A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Grunau Baby versus Eta?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 3rd 06, 11:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,345
Default Grunau Baby versus Eta?

Just kidding.

Move along, nothing to see here.

Bob K.

  #2  
Old November 4th 06, 02:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default Grunau Baby versus Eta?

On Nov 3, 6:55 pm, "Bob Kuykendall" wrote:
Just kidding.

Move along, nothing to see here.

Bob K.


Hey ! SHouldn't you be in the shop ?
See ya, Dave

  #3  
Old November 4th 06, 02:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Udo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 132
Default Grunau Baby versus Eta?


wrote:
On Nov 3, 6:55 pm, "Bob Kuykendall" wrote:
Just kidding.

Move along, nothing to see here.

Bob K.


Hey ! SHouldn't you be in the shop ?
See ya, Dave

No, he is just coming up for air.
Have fun
Udo

  #4  
Old November 4th 06, 03:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tony[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40
Default Grunau Baby versus Eta?

All the Baby needs is a weak day and it will knock the pants off the
Eta!

Go crappy gliders!

Udo wrote:
wrote:
On Nov 3, 6:55 pm, "Bob Kuykendall" wrote:
Just kidding.

Move along, nothing to see here.

Bob K.


Hey ! SHouldn't you be in the shop ?
See ya, Dave

No, he is just coming up for air.
Have fun
Udo


  #5  
Old November 4th 06, 09:29 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bruce Greef
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 62
Default Grunau Baby versus Eta?

Tony wrote:
All the Baby needs is a weak day and it will knock the pants off the
Eta!

Go crappy gliders!

Udo wrote:

wrote:

On Nov 3, 6:55 pm, "Bob Kuykendall" wrote:

Just kidding.

Move along, nothing to see here.

Bob K.

Hey ! SHouldn't you be in the shop ?
See ya, Dave


No, he is just coming up for air.
Have fun
Udo



There is no such thing as a crappy glider.

There are state of the art super ships, and high performance racers, and
dependable club planes and gracefully ageing classics and collectable vintage.

Derelicts are just an opportunity to convert into one of the above. ;-)

Bruce
Owner of a well used , gracefully ageing shiny Cirrus - 36 years old and still a
thing of beauty - and it can out climb many of those top racers too. Some
advantages to lower wing loading, even if they disappear at warp speed when the
wings roll level...
  #6  
Old November 6th 06, 10:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
kirk.stant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,260
Default Grunau Baby versus Eta?


There is no such thing as a crappy glider.

There are state of the art super ships, and high performance racers, and
dependable club planes and gracefully ageing classics and collectable vintage.

Derelicts are just an opportunity to convert into one of the above. ;-)

Bruce
Owner of a well used , gracefully ageing shiny Cirrus - 36 years old and still a
thing of beauty - and it can out climb many of those top racers too. Some
advantages to lower wing loading, even if they disappear at warp speed when the
wings roll level...


1. Totally agree - old gliders are neat, have character, are usually
painted in neat colors...

2. In a real world "stay up" contest, I think low sink rate will often
trump low wing loading. My money would be on the Eta...

3. A well flown Cirrus is tough to stay with in a thermal!

Finally, 4. You don't know till you try - so everybody should launch
more often on weak days or early in the day and find out! There is
nothing like an hour of grinding around below pattern altitude to
sharpen one's thermalling skills - especially with a little wind to
make it interesting!

66

  #7  
Old November 7th 06, 12:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Graeme Cant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 79
Default Grunau Baby versus Eta?

kirk.stant wrote:
There is no such thing as a crappy glider.


1. Totally agree - old gliders are neat, have character, are usually
painted in neat colors...


These may have been on ras before but I think they're great:
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0643997/M/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0643999/M/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0643775/M/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0635155/M/
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0643773/M/

GC
  #8  
Old November 7th 06, 05:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Derek Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default Grunau Baby versus Eta?

A few years ago a gent from Hus Bos was leading the
UK National Ladder (equivalent to the OLC) for a month
or two flying a Slingsby Tutor, which has even worse
performance than the Grunau Baby. A lot of hot glass
ship owners were really shown up by this!

Unfortunately the powers that be (glass ship owners?)
then changed the rules of the ladder to make a repeat
of this situation almost impossible! However it shows
what can be done in vintage gliders if you put your
mind to it.

Derek Copeland


At 12:06 07 November 2006, Graeme Cant wrote:
kirk.stant wrote:
There is no such thing as a crappy glider.


1. Totally agree - old gliders are neat, have character,
are usually
painted in neat colors...






  #9  
Old November 7th 06, 05:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Derek Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default Grunau Baby versus Eta?

A few years ago a gent from Hus Bos was leading the
UK National Ladder (equivalent to the OLC) for a month
or two flying a Slingsby Tutor, which has even worse
performance than the Grunau Baby. A lot of hot glass
ship owners were really shown up by this!

Unfortunately the powers that be (glass ship owners?)
then changed the rules of the ladder to make a repeat
of this situation almost impossible! However it shows
what can be done in vintage gliders if you put your
mind to it.

Derek Copeland

At 12:06 07 November 2006, Graeme Cant wrote:
kirk.stant wrote:
There is no such thing as a crappy glider.


1. Totally agree - old gliders are neat, have character,
are usually
painted in neat colors...





  #10  
Old November 7th 06, 05:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
kirk.stant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,260
Default Grunau Baby versus Eta?


Derek Copeland wrote:
A few years ago a gent from Hus Bos was leading the
UK National Ladder (equivalent to the OLC) for a month
or two flying a Slingsby Tutor, which has even worse
performance than the Grunau Baby. A lot of hot glass
ship owners were really shown up by this!

Unfortunately the powers that be (glass ship owners?)
then changed the rules of the ladder to make a repeat
of this situation almost impossible! However it shows
what can be done in vintage gliders if you put your
mind to it.


Yep, a glider (or a pilot) that flies is going to beat one that doesn't
every time! Or like we used to say in the fighter business, "Hamburger
in any wrapper is still hamburger"!

Cheers
66

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Being Awake And Staying Awake - versus - Being Told "You Need Sleep!" {HRI note 20060907} Koos Nolst Trenite Piloting 27 September 10th 06 06:40 PM
Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods: Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue Mike Naval Aviation 26 July 11th 06 11:38 PM
"zero" versus "oscar" versus "sierra" Ron Garret Piloting 30 December 20th 04 08:49 AM
Fly Baby Plans Off the Market Ron Wanttaja Home Built 9 June 6th 04 02:45 PM
Tire talc...baby powder? No Spam Owning 12 August 8th 03 05:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.