![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
82UL was developed several years ago, to be easily produced from
automotive fuel. Instead of being produce by only one or two manufacturers as 100LL is, 82UL could be made by any oil company. This should make it cheaper to produce. 82UL is NOT a replacement for 100LL. It is my understanding that about 30% of the general aviation fleet requires 100LL to prevent detonation, but the other 70% can use 82UL. With the cost of fuel these days, if 82UL is significantly cheaper than 100LL, it's availability might save general aviation. With the new various laws requiring ethanol in automotive fuel, it seems it would be more important than ever that 82UL be produced for the aviation market. Yet after all these years 82UL has yet to show up anywhere. What does it take to get this fuel produced and available to aviators? Does it have to come from the demand side, by making pilots aware of it's existence, so they can start to ask for it? Why isn't EAA doing more to see that this fuel gets produced and made available? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 29 | February 3rd 08 07:04 PM |
82UL Fuel | floater | Piloting | 9 | May 26th 06 10:17 AM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |