![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-- snip --
Otherwise the Wankel, besides having small size which allows a narrow fuselage, has excellent power density and vibration free smoothness. The Wankel is also remarkably reliable and trouble free. The lack of vibration means that stuff doesn't crack, break or fall off the motor and things nearby - - a major positive attribute as compared to most 2-strokes. -- snip -- What are fuel consumption ratios for 4-stroke, 2-stroke, wankel; and typical engine weight ratios ? I expect the wankel to be lightest and thirstiest, so that up to a certain duration threshold its combined engine + fuel is better/lighter. == Chris Glur. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no-top-post wrote:
-- snip -- Otherwise the Wankel, besides having small size which allows a narrow fuselage, has excellent power density and vibration free smoothness. The Wankel is also remarkably reliable and trouble free. The lack of vibration means that stuff doesn't crack, break or fall off the motor and things nearby - - a major positive attribute as compared to most 2-strokes. -- snip -- What are fuel consumption ratios for 4-stroke, 2-stroke, wankel; and typical engine weight ratios ? I expect the wankel to be lightest and thirstiest, so that up to a certain duration threshold its combined engine + fuel is better/lighter. The 4 stroke piston engine is most fuel efficient, followed by the rotary Wankel, and finally the 2 stroke piston engines; at least, for the engines used in our gliders. The Wankel has four phases (intake, compression, power, exhaust) like a 4 stroke piston engine, but "stroke" doesn't seem to apply to a rotary engine! Maybe a good term is "4 phase"? I don't know how the weights compare, but if you consider the entire propulsion system (motor plus starter, muffler, etc, the mast and propeller, fuel, pumps, lines, and fuel tanks, starting battery, engine controls and wiring, and all the structural additions to a glider to carry the motor, a few pounds variation in basic engine weights is probably irrelevant. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly "Transponders in Sailplanes" on the Soaring Safety Foundation website www.soaringsafety.org/prevention/articles.html "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASH 26E VS DG 808C | [email protected] | Soaring | 63 | November 2nd 06 06:33 PM |