![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've always been a ziplock man myself but the recent thread got me
considering catheters. My ship has a fitting for connecting a catheter. The fitting is connected to a tube that ends at the trailing edge of one of the gear doors. The fitting has a rubber O-ring and looks like another fitting on the tube leading from the condom-like part of the catheter should just snap onto it. I went Googling male external catheters and found pic of most of the parts (condom thing, leg bag, valve btwn condom & leg bag), but no descriptions or images of the connectors. Given my ships layout, there's no place to put the leg bag that wouldn't be uphill. Any words of wisdom from catheter users? Are they all made w/quick connects to the bags? Should I just buy a box of the condoms and the bag and use the tubing to re-plumb the ship? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probably have the receptacle from Tim Mara.
http://www.wingsandwheels.com/page42.htm Bottom of page.. Those are the ones I use. The "male" end, as you suspected just snaps in to the receptacle you have. The tip of the catheter is just the right size to be a stretch fit over the barbed end of the male fitting. They are made by Colder Products. http://www.colder.com/asp_main/MedicalProducts.asp PLC Series about halfway down the page. Mcmaster-Carr also carries them under the heading "Quick Disconnect Tube Couplings" But go ahead and get just get them from Tim. Let's support our soaring supplies dealers! Larry -- zero one - "303SAM" wrote in message : I've always been a ziplock man myself but the recent thread got me considering catheters. My ship has a fitting for connecting a catheter. The fitting is connected to a tube that ends at the trailing edge of one of the gear doors. The fitting has a rubber O-ring and looks like another fitting on the tube leading from the condom-like part of the catheter should just snap onto it. I went Googling male external catheters and found pic of most of the parts (condom thing, leg bag, valve btwn condom & leg bag), but no descriptions or images of the connectors. Given my ships layout, there's no place to put the leg bag that wouldn't be uphill. Any words of wisdom from catheter users? Are they all made w/quick connects to the bags? Should I just buy a box of the condoms and the bag and use the tubing to re-plumb the ship? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One thing to watch out for is where the urine goes once it is outside
the aircraft as it is very corrosive to metal parts. During my annual yesterday we found some unusual corrosion on the aileron bellcrank mount. All other controls are in great shape. There is a drain hole in the fusilage just aft of the gear doors and the drain tube termination. I am speculating that some of the urine 'mist' may be getting inside the fusilage and causing the corrosion. The mount is directly aft of this drain hole and of course inside the fusilage. I have also heard from other pilots of corrosion in the wheel and brake areas due to this problem. Of course you can prevent or remedy this problem. I am going to plug the drain hole and the wheel problem could be remedied with regular cleaning. The point is that you need to beware of where on your aircraft the urinne may be depositied and take care of it. I really think a catheter is the way to go because you need to nothing else but think about it and it is done! But I am now thinking I may have the tube go into a baggie filled with an absorbant material instead of releasing the urine under the glider. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A few comments;
1) The combination of a catheter and urine bag is the way to go (no pun intended) in my book. When you need to go, there is no thinking about it or fiddling with anything. Well...maybe some thinking 2) The bag has a one way valve at the inlet side and a twist lock drain at the outlet end. It guarantees whatever has flowed into the bag, will remain in the bag. 3) I often have the urine bag uphill from the "point of effluence". Every cathether based system has this "issue" to a certain extent. But, because the whole thing is sealed, this has never been an issue with me. With a bag, after landing I can stand up and drain the whole shooting match end-to-end. If you are embarassed by an exposed bag, I have in the past strapped the bag to my calf with the elastic straps that are provided with every bag. 4) Between the bag and the catheter I use surgical hose. There is a barbed connector that comes with the bag. The catheter is basically also a hose fitting. Therefore you need a male-to-male barbed connector (jeez, that sounds nasty) to make the final connection. 5) I never went with the external relief tubing as my glider is standard certified and I was worried about any modification. 6) My first effort to get myself equipped was at a medical supply store. After spending some time explaining why a pilot would need something that is generally relegated to geriatric wards, the clerk was able to help me with all my initial needs, connectors, bags, etc. 7) Stick with Mentor brand Clear Advantage with Aloe. Get ahold of some Detachol if you are worried about the seperation of you from the catheter. Give it a try, you can always go back to your current method. Good luck. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Far too complicated.
