![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() FAA: FUNDING TIED TO MODERNIZATION The FAA must implement changes to the way it is funded before it can afford to embrace the myriad technologies that are envisioned for the Next Generation Air Transportation System, according to senior FAA staffers. Appearing before the Senate aviation subcommittee (http://commerce.senate.gov/public/in...ing_ID=1 837), Charles Leader, director of the Joint Planning and Development Office, told committee members that the controversial system of user fees and tax increases now under consideration by Congress for FAA reauthorization is a key element of FAA modernization. "Modernization and moving to NextGen is inextricably linked to changes in the FAA's financing system," Leader said. "We need to establish the financing of our current and future operations based on actual costs and investment requirements that will realize tangible benefits and increasing efficiency." This is Bush double-speak for, "We need to wrest fiscal oversight away from Congress, because The Reason Foundation and Bowing told us so, and we will have to fund both the existing ATC/NAS systems, AND the NextGen development and implementation for several years (decades?)." General aviation groups and even the Government Accountability Office -- have dismissed the need for a wholesale change in the way the FAA is funded, saying there's plenty of money available under the current system of ticket and cargo taxes and the existing fuel tax levied on GA aircraft. http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#194772 That's because they don't buy-in to the idea of abandoning Congressional oversight of FAA spending, and they see the enormous increase in the expense of collecting the funds if the existing system is abandoned in favor of fee-based funding. Each operation will have to be billed and accounted for. It's such a bogus proposal, that it should be laughed right out of Congress. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:36:07 GMT, Larry Dighera wrote:
saying there's plenty of money available under the current system of ticket and cargo taxes and the existing fuel tax levied on GA aircraft. That's saying a lot given the FAA's talent for setting fire to the money they were supposed to use to modernize the system. -- Dallas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities | Mike | Naval Aviation | 2 | November 30th 05 01:50 AM |
"Tactical Aircraft Modernization: Issues for Congress" | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 28th 05 02:52 PM |
"Military Helicopter Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress" | Mike | Rotorcraft | 0 | September 28th 05 02:50 PM |
Delco unit tied to Chinook | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 20th 04 10:11 PM |
airbrake position while tied outside | CK | Soaring | 18 | January 19th 04 02:34 PM |