![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have a cessna 150 with 150 HP conversion. I burn regular mogas for
the most part. My bird can tanker up to 60 gallons so I have very long range capability. The plane runs fine on the mogas not to mention the SAVINGS! Avgas here is running as much as 5 bucks a gallon! car gas runs about $ 2.45 gal Since the airplane is gravity feed ( the engine has a engine driven fuel pump) could I have a problem with vapor lock?? What would be the indications of the lock? at what point could i expect vapor lock?? start up? takeoff!!! ??? Thanks!! By the way the 150/150 is AWSOME it kicks ass and takes names on takeoff and cruise with the long range can stay in the air almost 10 hours sipping the MOGAS with regular cessna 150 100 HP cruise power ( 95 KTS ) or 6 hrs with pushing the power up till 120 KTS 9.5 gal hr I Have the E/ I electronic flow meter coupled with the KLN 90 GPS and I can set the fuel flow right on the nut!!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wise purchaser wrote:
Have a cessna 150 with 150 HP conversion. I burn regular mogas for the most part. My bird can tanker up to 60 gallons so I have very long range capability. Wow, even with mogas you double the value of the aircraft by filling up :-) The plane runs fine on the mogas not to mention the SAVINGS! Avgas here is running as much as 5 bucks a gallon! car gas runs about $ 2.45 gal It actually runs better on mogas. 100LL is not particularly low in lead compared to anything other than the 100/130 it replaced. It's got 4 times the lead that the old 80 grade did. Since the airplane is gravity feed ( the engine has a engine driven fuel pump) could I have a problem with vapor lock?? What would be the indications of the lock? at what point could i expect vapor lock?? start up? takeoff!!! ??? You're not likely to see it. One of the criteria for getting that STC is to flight test for the conditions condusive to vapor locking. Most commonly they are high ambient temperatures and very low fuel flow rates, low pressures. In my plane (not approved for avgas) the worst case is a hot day, shutting down for 30minutes and letting the fuel boil inside the lines not moving and then try to restart. Can't vouch for 150/152's but the 172 does have a small locking problem which was responsible for the suggestion at high altitudes that you use LEFT or RIGHT rather than both to increase the fuel flow rate. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
You're not likely to see it. One of the criteria for getting that STC is to flight test for the conditions condusive to vapor locking. Most commonly they are high ambient temperatures and very low fuel flow rates, low pressures. In my plane (not approved for avgas) the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ah, er, don't you have a typo there, Ron? I thought you had converted your Navion to some flavor of 550. To the the best that I know, all such engines are approved for avgas. If anything I would say that they are not approved for autofuel. -- Frank Stutzman Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl" Hood River, OR (soon to be Boise, ID) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Stutzman wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote: You're not likely to see it. One of the criteria for getting that STC is to flight test for the conditions condusive to vapor locking. Most commonly they are high ambient temperatures and very low fuel flow rates, low pressures. In my plane (not approved for avgas) the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ah, er, don't you have a typo there, Ron? I thought you had converted your Navion to some flavor of 550. To the the best that I know, all such engines are approved for avgas. If anything I would say that they are not approved for autofuel. There are two STC's required for running on mogas - one for the engine, one for the airframe. No Navion is STC'd to run on mogas. Rip |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Stutzman wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote: You're not likely to see it. One of the criteria for getting that STC is to flight test for the conditions condusive to vapor locking. Most commonly they are high ambient temperatures and very low fuel flow rates, low pressures. In my plane (not approved for avgas) the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ah, er, don't you have a typo there, Ron? I thought you had converted your Navion to some flavor of 550. To the the best that I know, all such engines are approved for avgas. If anything I would say that they are not approved for autofuel. Ooops...that should say not approved for mogas. I don't know if their are *ANY* planes not approved for MOGAS. There are no Navions, regardless of engine, that are approved for AVGAS. The EAA doesn't get into anything other than 4-cyl I believe. Petersen at one point test flew a Navion and it failed the tests. They couldn't tell me what engine or fuel system (the Navion has probably over a dozen different combinations AS IT CAME FROM THE FACTORY, not withstanding those put on by STC) was the one tested and failed. Yes the IO-550 is right out anyway. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
