![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I bought a FM wireless transmitter to rebroadcast stuff from my PC
around the house. The only frequency I could find was 104.1 that was clear without a station. But all of a sudden, now when I am broadcasting my stuff, I pick up planes instead. How can this be? I know it is from planes, as I hear words like "Southwest", etc. Without my transmitter on, all I hear is static on 104.1 but when I turn on my transmitter, the planes seem to over ride my signal. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
104.1 FM is below the aircraft navigation and below the
communication assigned frequencies. But there are harmonic signals that you cheap FM transmitter is not screening out. Are you using a wired connection from the PC to the FM transmitter or a WiFi or other radio? Most likely you're getting the interference in that way. You may be in violation of FCC rules. "rb" wrote in message ups.com... |I bought a FM wireless transmitter to rebroadcast stuff from my PC | around the house. The only frequency I could find was 104.1 that was | clear without a station. But all of a sudden, now when I am | broadcasting my stuff, I pick up planes instead. How can this be? I | know it is from planes, as I hear words like "Southwest", etc. Without | my transmitter on, all I hear is static on 104.1 | but when I turn on my transmitter, the planes seem to over ride my | signal. | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What Jim said. In addition, aviation communication uses amplitude
modulation, not FM. You are getting some kind of rogue hetrodyning. Bob Gardner "rb" wrote in message ups.com... I bought a FM wireless transmitter to rebroadcast stuff from my PC around the house. The only frequency I could find was 104.1 that was clear without a station. But all of a sudden, now when I am broadcasting my stuff, I pick up planes instead. How can this be? I know it is from planes, as I hear words like "Southwest", etc. Without my transmitter on, all I hear is static on 104.1 but when I turn on my transmitter, the planes seem to over ride my signal. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"rb" wrote in message
ups.com... I bought a FM wireless transmitter to rebroadcast stuff from my PC around the house. The only frequency I could find was 104.1 that was clear without a station. But all of a sudden, now when I am broadcasting my stuff, I pick up planes instead. How can this be? I know it is from planes, as I hear words like "Southwest", etc. Without my transmitter on, all I hear is static on 104.1 but when I turn on my transmitter, the planes seem to over ride my signal. I can't speak for your specific situation. But generally, you've got a couple of things going on: frequency harmonics mean that you can get signal on different frequencies from that actually used by airplanes, and the fact that airplane radios use AM mean that you don't need to even be on a harmonic frequency (the AM radio station next to our house produces audible, intelligible signals on practically any electronic device that has amplification). I discovered, once I started using an FM transmitter with my MP3 player in the car, that once my FM transmitter is turned off, the car radio will pick up the ATIS broadcast on the frequency I'm using for the FM transmitter (107.3...but I doubt it matters much). That said, I would be surprised if you are picking up transmissions from airplanes themselves. I wouldn't expect their transmitters to be powerful enough, nor close enough to you to produce a signal you can hear on your FM receiver. It seems more likely to me that you are near a ground-based station, with its relatively higher transmitting power, and are hearing that side of the conversation. The fact that it occurs only when your transmitter is actually turned on suggests to me that the interference is actually in the transmitter itself, especially if you see the same behavior in all of your receivers. Probably there's some amplifier circuit somewhere in the transmitter that is picking up the interference, which is then transmitted normally to each receiver. Why this would override your intended signal in the transmitter, I don't know...seems like it should be in addition to, rather than instead of (at least that's been my experience with the interference from our neighbor's AM radio station). But as I've also found with our various interference issues, the exact manifestation of the interference can vary widely from device to device (another reason that, if you are seeing the same behavior in a variety of receivers, the interference is more likely affecting the transmitter, since otherwise I wouldn't expect every receiver to be interfered with in exactly the same way, assuming they aren't all of exactly the same design). We do have a couple of people who read this newsgroup who are very experienced electronics engineers and who may be able to offer more specific advice once they've read your post. However, you are not actually dealing with an aviation issue here...you're actually asking about a radio electronics issue, and as such you are likely to get better information from a newsgroup dedicated to that topic, rather than aviation. The one piece of information that you can get here that may be useful is the range of aviation frequencies: they are from 118Mhz to 136Mhz (there are navigation radios, on which some voice communications can occasionally occur, from 108Mhz to 118Mhz, but I doubt these are what you're dealing with), and as I mentioned before they use AM for the signal. Hope that helps. Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:AVTtg.67782$ZW3.26133@dukeread04... [...] You may be in violation of FCC rules. Assuming he's using an off-the-shelf device intended for the use in which he's applying it, that's extremely doubtful. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Macklin, I like you, you are a nice guy. But sometimes you give advice that
is way the hell out of your depth. Like this one. "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:AVTtg.67782$ZW3.26133@dukeread04... 104.1 FM is below the aircraft navigation and below the communication assigned frequencies. But there are harmonic signals that you cheap FM transmitter is not screening out. Are you using a wired connection from the PC to the FM transmitter or a WiFi or other radio? Most likely you're getting the interference in that way. You may be in violation of FCC rules. Probably not, with a store-boughten transmitter. And harmonics (which are integral multiples of a fundamental signal) probably have little to do with it. Consider the most probable cause. An FM receiver at 104.1 has a local oscillator at 114.8 MHz to produce an IF of 10.7 MHz. Not only will that beat with 104.1 on the low side of the LO, it will beat with 125.5 on the high side. Most FM receivers have at least a +/- 50 kHz. wide IF strip to allow the stereo subcarrier at 38 kHz. to come through, so 125.45, 125.5, and 125.55 will come through as well. The OP said that he doesn't get any interference when his transmitter is off, so my best place to start looking is the front end of the receiver, where the normal filtering of any decent FM receiver should take care of the "image" problem. However, when a very strong signal (like from a 100 mW legal transmitter) comes blowing into the front end of the receiver from a few feet away, crossmod and intermod are NOT your friend, and no designer in this world can make a brick wall filter that will take care of it. Having said all that, the real problem is to keep whatever small amount of aircraft band com energy is present at the front end from getting into the receiver. And, before we start off on a wild goose chase, I'd advise the OP to get a small handheld aircraft band transceiver or scanner and see if the real transmitter is somewhere around 125.5 MHz.. It is always good to be able to do a math calculation to see exactly what is getting into what before spending a lot of time chasing your tail. For those who say "you can't hear AM on an FM receiver", I say horsefeathers. It may be reduced in volume, it may be distorted, but it will get through. Do the test, tell me what frequency from 118-136.975 MHz. the aircraft is on, and we'll go from there. Jim |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Jul 2006 14:05:42 -0700, "rb"
wrote in . com:: now when I am broadcasting my stuff, I pick up planes instead. Does this occur with other FM receivers, or just one? How far away is the local airport from your location? Is there a line-of-sight path to the control tower from your location? Try putting a 0.1 mfd capacitor cross the power supply output terminals of your FM transmitter. You can also try winding the power cord around a ferrite doughnut. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If he is broadcasting and his power is above the proper
legal range, he MAY be in violation. He should be sure the FM transmitter he has, has an FCC number and is not causing any interference with the neighbors. "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:AVTtg.67782$ZW3.26133@dukeread04... | [...] | You may be in violation of FCC rules. | | Assuming he's using an off-the-shelf device intended for the use in which | he's applying it, that's extremely doubtful. | | |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What did I say that was wrong [other than the typo you
