![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark Levin" wrote in message
As was pointed out to me the Beechcraft Baron does not use contra-rotating propellers. A bit of research showed me that most U.S. built light twins do not use them either. My question is why? Cost has been pointed out, however the Piper Navajo Chieftain has counter-rotating props (as opposed to contra-rotating) and no one mentions that they didn't buy a Chieftain because of the extra cost. The internal engine parts that differ from each side are well stocked by parts suppliers and therefore differ little in price from each other. Not mentioned by other posters is that stability in twins can be affected by which way the props rotate. The P-38 Lightning and Ted Smith Aerostar are examples of this. Counter-rotate the props one way and get better performance at the cost of stability. Turn the props in the opposite direction and get better stability at the cost of performance. D. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 120 | December 5th 06 12:49 AM |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | RomeoMike | Piloting | 6 | December 2nd 06 01:47 AM |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 6 | December 2nd 06 01:41 AM |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Newps | Piloting | 0 | November 30th 06 07:40 PM |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Greg Farris | Piloting | 0 | November 30th 06 07:25 PM |