![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's a new membership-based discussion forum that's been active for about
a month now. It's at http://www.cessna-pilots.com Membershp is free, although most of the users expect some type of fee in a year or so. There are close to 500 members registered at this point. You don't have to own a Cessna, but you'll probably get better mileage from reading the posts if you do. There are separate discussion forums for each type of Cessna (172, 182, 300-series, etc.), general maintenance, piloting, etc. I have no principal stake in this website - I am just a plain 'ol member who enjoys increasing my type-specific knowledge. Carl |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's a new membership-based discussion forum
I don't understand the advantage of such a forum over Usenet (except maybe OT postings, which I can skip). Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
There's a new membership-based discussion forum I don't understand the advantage of such a forum over Usenet (except maybe OT postings, which I can skip). Jose Actually I don't quite understand why there are so many 'private' discussion groups, for all kinds of products and applications, some where you even have to pay. I can understand this where membership is controlled due to sensitive or private information, but for the vast majority of these groups anyone can join just by sending an email to majordomo. May be they are afraid of a wider audience, or stage fright. May be this is also why some specify 'no-archive' on their usenet postings. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually I don't quite understand why there are so many 'private'
discussion groups... Yanno... if Usenet didn't exist, and somebody just invented it, it would be considered a great advance, like podcasting. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Aug 2006 19:56:58 -0700, "Andrew Sarangan"
wrote in . com: for the vast majority of these groups anyone can join just by sending an email to majordomo. There is are differences between groups that require its members to join, and Usenet. The group moderator has the ability to oust what s/he considers "disruptive" members at the expense of limited exposure. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:17:55 GMT, Jose
wrote in : Yanno... if Usenet didn't exist, and somebody just invented it, it would be considered a great advance, like podcasting. Due to Usenet's lack of a central controlling authority, the government would probably attempt to prevent its implementation out of fear. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote: Actually I don't quite understand why there are so many 'private' discussion groups, for all kinds of products and applications, some where you even have to pay. I can understand this where membership is controlled due to sensitive or private information, but for the vast majority of these groups anyone can join just by sending an email to majordomo. May be they are afraid of a wider audience, or stage fright. May be this is also why some specify 'no-archive' on their usenet postings. If it is moderated, you won't get the off-topic thread drift and flames. This would seem to make it a more "civilized" forum. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is are differences between groups that require its members to
join, and Usenet. The group moderator has the ability to oust what s/he considers "disruptive" members at the expense of limited exposure. There are also moderated Usenet groups. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jose wrote: There's a new membership-based discussion forum I don't understand the advantage of such a forum over Usenet (except maybe OT postings, which I can skip). Then you're the only one. The Cessna Pilots Assoc maintains a web board that easily gets 10 times the posts that this group gets. If there's something you want to know about your Cessna that's the place to go. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
further on that, having been a member of the cessna pilots assn. for a
few months, since i bought my 172-c, i've found there are real serious benifits to paying the very cheap dues. they have a staff of tech experts, a huge database and archive, well produced monthly glossy magazine and on and on. seems there have been personal conflicts and affronts (about which i know nothing and really care less) as a result of which there was formed the other group comprised of wonderfully nice, extremely experienced experts to be sure. no resources but excellent people as best i can tell. just my opinion but it seems that if the second group is wildly successful then the first group will not be able to afford to keep up the tech resources which would be a huge loss for cessna owners worldwide. i don't really see that happening as we have a less than 500 person free sign-up group on one hand and a fee paid membership of many, many thousands on the other. it was people on this group who suggested i check out the c.p.a. when i bought and that was excellent advice. i would strongly advise any cessna owner to pay and participate in the cessna pilots assn. it costs me about an hour of avgas. as long as it's free i also enjoy checking the threads at the other group sometimes. dan Newps wrote: Jose wrote: There's a new membership-based discussion forum I don't understand the advantage of such a forum over Usenet (except maybe OT postings, which I can skip). Then you're the only one. The Cessna Pilots Assoc maintains a web board that easily gets 10 times the posts that this group gets. If there's something you want to know about your Cessna that's the place to go. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Wow - heard on the air... (long) | Nathan Young | Piloting | 68 | July 25th 05 06:51 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Cessna 150-152 club forum crisis | avqpilot | Owning | 2 | August 16th 03 03:46 AM |