I use bio-degradable plastic bags. Pee into and pop out of the window. "ContestID67" wrote in message ups.com... A few comments; 1) The combination of a catheter and urine bag is the way to go (no pun intended) in my book. When you need to go, there is no thinking about it or fiddling with anything. Well...maybe some thinking 2) The bag has a one way valve at the inlet side and a twist lock drain at the outlet end. It guarantees whatever has flowed into the bag, will remain in the bag. 3) I often have the urine bag uphill from the "point of effluence". Every cathether based system has this "issue" to a certain extent. But, because the whole thing is sealed, this has never been an issue with me. With a bag, after landing I can stand up and drain the whole shooting match end-to-end. If you are embarassed by an exposed bag, I have in the past strapped the bag to my calf with the elastic straps that are provided with every bag. 4) Between the bag and the catheter I use surgical hose. There is a barbed connector that comes with the bag. The catheter is basically also a hose fitting. Therefore you need a male-to-male barbed connector (jeez, that sounds nasty) to make the final connection. 5) I never went with the external relief tubing as my glider is standard certified and I was worried about any modification. 6) My first effort to get myself equipped was at a medical supply store. After spending some time explaining why a pilot would need something that is generally relegated to geriatric wards, the clerk was able to help me with all my initial needs, connectors, bags, etc. 7) Stick with Mentor brand Clear Advantage with Aloe. Get ahold of some Detachol if you are worried about the seperation of you from the catheter. Give it a try, you can always go back to your current method. Good luck. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll second that regarding corrosion. Cost me a gear rebuild and later,
after repositioning the exit to the bottom of the gear door, I believe that some was being drawn into the rudder hinge area (LS-6) but can't confirm that. The catheter and bag works. The seal on self-sealing cathers works fine and keeps it a closed system. No flow back even if the bag is on the same level. I found the area under my calf worked great for the bag. My calf never touched it. I was always a bit to big in the small cockpits to figure out how a ziplock is used but it clearly works fine for many pilots in many ships (until they **#$%^ spill one). I suggest keeping the bag until landing. My first experiments with tossing bags failed in multiple ways. 'Nuff said there. 1980s experience from Foureyes. Go wrote: One thing to watch out for is where the urine goes once it is outside the aircraft as it is very corrosive to metal parts. During my annual yesterday we found some unusual corrosion on the aileron bellcrank mount. All other controls are in great shape. There is a drain hole in the fusilage just aft of the gear doors and the drain tube termination. I am speculating that some of the urine 'mist' may be getting inside the fusilage and causing the corrosion. The mount is directly aft of this drain hole and of course inside the fusilage. I have also heard from other pilots of corrosion in the wheel and brake areas due to this problem. Of course you can prevent or remedy this problem. I am going to plug the drain hole and the wheel problem could be remedied with regular cleaning. The point is that you need to beware of where on your aircraft the urinne may be depositied and take care of it. I really think a catheter is the way to go because you need to nothing else but think about it and it is done! But I am now thinking I may have the tube go into a baggie filled with an absorbant material instead of releasing the urine under the glider. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maule Driver wrote:
I'll second that regarding corrosion. Cost me a gear rebuild and later, after repositioning the exit to the bottom of the gear door, I believe that some was being drawn into the rudder hinge area (LS-6) but can't confirm that. Careful thought needs to be made in terms of positioning the exit - it needs to be in a low pressure area and positioned so that it doesn't then risk contaminating corrodible parts. Our Nimbus 2c has the exit in centre of the lower starboard quadrant of the cockpit 'bulge', just aft of the widest point (i.e. low pressure area). The only potential metal in that flow is the tail wheel assembly. Not only have we not had any problems there, there is no trace of dried urine on the skin of the aircraft. Whilst I have used bags in other aircraft when cross country instructing, having a plumbed in system makes for much more comfortable flying. As for catheters, I (and no pilot I know of here in Aus) uses the adhesive tape that comes with the external catheters (known locally and rather politically incorrectly as 'Irish condoms'). They seal perfectly when rolled far enough down the penis. The only problems I have experienced in removing them have revolved around rolling pubic hair into them during the removal. I have decided that a judicious shave is the answer to that problem! -- Robert Hart +61 (0)438 385 533 http://www.hart.wattle.id.au |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You must be 1) more coordinated that I am and 2) larger that I am.
I simply cannot get my "equipment" exposed and aimed into a bag, while flying, and while lying prone. This may sound complicated but it really isn't. Flying safely is complicated. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regarding 'low pressure' area. My six had been rather crudely modified
by the previous owner with a waste tube that exited in front of the gear door area. Whether or not that particular spot was low pressure or not didn't seem to matter. My personal plumbing in those years had positive pressure at the source. The problem was that the gear well, despite sealing, was a low pressure area and was sucking corrosive urine up into the entire gear mechanism. Obviously an exit anywhere in front of the gear well would be ill advised on that ship. After a rebuild, we mounted the tube on the bottom of a gear door so I could open the gear when needed and extend the discharge point 5 inches or so away from the fuse. Did the aerodynamics work for that? Probably. That was about as much engineering as I was willing to do to facilitate a pee. If 'ol Foureyes cycled his gear while above you in the gaggle, you weren't one of his favorites. Robert Hart wrote: Maule Driver wrote: I'll second that regarding corrosion. Cost me a gear rebuild and later, after repositioning the exit to the bottom of the gear door, I believe that some was being drawn into the rudder hinge area (LS-6) but can't confirm that. Careful thought needs to be made in terms of positioning the exit - it needs to be in a low pressure area and positioned so that it doesn't then risk contaminating corrodible parts. Our Nimbus 2c has the exit in centre of the lower starboard quadrant of the cockpit 'bulge', just aft of the widest point (i.e. low pressure area). The only potential metal in that flow is the tail wheel assembly. Not only have we not had any problems there, there is no trace of dried urine on the skin of the aircraft. Whilst I have used bags in other aircraft when cross country instructing, having a plumbed in system makes for much more comfortable flying. As for catheters, I (and no pilot I know of here in Aus) uses the adhesive tape that comes with the external catheters (known locally and rather politically incorrectly as 'Irish condoms'). They seal perfectly when rolled far enough down the penis. The only problems I have experienced in removing them have revolved around rolling pubic hair into them during the removal. I have decided that a judicious shave is the answer to that problem! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ContestID67 wrote:
You must be 1) more coordinated that I am and 2) larger that I am. I simply cannot get my "equipment" exposed and aimed into a bag, while flying, and while lying prone. Ah - perhaps I should have elaborated... I have used 'plumbed' pee bags. This means I wear an external catheter which is attached to the 'deflated' pee bag by a tube. It is essential to connect this up the right way as the valves on the pee bag are 'non return' and so if connected backwards you end up with a balooning catheter (quickly followed by a wet parachute)!!! -- Robert Hart +61 (0)438 385 533 http://www.hart.wattle.id.au |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lyc. O-360 cylinder question | JB | Owning | 13 | November 27th 04 09:32 PM |
Handheld battery question | RobsSanta | General Aviation | 8 | September 19th 04 03:07 PM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Partnership Question | Harry Gordon | Owning | 4 | August 16th 03 11:23 PM |