![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have recent experience getting a Garmin 300XL GPS/COM
installed? I'm trying to figure out the comparison in price between the 430 and the 300 when it comes to the total cost of the installation. This will initially be a VFR only installation, but I want the GPS to be IFR capable so that when I finish upgrading the rest of the panel, I don't have to get a new GPS. I see factory refurbished 300Xls selling for about $2700 which is significatly less than a 430 costs. Any recent experiences with installations on either the 430 or 300 would be appreciated. Thanks, Eric |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
430 is $ 300XL, that the case. 50% about?
The installation is much messier since you need a relay box to switch your indicator from your VOR to the 300XL GPS. So that could easily eat up part of the cost saving, both the sw box and the hours to wire it up. Very tedious. Check quotes carefully. FAA approval probably slightly easier on 430. Another equation: 300XL old generation, nasty operation (tho not real bad) 430 sweet operation-- very nice implementation. The sting on the bucks will be forgotten quickly. The difference will be you think. Oh.. the 430 will affect the value of your plane more positively. Bill Hale BPPP instructor 430 enthusiast. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the perspective on the 430. I know that the full IFR
installation on the 300 is a lot more complex, however I'm just looking at VFR capability right now. The plane (a 50s vintage warbird) has zero navigation equipment installed other than a Garmin 195 handheld (no VORs, no ADF, and old electric gyros with no vacuum system) I'm a long ways from an IFR capable panel, but I'd rather get a GPS that could eventually be used IFR vs one that would definitely have to be replaced at that point. It looks like there is about a $3K difference in fully installed prices (for VFR capability) between the 2 boxes, but I'm trying to confirm that. Thanks, Eric |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, the 300 is a good box for what you are doing now... you don't
have to connect it to an external indicator for VFR. And with the comm built in, the install is pretty easy. So it wouldn't be the worst thing you ever did... just leave enough panel height to upgrade to a 430. When you upgrade, you will get a good price for the 300... lots of guys doing what you are. I'm still guessing it's the best IFR answer. Bill |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You should probably just stay with your 195 or upgrade to the 396. There
really isn't any advantage to adding the 300 at this point. Unless you are willing to dump many thousands into upgrading your panel you already have a way to navigate and it isn't costing you anything. You mentioned about eventually going IFR. If that is true it would be more cost effective to sell the current plane and buy one that already had the IFR panel in it. My wild-ass-guess would be that it would cost you upwards of fifty grand to add all the necessary equipment to your current bird to make it IFR capable. Maybe not that much but it would be an expensive venture for sure. Reguardless on what you end up doing, good luck to you. Jon Kraus '79 Mooney 201 4443H @ TYQ wrote: Thanks for the perspective on the 430. I know that the full IFR installation on the 300 is a lot more complex, however I'm just looking at VFR capability right now. The plane (a 50s vintage warbird) has zero navigation equipment installed other than a Garmin 195 handheld (no VORs, no ADF, and old electric gyros with no vacuum system) I'm a long ways from an IFR capable panel, but I'd rather get a GPS that could eventually be used IFR vs one that would definitely have to be replaced at that point. It looks like there is about a $3K difference in fully installed prices (for VFR capability) between the 2 boxes, but I'm trying to confirm that. Thanks, Eric |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jon,
The total is probably closer to $25K to get to an IFR panel, but it is significant as you point out. There really aren't any of my aircraft available on the market with IFR panels, so its more of a decision of whether I want this plane to be IFR capable in the long term. After talking with the avionics shop today and looking at their demo 396, I may go the route you suggested anyway. Unfortunately now I want a transponder upgrade so I can get the TIS traffic on the 396. Thanks, Eric 1959 Pilatus P-3 A-848 http://www.hometown.aol.com/bartscher/P3A848.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yea after I sent the post I figured that 50 AMU's was probably pretty
high... As far as the 396 goes I think that is a good choice, Sorry I cost you more cash by wanting the TIS traffic upgrade... :-) Jon Kraus '79 Mooney 201 4443H @ TYQ wrote: Jon, The total is probably closer to $25K to get to an IFR panel, but it is significant as you point out. There really aren't any of my aircraft available on the market with IFR panels, so its more of a decision of whether I want this plane to be IFR capable in the long term. After talking with the avionics shop today and looking at their demo 396, I may go the route you suggested anyway. Unfortunately now I want a transponder upgrade so I can get the TIS traffic on the 396. Thanks, Eric 1959 Pilatus P-3 A-848 http://www.hometown.aol.com/bartscher/P3A848.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
, Are you familiar with the panel mounts at airgizmos.com? They might help make it look tidy. I have the 396 and agree it is an excellent choice as your one and only GPS if you can live without RNAV approaches. I've seen the airgizmo thing and if you can get it past the FAA I think it's a great concept. I'm not aware of any installations in GA aircraft, I think the avionics shops are still afraid of them. I don't know what kind of certification hoops you have to jump through for your warbird. BTW, has anyone seen one of the airgizmo mounts that's been blessed by a FSDO for other than homebuilt? Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Butler wrote: I've seen the airgizmo thing and if you can get it past the FAA I think it's a great concept. Just put it in. I'm not aware of any installations in GA aircraft, I think the avionics shops are still afraid of them. We have about 6 on the field here alone. they are turning up everywhere you look around here. BTW, has anyone seen one of the airgizmo mounts that's been blessed by a FSDO for other than homebuilt? It's not up to FSDO as no 337 is needed, it's a minor alteration. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Products | 10 | April 29th 04 06:57 AM |
Cost of Compass Card installed in a PA28-235 | Jack Cunniff | Owning | 1 | August 27th 03 06:14 AM |
Garmin 90 Database Updates Discontinued | Val Christian | Piloting | 14 | August 20th 03 09:32 PM |