![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is my understanding that even if a GPS is reading perfectly and your
standard altimeter is reading perfectly even on a standard day that the 2 values will not be the same. Does anyone know about how far off they are and if there is a way to calculate what the difference should be? My guess is that at different points around the earth, the correction will be significantly different, making a generic formula difficult if not impossible to write. -- Chris W KE5GIX Gift Giving Made Easy Get the gifts you want & give the gifts they want One stop wish list for any gift, from anywhere, for any occasion! http://thewishzone.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you have an perfectly calibrated barometric altimeter and
have a perfect altimeter setting taken just a few seconds before, there are mechanical errors. Altimeter settings on the ground will vary in just a few miles. The lapse rate is not constant. But the GPS errors are very small and are calculated and corrected in real time. But aircraft separation is based on barometrics, so GPS is not used to establish cruise altitudes. GPS could be used for instrument approaches since the ground and obstructions are fixed and generally known quantities. GPS is used for photography and surveying. GPS and terrain mapping will keep you safe from the ground and the barometric altimeter is still needed to keep the cruise altitudes set. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Chris W" wrote in message news:q2x0g.917$9c6.179@dukeread11... | It is my understanding that even if a GPS is reading perfectly and your | standard altimeter is reading perfectly even on a standard day that the | 2 values will not be the same. Does anyone know about how far off they | are and if there is a way to calculate what the difference should be? | My guess is that at different points around the earth, the correction | will be significantly different, making a generic formula difficult if | not impossible to write. | | -- | Chris W | KE5GIX | | Gift Giving Made Easy | Get the gifts you want & | give the gifts they want | One stop wish list for any gift, | from anywhere, for any occasion! | http://thewishzone.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The altimeter is a barometer and the GPS is a computerized stopwatch.
Considering that they measure such different things, amazing that there's any realationship at all, huh? The mathematical model of the earth the the GPS software uses is idealized somewhat and provides only an approximation of the bulging of the surface of the earth relative to its geometric center point (points, actually!). So, at any particular location you're over, your actual distance from the ground can be different from what the GPS's software thinks it is. So point A is that the GPS altitude can be inaccurate. Point B is that your altimeter is only as accurate as the setting you have in the Kollsman window. If it's based on old data or data for a distant location or if rapid weather change is occurring, it won't exactly reflect the pressure corrected for MSL for the location you're above. If your GPS has WAAS enabled, you're in an area where the model of the earth closely matches reality and you have a current altimeter setting for the exact area, they should come very close to matching. If any of the above isn't true, you'll see some degree of difference between them. Chris W wrote: It is my understanding that even if a GPS is reading perfectly and your standard altimeter is reading perfectly even on a standard day that the 2 values will not be the same. Does anyone know about how far off they are and if there is a way to calculate what the difference should be? My guess is that at different points around the earth, the correction will be significantly different, making a generic formula difficult if not impossible to write. -- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Grumman 236 wrote:
The altimeter is a barometer and the GPS is a computerized stopwatch. Considering that they measure such different things, amazing that there's any realationship at all, huh? The mathematical model of the earth the the GPS software uses is idealized somewhat and provides only an approximation of the bulging of the surface of the earth relative to its geometric center point (points, actually!). So, at any particular location you're over, your actual distance from the ground can be different from what the GPS's software thinks it is. So point A is that the GPS altitude can be inaccurate. But note that most consumer GPS receivers do not report altitudes based only on the idealized mathematical model of the earth's shape (generally the WGS-84 ellipsoid). They also include correction tables that reflect the difference between the geoid shape and the ellipsoid as a function of your position over the earth's surface. So the reported altitude is with respect to sealevel, not relative to the idealized ellipsoid. Naturally there will still be measurement uncertainties and the correction table is also limited in precision, but in terms of aircraft altitudes the errors are pretty small. Point B is that your altimeter is only as accurate as the setting you have in the Kollsman window. If it's based on old data or data for a distant location or if rapid weather change is occurring, it won't exactly reflect the pressure corrected for MSL for the location you're above. True, but then there's also Point C. Even if you've entered the correct current value into the Kollsman window for your location, it still just reflects the sealevel-adjusted pressure at ground level below you and your altimeter then uses an idealized standard atmosphere model to determine your altitude. If the temperature and lapse rate of the actual atmosphere doesn't match the model then the reported altitude can be significantly different from reality; hundreds or even a thousand feet or more of variation. But, as mentioned, aircraft vertical separations are based on barometric altitudes and as long as everyone in a given area is off by the same amount the separations will still be maintained. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 Apr 2006 13:52:58 -0700, "peter" wrote:
