![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Got a demo flight in a new Skylane Saturday morning. Very nice airplane.
The G1000 stuff was a bit bewildering at first but otherwise it flew just like any good 182... ....except for one thing: it trued 147 knots! Non-turbo at 5,500 feet, 10 deg. C OAT, 135 KIAS. Wow! That is 10 knots faster than my buddy's 1980 model. The guy who runs the FBO that rents it ($190/hr) says their other Skylane is just as fast. He said changes Cessna made to the cowl and wheel pants starting in 2005 make the difference. The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. Oh, yeah, one other difference I noticed: the view forward is much better than in older 182s, a combination of new glare shield and seat designs, I suppose. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:38:32 -0600, "Dan Luke"
wrote: The guy who runs the FBO that rents it ($190/hr) says their other Skylane is just as fast. He said changes Cessna made to the cowl and wheel pants starting in 2005 make the difference. The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. FWIW, I routinely plan 141TAS at 15gph in a 2004 182S. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12-Feb-2007, "Dan Luke" wrote:
The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. My suspicion is that part of the increased cruise speed is the result of aerodynamic improvements and part is due to higher power setting (maybe about 85%?), as evidenced by the much higher fuel flow -Elliott Drucker |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan Luke wrote: The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. Why the high fuel flow? My 285hp IO-520 book fuel flow is 15.2 at 75%. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 12, 11:38 am, "Dan Luke" wrote:
Got a demo flight in a new Skylane Saturday morning. Very nice airplane. The G1000 stuff was a bit bewildering at first but otherwise it flew just like any good 182... I got a demo ride in the SR22 and Columbia 400 last year. Like you, I was behind the curve a bit with the Avidyne & G1000 panels (and I fly an EFIS equipped Pilatus) The capabilities are pretty amazing, once you read through the (lengthy?) ops manual The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. What pwr & mixture setting? EGTs? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...it trued 147 knots! Non-turbo at 5,500 feet, 10 deg. C OAT, 135 KIAS. ... The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. The '67 182K I fly typically trues a good bit slower (~120), but I get much better fuel burn. I'm typically burning about 12.5 gph at that altitude. Lessee... 422nm trip @ 147 knots and 15.5 gph = 2.9 hours and $200 (no wind and 100LL @ $4.50/gal). Same trip @ 120 kt & 12.5 gph = 3.5 hr and $197. Three dollars to buy 30 minutes? Tempting deal. My real question is: What power setting were you guys using? I'm usually in the 65-70% range during cruise. -- John T http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://openspf.org ____________________ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote: Dan Luke wrote: The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. Why the high fuel flow? My 285hp IO-520 book fuel flow is 15.2 at 75%. That's not much difference. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kingfish" wrote: On Feb 12, 11:38 am, "Dan Luke" wrote: Got a demo flight in a new Skylane Saturday morning. Very nice airplane. The G1000 stuff was a bit bewildering at first but otherwise it flew just like any good 182... I got a demo ride in the SR22 and Columbia 400 last year. Like you, I was behind the curve a bit with the Avidyne & G1000 panels (and I fly an EFIS equipped Pilatus) The capabilities are pretty amazing, once you read through the (lengthy?) ops manual The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. What pwr & mixture setting? EGTs? 23" & 2300 rpm, IIRC. The mixture was 25 deg. ROP. Didn't check the EGTs. I wish I'd looked at the CHTs. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 12, 12:48 pm, "Dan Luke" wrote:
"Newps" wrote: Dan Luke wrote: The bad news is that we were burning 15.5 GPH to get that speed. Why the high fuel flow? My 285hp IO-520 book fuel flow is 15.2 at 75%. That's not much difference. It is if the new 182s still have only 235 HP. Dan |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John T wrote:
Three dollars to buy 30 minutes? Tempting deal. How much does thirty extra minutes on your tach cost you? If you make those sorts of trips often it adds up to more maintenance dollars for ADs, more hours on the airframe when you sell, parts weraing out quicker and getting closer to TBO. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
faster 182? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 26 | February 21st 07 02:40 PM |
Jeppesen USB Skybound Faster? | Marco Leon | Owning | 9 | September 18th 04 03:49 AM |
Looking At RAS Faster | B. Iten | Soaring | 10 | April 6th 04 10:21 PM |
Why small radius collects ice faster? | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 13 | March 25th 04 04:38 PM |
How much faster w/o slats? | [email protected] | Home Built | 7 | February 7th 04 03:47 PM |