![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Must have been a slow news day in NYC - so the Times decided to pull a sensation piece out of the drawer to take up some column space. It begins like this : NEW YORK - From the windows that usually provide sweeping views of Manhattan in his 27th floor condominium, Gene Weisberger saw flaming debris - and on the street below, a crowd gaping upward. It continues with the plight of the Wiesbergers, and the fact they had not been evacuated, but told by firefighters to just stay put. "We felt so alone," he said. Some, like the Weisbergers, have questioned emergency protocols. They claim a building employee and at least one firefighter told them to stay put.After several minutes of uncertainty, Gene decided they should flee down a narrow stairwell despite some serious handicaps: He had a severe back condition after a decade of fighting cancer; Lila had a chronically bad hip and was barely on her feet after recent knee replacement. They said each step was excruciating. Lila said she willed herself to get out of the apartment by repeating a line from the poem "The Summer Day" by Mary Oliver: "Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?" Well, I'm glad the poem helped, but certainly the fact that they were never in any significant danger may have also played a role! I'm not criticizing them - I can imagine they were scared, but the journalist should be reprimanded for manipulation and exploitation - certainly they were told to stay put because the professionals at the scene understood the danger they faced was far less than what they would incur by trying to flee, given their physical condition. That they chose to ignore this advice is not something to be held against them, but one cannot in fairness say they were given incorrect advice, and they certainly put themselves at greater risk by ignoring the professionals' advice. But all low-blows are permitted when there's an opportunity to slam general aviation in the interest of selling some copy. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Winds A Factor In Lidle Crash | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 72 | November 10th 06 08:43 PM |
Lidle crash: who is wrong? | Blasto | Piloting | 57 | October 20th 06 08:05 AM |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 05:58 PM |