Ooops...that should say not approved for mogas. I don't know if their are *ANY* planes not approved for MOGAS. ARGH! that should say AVGAS. My brain is turning to cottage cheese, large curd. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Natalie" wrote in message ... : Ron Natalie wrote: : : Ooops...that should say not approved for mogas. I don't know if their : are *ANY* planes not approved for MOGAS. : : ARGH! that should say AVGAS. : : My brain is turning to cottage cheese, large curd. Low fat...or regular? ;-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Vapour lock is seldom an issue with gravity-feed systems, since the fuel is under positive pressure (though very low positive pressure). Vapour lock happens most often when the fuel is beling pulled rather than pushed, as in a low-wing with the tanks below the engine's fuel pump. The lowered pressure on the fuel in the lines lowers its boiling point, and the heat in the cowl does the rest. Mogas in a gravity-fed system can be a problem at altitude, since the atmospheric pressure is low, and the fuel's boiling point comes down. If the engine is working hard and the ambient temp is high enough, the heat in the cowl might raise the fuel to the lowered boiling point. As the fuel boils, the vapours expand and prevent any further fuel flow. Carburetors and fuel injectors don't work well on vapours. Mogas has a higher vapour pressure than avgas, which means its boiling point will also be lower. We used to run mogas in our O-200s and O-320s. The Continentals didn't like it, and the valves would stick and the valve seats would wear out sooner. The old-technology bronze valve guides relied on the lead for lubrication, and so did the valve heads and seats. The Lycomings gave somewhat less trouble, but we still had exhaust valve guide wear and valve burning problems with it. Whwn the guide wears, it lets the valve hit the seat a little off-center and makes the seat wear to an oval, allowing it to leak and burn. The problems went away when we went to straight 100LL. Today's automobiles have much more advanced valve technology that allows them to burn the harsher mogas. The ContinentoLycosaurus prefers the diet it's been on since it was born in prehistoric times. Running a mix of 100LL and mogas didn't work much better than straight mogas. Sometimes these economy measures are false and end up costing more in the long run. We run a flight school, and besides the cost of expensive cylinder repairs, which is bad enough, the downtime eats into the budget real quick. 100LL is much cheaper for us. Dan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're going to get vapor lock running mogas, spring is probably the
time it'll happen. Oil companies formulate mogas for different seasons. Winter mogas has a low vapor pressure which allows it to vaporize more easily in lower temperatures. Summer blends have a higher vapor pressure to resist vapor lock in warmer temperatures. The problem exists when using a winter blend of mogas when temperatures have warmed up. If you're going to get vapor lock, that's when it's most likely to happen. It's not a problem in cars, since a typical gas station turns over its stock one or more times a week. It can be a problem if you get your mogas from an airport. It can take weeks or months to turnover a full load of fuel. This was a problem with a friend of mine that runs an FBO in the southwest. He used to have a self-serve mogas pump at his relatively small airport, and it would take him a couple of months to sell a 2,000 gallon load of it. Invariably, when the hot weather hit, he would get reports of vapor lock from pilots who were buying his winter mogas. Eventually, he considered it too much of a potential liability and shut down the mogas pump. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Blueskies" wrote)
: My brain is turning to cottage cheese, large curd. Low fat...or regular? Expiration date? Montblack Best if used befo 10pm |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Linden Accident - Question about "Droop Lock" | Bob Chilcoat | Rotorcraft | 6 | October 6th 05 11:11 AM |
Two Lock Rule? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 62 | June 16th 05 05:00 AM |
Cherry Lock | Rich | Home Built | 0 | March 20th 05 11:33 PM |
Vapor Lock | Dale | General Aviation | 3 | August 8th 04 03:50 PM |
Ubisoft Lock On. | Pilot Pete | Simulators | 3 | January 26th 04 03:54 AM |