![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A couple of months ago, here and elsewhere, there was a discussion
about the nature of the requirement to contact ATC before entering Class C airspace. The specific issues over which there was disagreement were (i) whether contact with any ATC facility was sufficient, or whether contact with the specific TRACON responsible for the airspace in question was required; and (ii) whether a pilot receiving VFR advisories from an ARTCC would be in violation of the FARs if he continued into Class C airspace without having first been handed off to the TRACON controlling that airspace. To obtain guidance on these matters, I wrote a letter to the FAA Chief Counsel seeking an opinion. I today received a reply, and I shall post a link to this and to the original enquiry in PDF format once I have scanned the document into a suitable format. The essence of the reply is that (i) it is necessary to be in contact with the specific TRACON responsible for the Class C rather than just any old ATC facility; and (ii) that the receipt of VFR advisories does not absolve a pilot of his responsibility to contact that TRACON before entering the airspace and that he would therefore be in violation if he entered without so doing. As I say, links to PDFs to follow. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting query. At first I wondered how this situation ever arises,
then I remembered my VFR flight into Troutdale (TTD) which is in a class D airspace that partially underlies and actually seems to invade the overlying Class C of Portland (PDX). I was on flight following from the southwest and couldn't find the TTD airport, so PDX approach was kindly giving me help... "it's about 2 miles at 12 o'clock." (Don't laugh; they're not always easy to find.) When he told me to contact TTD tower, I got a rather exasperated reply on my callin that I should have called them earlier. I meekly replied that I was with PDX approach until then, and he said "Oh well, that was ok." So, I guess I technically busted the Class D by not contacting them while I was still talking to approach (within Class C) but was already within 5 miles of the Class D airport. Frankly, since I was on radar with approach control I felt it was safer for everyone to stay with them until told to contact the local tower at TTD. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, the approach controller was responsible for either coordinating
your transition through the class D or handing you off. In truth, I believe there are areas of the class D that approach has agreements to send arrivals. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The confusion may come from that fact that if you are receiving flight following (or IFR) from center or some other facility and you fly through the class C you are ok, it is there responsibility to coordinate with the class C controllers for you or to hand you off. IFR, yes, but flight following, no. That's the whole point of the FAA's reply. If you're getting flight following, it's still your responsbility to know where you are and to make sure you're talking to the TRACON before you enter the Class C. If Center doesn't hand you off, that doesn't absolve you. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com... The confusion may come from that fact that if you are receiving flight following (or IFR) from center or some other facility and you fly through the class C you are ok, it is there responsibility to coordinate with the class C controllers for you or to hand you off. But its being their responsibility doesn't mean that it isn't still the pilot's responsibility too (in the case of VFR flight following). In fact, the AIM (3-2-1d) says "It is the responsibility of the pilot to insure that ATC clearance or radio communication requirements are met prior to entry into Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace. *The pilot retains this responsibility when receiving ATC radar advisories*." (emphasis added). So even when I'm receiving flight following, I assume I need to talk to the tower or approach controller of the facility whose airspace I'm about to transit, except if the chart notes otherwise (for example, in the case of several satellites whose Class D airspace is underneath Boston's Class B, the chart says to contact Boston Approach to transit the Class D above a certain altitude). In practice, though, I can't recall any time that the controller giving me radar advisories wasn't already the one I needed to be in contact with. --Gary |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"it's about 2 miles at 12 o'clock."
(Don't laugh; they're not always easy to find.) When he told me to contact TTD tower, I got a rather exasperated reply on my callin that I should have called them earlier. I meekly replied that I was with PDX approach until then, and he said "Oh well, that was ok." The tower at Janesville, WI (JVL) actually made Mary turn around and leave the airspace, fly three miles out, and call in AGAIN after Rockford Approach (RFD) dumped her into their Class D airspace. JVL and RFD certainly weren't on the same team that day. We now dump Rockford Approach when we're ten miles out from Janesville. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
The tower at Janesville, WI (JVL) actually made Mary turn around and leave the airspace, fly three miles out, and call in AGAIN after Rockford Approach (RFD) dumped her into their Class D airspace. JVL and RFD certainly weren't on the same team that day. We now dump Rockford Approach when we're ten miles out from Janesville. I have read of pilots experiencing this at Caldwell, New Jersey, a class D airport here in the busy northeast US. IMO, a crazy and potentially dangerous way (added frequency congestion, distracted controller, 180 degree turn in busy airspace) to demonstrate a point. -- Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL...
