![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had made passing mention recently about spotting a U2 aircraft
cruising around southern California. Well, this past week I managed to get some good photographs of it and have put up a webpage about it. Turned out to be a NASA ER-2. http://www.skywise711.com/misc/ER2/ER2.html Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Skywise" wrote in message ... I had made passing mention recently about spotting a U2 aircraft cruising around southern California. Well, this past week I managed to get some good photographs of it and have put up a webpage about it. Turned out to be a NASA ER-2. http://www.skywise711.com/misc/ER2/ER2.html Brian -- Nice shots! I wonder how the shots they took of you turned out? ;-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well done, Brian!
That's quite a trick you performed, several times. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
".Blueskies." wrote in news:A6B0g.16388
: "Skywise" wrote in message ... I had made passing mention recently about spotting a U2 aircraft cruising around southern California. Well, this past week I managed to get some good photographs of it and have put up a webpage about it. Turned out to be a NASA ER-2. http://www.skywise711.com/misc/ER2/ER2.html Brian -- Nice shots! I wonder how the shots they took of you turned out? ;-) Yeah, me too!! I do wonder what it's mission was....studying the LA smog? Updating Google Earth? Looking for people looking at airplanes with their telescope? ehhehehe ![]() says, "hi mom!" ![]() Next, I'm going to callibrate the optical system so I can determine a range, and therefore an approximate altitude. I have a hunch it wasn't flying very high, as at zenith I could still make out it's shape clearly naked eye. But then, I might be considered a trained, well, experienced observer. I'm used to staring into telescopes straining to pick out the faint fuzzy thing at the verge of seeing. Hmmm...I just had a funny idea. Since I have a website, I could make up a really complicated email address that isn't likely to be guessed, and then put a sign on the roof saying, "If you can read this, email ". Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skywise wrote...
I had made passing mention recently about spotting a U2 aircraft cruising around southern California. Well, this past week I managed to get some good photographs of it and have put up a webpage about it. Turned out to be a NASA ER-2. http://www.skywise711.com/misc/ER2/ER2.html Brian Hey Brian, has it been relatively consistent in the time of day it appears? I live in Westminster and go to school in Pomona and would love to catch a glimpse of it (as would the other aerospac guys at school, I'm sure). And to restate what everyone else has said - those are great shots! Thanks for sharing them! -Tony |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
interesting to know which plane the last 3 pictures are of?
definitely not the same as the first that could be the U-2 much different wing profile BT "Skywise" wrote in message ... I had made passing mention recently about spotting a U2 aircraft cruising around southern California. Well, this past week I managed to get some good photographs of it and have put up a webpage about it. Turned out to be a NASA ER-2. http://www.skywise711.com/misc/ER2/ER2.html Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skywise wrote in news:1245rres2r38292
@corp.supernews.com: Snipola Next, I'm going to callibrate the optical system so I can determine a range, and therefore an approximate altitude. I have a hunch it wasn't flying very high, as at zenith I could still make out it's shape clearly naked eye. Snipola OK, just computed a range. She was indeed at 70,000 feet or thereabouts. I'm really surprised that when she flew by that I could make it out naked eye at that altitude. No, I'm not worth $6 million. ![]() Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BTIZ" wrote in message news:j%C0g.7170$Qz.1048@fed1read11... interesting to know which plane the last 3 pictures are of? definitely not the same as the first that could be the U-2 much different wing profile BT The later pictures are of a B-57, and I'm pretty sure it is a B-57F. The B-57D looks similar, but I *think* all of them have been retired. These aircraft are B-57's in nomenclature only. They share a similar planform with non-recon B-57's, but the airframe, engines, and wings are far different than the rest of the B-57 family. I sat in on a forum at Oshkosh once upon a time where a B-57F driver told some of his tales. The short version was that he saw some interesting sights from as high as 82,000'.. The airplane can be configured two ways. Typically the airplane has two engines. It is flown in that configuration to maximize range and endurance. In addition, two pod mounted engines can be bolted on below the wings if the mission's focus requires absolute maximum altitude. NASA and the CIA fly (or flew) these aircraft. KB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Skywise" wrote in message
... Hmmm...I just had a funny idea. Since I have a website, I could make up a really complicated email address that isn't likely to be guessed, and then put a sign on the roof saying, "If you can read this, email ". And then everyone who flies over your house might email you? Or maybe something like, "For a good time, email "? grin |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kyle Boatright" wrote in
: "BTIZ" wrote in message news:j%C0g.7170$Qz.1048@fed1read11... interesting to know which plane the last 3 pictures are of? definitely not the same as the first that could be the U-2 much different wing profile BT The later pictures are of a B-57, and I'm pretty sure it is a B-57F. The B-57D looks similar, but I *think* all of them have been retired. All of the images on my page are of the same aircraft taken the same day. Some of them were taken with the plane at a distance so the perspective is much different than looking straight up at its belly. Take a look at this NASA webpage, which has a picture of an ER-2. It matches what I observed. http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/r...R-2/index.html The Canberra's wings are much more triangular. Plus, my photogrammatic analysis puts the plane at around 70,000 feet. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA model uses thermals | Burt Compton - Marfa | Soaring | 10 | October 8th 05 03:24 PM |
What has NASA done for you? | BobGoFish | Piloting | 34 | August 9th 05 08:14 PM |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
NASA chokes again | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | May 2nd 05 01:43 AM |
NASA Research looking for pilots with WSI in-flight weather experience | Peter R. | Piloting | 3 | October 20th 04 02:23 AM |