![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some will find this reference interesting. An underlying assumption
for the patent seems to be the airplane is in coordinated flight. Isn't that an uncomfortable assumption for most of you -- slips along a straight track would go undetected as banks, wouldn't they? United States Patent 5451963 Link to this Page: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5451963.html Abstract: An apparatus for determining the bank angle of a moving aircraft includes a receiver for receiving navigational signals from NAVSTAR/GPS satellites in orbit about the earth, a signal processor for demodulating the satellite navigational signals, an arrangement for determining aircraft speed based on the navigational signals, an arrangement for determining the rate of change of the aircraft track heading from the navigational signals, an arrangement for determining the bank angle of the moving aircraft from the aircraft speed and the rate of change of track heading wherein the aircraft bank angle is inversely proportional to the aircraft speed and directly proportional to the rate of change of track heading. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 6:40 am, "Tony" wrote:
Some will find this reference interesting. An underlying assumption for the patent seems to be the airplane is in coordinated flight. Isn't that an uncomfortable assumption for most of you -- slips along a straight track would go undetected as banks, wouldn't they? United States Patent 5451963 Link to this Page:http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5451963.html Abstract: An apparatus for determining the bank angle of a moving aircraft includes a receiver for receiving navigational signals from NAVSTAR/GPS satellites in orbit about the earth, a signal processor for demodulating the satellite navigational signals, an arrangement for determining aircraft speed based on the navigational signals, an arrangement for determining the rate of change of the aircraft track heading from the navigational signals, an arrangement for determining the bank angle of the moving aircraft from the aircraft speed and the rate of change of track heading wherein the aircraft bank angle is inversely proportional to the aircraft speed and directly proportional to the rate of change of track heading. Your turn coordinator is the same too. If you are uncoordinated you could be in a bank and show level on the TC. Probably why the ball is on the instrument. Staying coordinated is important in the clouds. -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony" wrote in message oups.com... Some will find this reference interesting. An underlying assumption for the patent seems to be the airplane is in coordinated flight. Isn't that an uncomfortable assumption for most of you -- slips along a straight track would go undetected as banks, wouldn't they? Apperently current GPS's have a turn and bank indicator on them and they work OK. But, I would like to see quantifiable data on the effect of uncorrdinated flight and the effect of winds on this. I am thinking coordinated flight errors will be smaller than wind errors. It take a HUGE slip to generate a standard rate turn. Danny Deger |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony" wrote in message oups.com... Some will find this reference interesting. An underlying assumption for the patent seems to be the airplane is in coordinated flight. Isn't that an uncomfortable assumption for most of you -- slips along a straight track would go undetected as banks, wouldn't they? I recall recently helping somebody on this newsgroup with the maths to work this out. Given that differential GPS is supposed to be accurate within cm I would have thought that it would be possilbe to have GPS sensors on the end of the wings , and the nose and tail for that matter to provide information about the attitude of an aircraft that would be independant of whether the aircraft was coordinated or not. . Or perhaps the cm accuracty only applies in the horizontal plane? terry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
d&tm writes:
Given that differential GPS is supposed to be accurate within cm I would have thought that it would be possilbe to have GPS sensors on the end of the wings , and the nose and tail for that matter to provide information about the attitude of an aircraft that would be independant of whether the aircraft was coordinated or not. . Or perhaps the cm accuracty only applies in the horizontal plane? The accuracy is primarily lateral. However, this exact method is used on some vehicles in order to determine their orientation in space at all times. Obviously, it works very well on aircraft carriers, somewhat less so on large aircraft, and so-so on tiny aircraft. But it still works in any case. Even a handheld GPS will show a change in coordinates as you move it from one outstretched arm to the other. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
d&tm wrote:
"Tony" wrote in message oups.com... Some will find this reference interesting. An underlying assumption for the patent seems to be the airplane is in coordinated flight. Isn't that an uncomfortable assumption for most of you -- slips along a straight track would go undetected as banks, wouldn't they? I recall recently helping somebody on this newsgroup with the maths to work this out. Given that differential GPS is supposed to be accurate within cm I would have thought that it would be possilbe to have GPS sensors on the end of the wings , and the nose and tail for that matter to provide information about the attitude of an aircraft that would be independant of whether the aircraft was coordinated or not. . Or perhaps the cm accuracty only applies in the horizontal plane? Is the patent applicant the guy who works/ed for NASA that was giving out papers on this subject several years ago in the NASA Pavillion at Oshkosh? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like a solution in need of a problem...
-Dana On 6 Feb 2007 06:40:22 -0800, "Tony" wrote: Some will find this reference interesting. An underlying assumption for the patent seems to be the airplane is in coordinated flight. Isn't that an uncomfortable assumption for most of you -- slips along a straight track would go undetected as banks, wouldn't they? United States Patent 5451963 Link to this Page: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5451963.html Abstract: An apparatus for determining the bank angle of a moving aircraft includes a receiver for receiving navigational signals from NAVSTAR/GPS satellites... -- -- If replying by email, please make the obvious changes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Question Authority and the authorities will question you! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Feb 2007 06:40:22 -0800, "Tony" wrote in
.com: United States Patent 5451963 Link to this Page: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5451963.html Abstract: An apparatus for determining the bank angle of a moving aircraft includes a receiver for receiving navigational signals from NAVSTAR/GPS satellites in orbit about the earth, The full text of the patent is available he http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...&RS=PN/5451963 Inventors: Lempicke; Thomas A. (Rock Hill, SC) Appl. No.: 08/249,803 Filed: May 26, 1994 It seems Mr. Lempicke has another more recent patent also: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...&RS=PN/5841370 US Patent Issued on November 24, 1998 5841370 Method and apparatus for determining aircraft bank angle using satellite... An apparatus for determining the bank angle of an aircraft and method includes a receiver for receiving navigational signals from NAVSTAR/GPS satellites in orbit about the earth, a signal processor for demodulating the satellite navigational signals, an arrangement for determining a sensitivity... 1998-11-24 I wonder why I was never taught that " ... winds can cause lateral forces to affect the aircraft turning movement, tending to slip the aircraft sideways." From the summary: An aircraft turns by banking which is caused by oppositely deflecting ailerons. As the aircraft turns in a banking manner, the pilot requires some visual indicator of the aircraft banking attitude to coordinate the turn, maintain the desired course and to safely operate the aircraft. The banking attitude is the aircraft bank angle or angle of bank. Bank angle indicators are common instrumentation in an aircraft and are sometimes combined with a bubble/level device to form a combined instrument known as a turn coordinator. The display associated with this device gives the pilot necessary information regarding performance of a coordinated turn. As the aircraft turns, winds can cause lateral forces to affect the aircraft turning movement, tending to slip the aircraft sideways. The rudder may be moved in correcting response to lateral forces causing the aircraft to slip. The lateral forces are displayed on the turn coordinator using the bubble-type device similar to a carpenter's level. However, it is the bank angle which actually defines the extent and rate of the turn in coordination with aircraft speed. Current bank angle indicators or turn coordinators are based on gyroscopes and use the precession of the gyroscope in combination with a correction factor to determine bank angle. The bank angle is displayed on the turn coordinator using a tilting aircraft silhouette. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
A Level 1 AOA clarification | Ramapriya | Piloting | 64 | January 9th 05 01:19 AM |
Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 29th 03 10:01 PM |
Coordinated turning stall and spins | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 20 | November 18th 03 08:46 PM |
Lift and Angle of Attack | Peter Duniho | Simulators | 9 | October 2nd 03 10:55 PM |