![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gentlemen,
Thank you for your recent answers on medical/eyesight/keratoconus issues and the recommendation to take it to the AOPA. This sounds like a winner which I'll pursue. Since I don't anticipate being able to actually pay real money to fly a real bird and pursue my ticket until earl-ish in '07 I'd nonetheless like to gain a little experience with the instruments and flight characteristics. Keep in mind that from skydiving I would estimate that I have (based on avg climb to jump altitude) about 150hrs in C-182/205-6/210 + 150hrs in Twin Otters + 150hrs in King Air/Twin Bo...all as passenger but usually I'm up front (video guy) and paying attention...and I have spent some time in the right seat (and flown) the 182/210 and the Twin Otter. I have some feel for the aircraft. On the humorous hand I have only a handful of landings in any aircraft from the right seat or anywhere else in the aircraft come to think of it. Remind me to tell you guys what happens in Cessna 402(?) (twin- low wing, business, tiny door) when you stick 9 jumpers + 1 pilot + full fuel + August in Houston + no wind (can you say air density altitude? g). Would something like Microsoft's Flight Simulator be a benefit to familiarization? Or would it be a detriment to overcome when training actually starts? Thanks again and blue skies! Richard Smith D-11950 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard" wrote in message
... [...] Would something like Microsoft's Flight Simulator be a benefit to familiarization? Or would it be a detriment to overcome when training actually starts? See previous threads on the topic for details. It comes up every now and then. Short answer: PC flight sims can help with learning procedures, but they are harder to fly than real airplanes, and you can get into some poor habits with respect to focusing on the instruments rather than looking outside. IMHO, as long as you're aware of these issues they are not big problems. But you probably aren't going to gain a whole heck of a lot from using a PC flight sim either. You can learn some things, but you'll spend as much time unlearning some things as you gain in other areas through early exposure. If you want to fly a PC sim ahead of time for the fun of it, by all means do so. Don't worry too much about it hurting you in the long run. But don't expect it to help you much either. Note that using it *during* flight training can help you learn procedures faster, and without causing bad habits to become ingrained as well (since you'll be learning the good habits simultaneously, or even in advance). Last I heard, the Navy was still incorporating MSFS into their flight training program with good success. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard wrote:
Gentlemen, Thank you for your recent answers on medical/eyesight/keratoconus issues and the recommendation to take it to the AOPA. This sounds like a winner which I'll pursue. Since I don't anticipate being able to actually pay real money to fly a real bird and pursue my ticket until earl-ish in '07 I'd nonetheless like to gain a little experience with the instruments and flight characteristics. Keep in mind that from skydiving I would estimate that I have (based on avg climb to jump altitude) about 150hrs in C-182/205-6/210 + 150hrs in Twin Otters + 150hrs in King Air/Twin Bo...all as passenger but usually I'm up front (video guy) and paying attention...and I have spent some time in the right seat (and flown) the 182/210 and the Twin Otter. I have some feel for the aircraft. On the humorous hand I have only a handful of landings in any aircraft from the right seat or anywhere else in the aircraft come to think of it. Remind me to tell you guys what happens in Cessna 402(?) (twin- low wing, business, tiny door) when you stick 9 jumpers + 1 pilot + full fuel + August in Houston + no wind (can you say air density altitude? g). Would something like Microsoft's Flight Simulator be a benefit to familiarization? Or would it be a detriment to overcome when training actually starts? Thanks again and blue skies! Richard Smith D-11950 For learning to fly, definitely NO. I "flew" MS Flight Sim for a long, long time before really learning to fly. But....it does do a decent job of teaching what the flight instruments do and how they all work together. It does however have you keeping your head in the cockpit. When learning you'll be VFR so you'll need to be looking outside. As your training progress and maybe even to the instrument rating I think it really shines there, especially for about $40 or less! You'll be able to intercept and track VORs pretty realistically. Once you start your training though I'd stay away from it until you start doing your cross countries. Just my 2 cents worth, Chris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |