![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm aware that B-17s attacked Japanese Shipping during WW2 (battle of Midway comes to mind), but that they were way too high and didn't hit anything. Speaking hypothetically, would it have radically improved anthing if the B-17 attacked from a much lower altitude? I'm thinking that the B-17 was a pretty tough plane, as proven over bombing raids in Europe. And wonder if it could survive the AA and CAP that the Japanese put up that so easily downed the Vindicators? Speed and multiple engines come to mind. Still, would bombing accuracy have improved to a point that hitting a Japanses CV would have been possible. I have this (crazy?) picture of a B-17 lining up with a Japanese carrier (lengthwise) and dropping a stick of bombs on it. Wonder what the spread would be at different speeds and the intervals between bombs. Thanks, to the SBDs, this was not needed, but just curious. Come to think of it, the Carriers would and did perform evasive movements, so skip that requirement that the B-17 would line up with the keel of the carriers. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GlobalFlyer -- Pacific Jet Stream Charts? | Montblack | Piloting | 10 | March 3rd 05 10:10 AM |
Transient visit to the Pacific Northwest | sprack | Piloting | 5 | May 5th 04 05:57 AM |
Modern day propeller fighter - hypothetical | Nev | Military Aviation | 38 | December 6th 03 05:39 AM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
Attn: Garmin GPS Users with Pacific International Databases - We need your help! | Colin Southern | Piloting | 0 | October 29th 03 09:57 PM |