax cable has, the worst thing that can happen is that he would experience a little desense on com2 receive while he's transmitting on com1, but it wouldn't make too much difference...if he's talking on com1, he won't be able to concentrate too much on what is being received on com2 anyway... RG-142 is nice cable, but it's not quite as flexible as RG58. The loss in 10 or 20 feet of RG58 isn't really worth the extra cost in my opinion... Scott wrote: Andrew Heliax is fine cable - just what you need to run up a tower (it comes in many sizes). But in an airplane? Like the man said - it's overkill. I'd recommend RG142. As for the isolation - engineers have an inside joke that goes something like this: Oh say can you see..... Three Hundred Dee Bee.... This is a range greater than that between the smallest detectable signal to an unimaginable amount of power. In other words, it doesn't exist in the natural world. AFAIK, nobody makes anything with "300 dB of isolation". Any engineers out there who would care to comment? David Johnson |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
I missed the original post, so... me too... [...] On experimental planes, we don't realy need better than RG58. Who need more than 2m/6ft long cable? If you see the difference beetwen the best cable and a RG58, on 6ft long you can't realy get a real better signal on the air with a better cable. By -- minicab F-PRAZ Philippe Vessaire Ò¿Ó¬ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
: RG-142 is nice cable, but it's not quite as flexible as RG58. The loss : in 10 or 20 feet of RG58 isn't really worth the extra cost in my opinion... ... and at least the stuff I tried in my PA-28 had a copper-clad steel center conductor. It screwed the compass when run up the support between the two halves of the windscreen. I had to re-swap it back to RG-58 (MIL-C-17). Stupid compass.... ![]() -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss * * Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I worked with an X-band extreme-accuracy Atlas guidance radar at
Vandenberg AFB. It was necessary to have at least 150dB isolation to prevent interference in our test simulator. Solid jacket cable was the only thing that would allow this kind of performance. The Andrew cable was also the only kind that did not generate noise when flexed or vibrated, which was very important in our test operations. Remember that the transponder puts out 100W-400W peak. Leaking cables in close proximity can cross couple. Cable leakage also effects the apparent radiation pattern of antennas, generating undesired sidelobes and cancellations. Consider the 20' long com run from the instrument panel to the antenna buried in the tip sail of the VariEZ or LongEZ that passes near the extreme RFI generated by the engine's ignition. Has anyone ever had spark noise in their com radio? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DME and the transponder are in the 960MHz to 1215MHz range. At 1GHz,
RG58 has 17.5dB/100ft., RG142 has 13.0dB/100ft., and FSJ1-50A has 6.0dB/100ft. If I was operating under extreme conditions, I would want the best performing equipment available to me. Sometimes 1dB can make the difference between getting a signal or not! Ask the guys talking to the spacecraft out among the planets. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Antenna ground plane and coax grounding | G. Fred McCutchen | Home Built | 2 | August 8th 04 12:27 PM |
Switching radios on 1 antenna | Nicholas J. Hirsch | Home Built | 16 | June 14th 04 01:49 PM |
Tefzel Wire, RG400 Coax, Crimpers, Terminals, etc.. | Stein Bruch | Home Built | 0 | September 20th 03 04:35 AM |
Military helmet, civilian radios - my solution | Dave Hyde | Home Built | 7 | September 16th 03 01:20 AM |
Transponders, Radios and other avionics procurement questions | Corky Scott | Home Built | 5 | July 2nd 03 11:27 PM |