You're name isn't "Kris" is it? You don't fly on online on VATSIM do you? One of the people I know who flies online couldn't find TTD! In all seriousness, I fly out of Salem (SLE) and have flown in the Class C airspace quite a bit. Seattle Center typically will hand you off or dump you when heading north towards the PDX Charlie airspace. Your only option is to contact PDX Approach. Yes, PDX Approach is VERY friendly. I even toured the approach and tower facilities at PDX. It's quite interesting. Too bad they have the age limits on controlling, since I could probably change careers for it. ![]() I was on my long cross country as a student pilot and began heading the wrong direction from TTD. I intended to head towards Mulino (4S9), but instead was heading about 30-40 degrees east of the heading and was moving towards Mt Hood (still a ways off). I saw it after a short bit and as I was making my correction, PDX Approach contacted me to let me know I was heading the wrong direction, too. Btw, the Class D does not "invade" the Class C. It just butts up against the Class C. You are not "busting" any Class D while in the Class C because you are in contact with the TRACON (e.g. PDX Approach) and they coordinate handing you off to other facilities while in the Class C, such as TTD Tower. PDX, TTD, and HIO all are part of the STARS system at PDX, so all 3 airports have a radar display. Salem, by the way, does not have any radar display in its tower cab. They are strictly a visual tower. Apparently, the ZSE radar facility due west of Salem does not cover Salem that well and Salem is too far south for the PDX (RTX) radar to cover. Have a great day! Chris skym wrote: Interesting query. At first I wondered how this situation ever arises, then I remembered my VFR flight into Troutdale (TTD) which is in a class D airspace that partially underlies and actually seems to invade the overlying Class C of Portland (PDX). I was on flight following from the southwest and couldn't find the TTD airport, so PDX approach was kindly giving me help... "it's about 2 miles at 12 o'clock." (Don't laugh; they're not always easy to find.) When he told me to contact TTD tower, I got a rather exasperated reply on my callin that I should have called them earlier. I meekly replied that I was with PDX approach until then, and he said "Oh well, that was ok." So, I guess I technically busted the Class D by not contacting them while I was still talking to approach (within Class C) but was already within 5 miles of the Class D airport. Frankly, since I was on radar with approach control I felt it was safer for everyone to stay with them until told to contact the local tower at TTD. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Apr 2006 18:29:51 -0700, "Mike Granby" wrote
in .com:: The essence of the reply is that (i) it is necessary to be in contact with the specific TRACON responsible for the Class C rather than just any old ATC facility; http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text....1.3.10.2.4.17 § 91.130 Operations in Class C airspace (c) Communications. Each person operating an aircraft in Class C airspace must meet the following two-way radio communications requirements: (1) Arrival or through flight. Each person must establish two-way radio communications with the ATC facility (including foreign ATC in the case of foreign airspace designated in the United States) providing air traffic services prior to entering that airspace and thereafter maintain those communications while within that airspace. From the words of the regulation above it is clear that the words 'the ACT facility' refer to the ATC facility with responsibility for flight within their Class C airspace. But it could have been worded so that there was less ambiguity. and (ii) that the receipt of VFR advisories does not absolve a pilot of his responsibility to contact that TRACON before entering the airspace and that he would therefore be in violation if he entered without so doing. It is difficult to anticipate a situation in which Radar Traffic Advisory Service within a Class C airspace is being provided by a facility other than the one which has responsibility for that Class C airspace. As I say, links to PDFs to follow. Thanks for your effort in seeking official clarification of this issue, sharing it here, and making the original documents available on-line. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |