A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The tax man cometh



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 6th 06, 02:15 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The tax man cometh

I have read some postings of California trying to tax Nevada aircraft but
this one is really far out!

I received one each for my two sailplanes, an Aircraft Statement form for me
to complete for the
the Assessor of Santa Barbara County,CA so that my aircraft can be
equitably valued!
And if I fail to file these forms, it requires the Assessor to add a 10%
penalty to the value of my aircraft.
The interesting thing is, these two aircraft have been based in Ohio for ten
and 20 years, respectively.
These people must be smoking something while they go through the entire FAA
aircraft list.
The letters were sent to Ohio so they had to see my address when they sent
them.

What in the world are these people thinking?

Gale Winnett
  #2  
Old March 6th 06, 03:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The tax man cometh

Did you at any time in the last year have your aircraft in California?
Do you own property in Santa Barbara County CA?

there was a thread last year about someone receiving a tax letter from Kern
County just because someone else may have mentioned that he was moving there
(or something like that), even though the gliders have always been based
elsewhere and he had to prove that they were indeed not in Kern Co and that
he had paid the tax in a different CA County

When counties get desperate for Tax dollars, you have to prove to them that
you don't owe the tax.
BT

wrote in message
...
I have read some postings of California trying to tax Nevada aircraft but
this one is really far out!

I received one each for my two sailplanes, an Aircraft Statement form for
me
to complete for the
the Assessor of Santa Barbara County,CA so that my aircraft can be
equitably valued!
And if I fail to file these forms, it requires the Assessor to add a 10%
penalty to the value of my aircraft.
The interesting thing is, these two aircraft have been based in Ohio for
ten
and 20 years, respectively.
These people must be smoking something while they go through the entire
FAA
aircraft list.
The letters were sent to Ohio so they had to see my address when they
sent
them.

What in the world are these people thinking?

Gale Winnett



  #3  
Old March 6th 06, 03:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The tax man cometh

California (bless their little cash strapped hearts) re-evaluates aircraft
each year, bumping the value according to Bluebook, then adding what sales
tax would be if you had to replace it to arrive at the taxable value.

Nevada, on the other hand, depreciates aircaft each year based on the number
of years you've owned it. When the tax amount due falls below $75, they tell
you there's no tax due.

Tax on my Mooney in Napa County CA was $1400. Moving it to Douglas County,
Nevada dropped the tax to $200. Makes me almost smile when I write the
check.

Oh, and the soaring conditions are substantially better at Minden!!

bumper


  #4  
Old March 6th 06, 04:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The tax man cometh

It is nice to live in Idaho where you only pay $0.01 per pound. ($8.10 for
my HP-14.)


"bumper" wrote in message
...
California (bless their little cash strapped hearts) re-evaluates aircraft
each year, bumping the value according to Bluebook, then adding what sales
tax would be if you had to replace it to arrive at the taxable value.

Nevada, on the other hand, depreciates aircaft each year based on the

number
of years you've owned it. When the tax amount due falls below $75, they

tell
you there's no tax due.

Tax on my Mooney in Napa County CA was $1400. Moving it to Douglas County,
Nevada dropped the tax to $200. Makes me almost smile when I write the
check.

Oh, and the soaring conditions are substantially better at Minden!!

bumper




  #5  
Old March 6th 06, 04:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The tax man cometh


In Tennessee we pay only sales tax on the original purchase, even of used
aircraft, at just over 6.5 percent. That's it. No annual cost at all.


Mark


"Wayne Paul" wrote in message
...
It is nice to live in Idaho where you only pay $0.01 per pound. ($8.10
for
my HP-14.)


"bumper" wrote in message
...
California (bless their little cash strapped hearts) re-evaluates
aircraft
each year, bumping the value according to Bluebook, then adding what
sales
tax would be if you had to replace it to arrive at the taxable value.

Nevada, on the other hand, depreciates aircaft each year based on the

number
of years you've owned it. When the tax amount due falls below $75, they

tell
you there's no tax due.

Tax on my Mooney in Napa County CA was $1400. Moving it to Douglas
County,
Nevada dropped the tax to $200. Makes me almost smile when I write the
check.

Oh, and the soaring conditions are substantially better at Minden!!

bumper






  #6  
Old March 7th 06, 04:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The tax man cometh

Arizona taxes airplanes on value but gliders (and antique airplanes)
are taxed $25 per year regardless of value. The taxman also takes a
cut on initial purchase of new gliders and trailers.

Andy

  #7  
Old March 9th 06, 03:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The tax man cometh

That was me. The Douglas County Assessor casually asked if I'd be
keeping my glider at Minden for the next season, and I casually answered
that I was considering moving it to Cal City. She then called up Kern
County and reported the move as a fact, causing Kern County to generate
a bill. It was an incredible ordeal to prove to Kern County that I was
still paying taxes to Douglas County, and therefore did not owe Kern
County anything.

The thing that frosted my shorts was that Kern County was downright
testy about my suggestion they PROVE that I owed them money, instead of
me having to prove that I didn't. They could easily send a bill to
every aircraft owner in California, and if they can't prove they're
paying taxes SOMEWHERE, then they owe Kern County.

Ken

In article ULMOf.1062$ld2.284@fed1read11,
"BTIZ" wrote:

Did you at any time in the last year have your aircraft in California?
Do you own property in Santa Barbara County CA?

there was a thread last year about someone receiving a tax letter from Kern
County just because someone else may have mentioned that he was moving there
(or something like that), even though the gliders have always been based
elsewhere and he had to prove that they were indeed not in Kern Co and that
he had paid the tax in a different CA County

When counties get desperate for Tax dollars, you have to prove to them that
you don't owe the tax.
BT

wrote in message
...
I have read some postings of California trying to tax Nevada aircraft but
this one is really far out!

I received one each for my two sailplanes, an Aircraft Statement form for
me
to complete for the
the Assessor of Santa Barbara County,CA so that my aircraft can be
equitably valued!
And if I fail to file these forms, it requires the Assessor to add a 10%
penalty to the value of my aircraft.
The interesting thing is, these two aircraft have been based in Ohio for
ten
and 20 years, respectively.
These people must be smoking something while they go through the entire
FAA
aircraft list.
The letters were sent to Ohio so they had to see my address when they
sent
them.

What in the world are these people thinking?

Gale Winnett

  #8  
Old March 6th 06, 05:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The tax man cometh

These people must be smoking something while they go through the entire
FAA
aircraft list.


Would that they were. I just got mine from Kern County where I pay my
sailplane property tax. I suspect that they're looking for ways to increase
their assessment income on aircraft already on the books.

Ray Warshaw
1LK




  #9  
Old March 6th 06, 05:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The tax man cometh

Don't sweat it. On that same tax form it should ask
where you base your aircraft. The taxes will be paid
to where you base your aircraft unless you volunteer
to pay taxes where you reside. I live in California.
I base my aircraft in Minden, NV. I get a tax form
from the county in which I reside about every two years.
I just tell them I base the plane in Nevada and it
is over. However, be warned that the California assessor
will check to make sure you ARE paying taxes to Nevada.
Essentially, as long as you ARE paying taxes you are
off the hook. However, if you tell California that
you are paying taxes (say, in Nevada) and you are not,
and they find out, you will be a very sorry aircraft
owner.
Now, having said that, I had one very ugly experience
with California. I had brought my plane to California
for some home repair and was keeping it on a local
airfield in Sacramento County. Turns out the county
has people regularly visit airports and record the
tail numbers of every plane on the field. Then they
send tax notices to every plane on the field that they
are not receiving taxes from. For this situation,
I had to prove that I keep my plane outside of the
state more than 50% of the year. I submitted ramp
fee receipts from Nevada and they actually called the
Nevada airport manager to verify that I do keep my
plane in Nevada most of the year. That situation took
several months to resolve.
The lesson is that tax authorities are starting to
talk to each other. If you lie, you could get a spanking.
At 04:24 06 March 2006, Raphael Warshaw wrote:

'Mark Lenox' wrote in message
...

In Tennessee we pay only sales tax on the original
purchase, even of used
aircraft, at just over 6.5 percent. That's it.
No annual cost at all.



That's nice, but, much as I hate to admit it, being
based at Cal City is
worth what I pay them.

Ray Warshaw
1LK






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.