![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will fully admit that I have several steps to go, so I don't want it to sound as if I think this is something I will accomplish soon. Rather, I am trying to identify the best path.
A little back ground... I am 36 years old and grew up at the airport mainly around sailplanes. I soloed at 14, and got my private glider license at 16. I have about 100 hrs of sailplane time. Went to college and did very little flying after that time. Last year I picked up my SEL private and I have about 150 hrs of "airplane" (power) time. 250 TT. I recently finished my instrument rating. I have about 55 hrs Complex time in an Arrow and about 100 hrs. in 172's. Here is where things get interesting. My father has an A36 and I was working towards flying that and I thought we were getting to where we could see the "light at the end of the tunnel". He has about 2,500 hrs. and has just decided he wants to move up to a 58 Baron. I see "the light" dimming and fading out. Insurance drives a great deal of this, but, of course, practicality and safety are even more important. What is the next thing to do? Should I fly the Mooney at the local flight school and just build complex time? Or, should I get my MEL and try and build multi time? Why does it seem it might be easier to rent the local Cougar or Travelair than it is to get covered in a Baron owned by a family member ? Yes, any experience is good, but what are some of the best options as far as the next step? Any thoughts appreciated. RC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I had a father who was buying a Baron...I'd get the multi-engine rating
right away. Time in the Arrow will not get you a high-performance endorsement. Kill three birds with one stone. The Baron will get you a multi-engine rating and complex time and a high performance endorsement. You will also be ready to fly that twin when the time comes. Now all this is assuming you can justify the massive increase in fuel burn and multiplying that times 2, the increase engine amortization and multiplying that by 2 and the insurance increase (not sure what that is). I would also assume that you'd have to kick in a small maintenance amortization per hour too. No?!? Kobra |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-10-31, super90 wrote:
Insurance drives a great deal of this, but, of course, practicality and safety are even more important. You'll also need to build serious time, too. In my limited experience of multi engine airplanes and insurance, you'll need *at least* 500TT to be insurable on a multi at any price (and a good proportion of these hours should be in something high performance AND complex - i.e. the newer Mooneys or a Bonanza). Plus some multi time too (you'll probably need at least 25 in type before you're insurable at any price - of course, you can do this in the Baron with an MEI). -- Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I should clarify a bit. Currently, we live in different cities, so I won't have access to the airplane for a year or so. That's why I am trying to figure out "the path".
From that standpoint, I guess the MEL rating would be good and then build time in the local Cougar or Travelair. Seems like the name of the game will be "multi" hours. There are just not hardly any well equiped twins in the area. They are all run-out trainers. Thanks, RC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I should clarify a bit. Currently, we live in different cities, so I
won't have access to the airplane for a year or so. That's why I am trying to figure out "the path". For the money you'd spend getting competent and insurable in a twin, maybe "the path" is to take that money and buy your own single. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
most multi engine "training" aircraft will not get you the high performance
endorsement.. unless there is a loop hole to add up the combined engine horsepower. Seminoles, Beech Duchess, Twin Comanche and most Seneca's have 200 or less per side. Sounds like dad is trying to stay one step ahead of what you are qualified to fly. BT "Kobra" wrote in message ... If I had a father who was buying a Baron...I'd get the multi-engine rating right away. Time in the Arrow will not get you a high-performance endorsement. Kill three birds with one stone. The Baron will get you a multi-engine rating and complex time and a high performance endorsement. You will also be ready to fly that twin when the time comes. Now all this is assuming you can justify the massive increase in fuel burn and multiplying that times 2, the increase engine amortization and multiplying that by 2 and the insurance increase (not sure what that is). I would also assume that you'd have to kick in a small maintenance amortization per hour too. No?!? Kobra |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose,
I thinking you might be right. A thought that came up today was to find a good, well cared for 35 or 33 Bonanza with some sort of relatively modern avionics and find a partner in it. Nothing too fancy, just a good servicable machine with a full IFR panel in it and some sort of IFR cert. GPS. Like you say, the numbers might be advantageous that route. I have been spending $2,500 to $3,000 a month working on the instrument rating and building time. Of course, that included instructor time, and I was flying two and three days a week. Also seems that working on a Commercial would help the insurance too. Still brainstorming, but you fellows have some good ideas. That's why I asked in the first place!! Thanks, RC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
super90 wrote:
Also seems that working on a Commercial would help the insurance too. well, I got a discount with my renter insurance when I got the instrument rating, but the commercial certificate didn't make a difference in their opinion... --Sylvain |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sylvain wrote:
super90 wrote: Also seems that working on a Commercial would help the insurance too. well, I got a discount with my renter insurance when I got the instrument rating, but the commercial certificate didn't make a difference in their opinion... Passengers like it though... -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When insuring our Aztec, we found very few underwriters (3 if I remember
right) willing to insure "transition twin pilots" i.e. transitioning into a twin. Our lowest time/rated partner (the one the insurance is primarily based on) had less than 500 hours, is PPL and IR. We all did our multi training just before purchasing the Aztec, so we all had very low twin time. Myself and one other partner are Commercial and IR, I'm a CFII and he's also ASES. Only our PPL partner was required to fly 25 hours with an MEI before solo in the Aztec. We were told (right or wrong) that our Commercial certs and other ratings helped our cause. Our broker told us more underwriters were interested and we got more quotes because of it. Maybe he was just blowing smoke up our butt, but if it's true, then this is what I would concentrate on: Get your commercial certificate and build your time above 500 hours, then get your multi rating. If you get your multi first and you save your money for hours of twin flying, the hour building will slow dramatically. Your best investment will be to build your time in a single, it will save you some serious insurance premium bucks when you move into the Baron. YMMV Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LINDA WEST of Chipman Moving & Storage/CHIPMAN UNITED VAN LINES likes to commit Fraud & Forgery likes to commit Fraud & Forgery | capaliwoda | Piloting | 0 | October 13th 05 04:08 PM |
Engine moving day... | Gene Z. Ragan | Home Built | 2 | March 16th 04 01:26 AM |
Red Baron vs. Rickenbacker? | Gregorso | Military Aviation | 28 | October 13th 03 07:26 PM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 137 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Piloting | 131 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |