![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The cost of manufacturing two versions of the engine and
recertification of the design is not worth the small advantage. Most light twins were designed and certified over 40 years ago. "Mark Levin" wrote in message ... | Hello, | | As was pointed out to me the Beechcraft Baron does not use contra-rotating | propellers. A bit of research showed me that most U.S. built light twins do | not use them either. | | My question is why? | | It seems silly to me not to take advantage of having various propeller | effects cancel each other out unless there were overriding engineering or | cost issues. | | For single engine operations it seems that you would want to match rotation | to which side the engine is on so as to let propeller caused turning | tendencies to help offset the asymmetrical thrust. Though I can imagine | that asymmetrical thrust is so much greater than propeller caused turning | tendencies that this isn't really an issue. | | Are the added engineering/manufacturing/maintenance issues for | contra-rotating props that great? | | inquiring minds | ml |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 120 | December 5th 06 12:49 AM |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | RomeoMike | Piloting | 6 | December 2nd 06 01:47 AM |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Newps | Piloting | 0 | November 30th 06 07:40 PM |
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers | Greg Farris | Piloting | 0 | November 30th 06 07:25 PM |
The light bulb | Greasy Rider | Military Aviation | 6 | March 2nd 04 12:07 PM |