should have been your]. The comment about FCC rules...they do frown on transmitting or retransmitting the wrong signals. BTW, back in the 1974 period I gave a student a night dual x-c from Tulsa to OKC and back one night. We picked up several TV stations on the old AM radios in the C150 we were flying. So bad radios, that do not have properly working filters and signal rejection can do strange things. We also had fun with CB radios in our cars back in the late 60's, parking outside a church or at the drive-in movie and being able to have our comments come over the PA system. Poor shielding let our 5 W CB radio get into their amp. Some times you give criticism that isn't helpful. In my old age, I do make misteaks [mistakes] and often brake rules [break] because I sometimes remember the wrong bit of information. And sometimes I'm right [correct] by accident. mine..."| "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:AVTtg.67782$ZW3.26133@dukeread04... | 104.1 FM is below the aircraft navigation and below the | communication assigned frequencies. But there are harmonic | signals that you[r] cheap FM transmitter is not screening out. | Are you using a wired connection from the PC to the FM | transmitter or a WiFi or other radio? Most likely you're | getting the interference in that way. | | You may be in violation of FCC rules. | -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... | Macklin, I like you, you are a nice guy. But sometimes you give advice that | is way the hell out of your depth. Like this one. | | | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:AVTtg.67782$ZW3.26133@dukeread04... | 104.1 FM is below the aircraft navigation and below the | communication assigned frequencies. But there are harmonic | signals that you cheap FM transmitter is not screening out. | Are you using a wired connection from the PC to the FM | transmitter or a WiFi or other radio? Most likely you're | getting the interference in that way. | | You may be in violation of FCC rules. | | Probably not, with a store-boughten transmitter. And harmonics (which are | integral multiples of a fundamental signal) probably have little to do with | it. | | Consider the most probable cause. An FM receiver at 104.1 has a local | oscillator at 114.8 MHz to produce an IF of 10.7 MHz. Not only will that | beat with 104.1 on the low side of the LO, it will beat with 125.5 on the | high side. Most FM receivers have at least a +/- 50 kHz. wide IF strip to | allow the stereo subcarrier at 38 kHz. to come through, so 125.45, 125.5, | and 125.55 will come through as well. | | The OP said that he doesn't get any interference when his transmitter is | off, so my best place to start looking is the front end of the receiver, | where the normal filtering of any decent FM receiver should take care of the | "image" problem. However, when a very strong signal (like from a 100 mW | legal transmitter) comes blowing into the front end of the receiver from a | few feet away, crossmod and intermod are NOT your friend, and no designer in | this world can make a brick wall filter that will take care of it. | | Having said all that, the real problem is to keep whatever small amount of | aircraft band com energy is present at the front end from getting into the | receiver. | | And, before we start off on a wild goose chase, I'd advise the OP to get a | small handheld aircraft band transceiver or scanner and see if the real | transmitter is somewhere around 125.5 MHz.. It is always good to be able to | do a math calculation to see exactly what is getting into what before | spending a lot of time chasing your tail. | | For those who say "you can't hear AM on an FM receiver", I say | horsefeathers. It may be reduced in volume, it may be distorted, but it | will get through. | | Do the test, tell me what frequency from 118-136.975 MHz. the aircraft is | on, and we'll go from there. | | Jim | | |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:54:56 -0700, "RST Engineering"
wrote in :: The OP said that he doesn't get any interference when his transmitter is off, so my best place to start looking is the front end of the receiver, where the normal filtering of any decent FM receiver should take care of the "image" problem. However, when a very strong signal (like from a 100 mW legal transmitter) comes blowing into the front end of the receiver from a few feet away, crossmod and intermod are NOT your friend, and no designer in this world can make a brick wall filter that will take care of it. So, you're saying, that although the aviation AM radio energy is not being transmitted by the local MP3 FM transmitter, the receiver's front (RF amplifier) is so overwhelmed by the local MP3 FM transmitter's signal, that it enables aviation AM radio energy to directly enter the receiver through cross-modulation and inter-modulation? Did I understand you correctly? Isn't there also a possibility that nearby aviation AM radio energy is entering the local MP3 FM transmitter through the power lines (or transmitting antenna), and causing it to retransmit that aviation content in addition to the MP3 content? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Home Built | 78 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Owning | 77 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
Radio Interference Information | Ross Richardson | Piloting | 0 | October 17th 03 02:06 PM |
Ham Radio In The Airplane | Cy Galley | Owning | 23 | July 8th 03 03:30 AM |