Grumman 236 wrote: The altimeter is a barometer and the GPS is a computerized stopwatch. Considering that they measure such different things, amazing that there's any realationship at all, huh? The mathematical model of the earth the the GPS software uses is idealized somewhat and provides only an approximation of the bulging of the surface of the earth relative to its geometric center point (points, actually!). So, at any particular location you're over, your actual distance from the ground can be different from what the GPS's software thinks it is. So point A is that the GPS altitude can be inaccurate. But note that most consumer GPS receivers do not report altitudes based only on the idealized mathematical model of the earth's shape (generally the WGS-84 ellipsoid). They also include correction tables that reflect the difference between the geoid shape and the ellipsoid as a function of your position over the earth's surface. So the reported altitude is with respect to sealevel, not relative to the idealized ellipsoid. Naturally there will still be measurement uncertainties and the correction table is also limited in precision, but in terms of aircraft altitudes the errors are pretty small. Point B is that your altimeter is only as accurate as the setting you have in the Kollsman window. If it's based on old data or data for a distant location or if rapid weather change is occurring, it won't exactly reflect the pressure corrected for MSL for the location you're above. True, but then there's also Point C. Even if you've entered the correct current value into the Kollsman window for your location, it still just reflects the sealevel-adjusted pressure at ground level below you and your altimeter then uses an idealized standard atmosphere model to determine your altitude. If the temperature and lapse rate of the actual atmosphere doesn't match the model then the reported altitude can be significantly different from reality; hundreds or even a thousand feet or more of variation. But, as mentioned, aircraft vertical separations are based on barometric altitudes and as long as everyone in a given area is off by the same amount the separations will still be maintained. Have a look at the following url: http://sps.unavco.org/geoid/ David |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AIM 1-1-19a(8) tells you to not to rely upon GPS altitude. Until the AIM is
changed, I'm not concerned with the details. Bob Gardner "Chris W" wrote in message news:q2x0g.917$9c6.179@dukeread11... It is my understanding that even if a GPS is reading perfectly and your standard altimeter is reading perfectly even on a standard day that the 2 values will not be the same. Does anyone know about how far off they are and if there is a way to calculate what the difference should be? My guess is that at different points around the earth, the correction will be significantly different, making a generic formula difficult if not impossible to write. -- Chris W KE5GIX Gift Giving Made Easy Get the gifts you want & give the gifts they want One stop wish list for any gift, from anywhere, for any occasion! http://thewishzone.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OOps. AIM 1-1-19 (a) (4). Doggone feds changed the numbers on me!
Bob Gardner "Chris W" wrote in message news:q2x0g.917$9c6.179@dukeread11... It is my understanding that even if a GPS is reading perfectly and your standard altimeter is reading perfectly even on a standard day that the 2 values will not be the same. Does anyone know about how far off they are and if there is a way to calculate what the difference should be? My guess is that at different points around the earth, the correction will be significantly different, making a generic formula difficult if not impossible to write. -- Chris W KE5GIX Gift Giving Made Easy Get the gifts you want & give the gifts they want One stop wish list for any gift, from anywhere, for any occasion! http://thewishzone.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To respond to the original posters question. I have often asked the
same thing. My observations are this. My plane is sitting in the hangar at 6412.37 msl. The airport was just recently surveyed so I am sure this is a real close number. I set my altimeter to the current setting and it shows within 3 feet. I fire up my King KMD150 MFD and it will almost always show 8- 12 feet higher then that, never seen it lower. It must be that mathmatical modeling thing. Then I fire up my Garmin 196 and it varies between 15 feet higher and 10 feet lower. I attribute that to a less sensitive circuitry in the handheld unit altho I might be wrong surmising that. I would be curious to see what others see in their respective areas.? Ben www.haaspowerair.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The barometric altimeter is calibrated to zero at the wheel
contact point with the ground. The GPS measures at the antenna. Like all things made by man, there are tolerances. Reason the baro-altimeter is wheel height, think of a 747, do you want the cockpit or the wheels to clear the trees at the end of the runway? -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P wrote in message oups.com... | To respond to the original posters question. I have often asked the | same thing. My observations are this. My plane is sitting in the hangar | at 6412.37 msl. The airport was just recently surveyed so I am sure | this is a real close number. I set my altimeter to the current setting | and it shows within 3 feet. I fire up my King KMD150 MFD and it will | almost always show 8- 12 feet higher then that, never seen it lower. It | must be that mathmatical modeling thing. Then I fire up my Garmin 196 | and it varies between 15 feet higher and 10 feet lower. I attribute | that to a less sensitive circuitry in the handheld unit altho I might | be wrong surmising that. I would be curious to see what others see in | their respective areas.? | | Ben | www.haaspowerair.com | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 09:14 PM |
What's minimum safe O2 level? | PaulH | Piloting | 29 | November 9th 04 07:35 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Piloting | 38 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |