![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() We have an interesting debate going on about the performance of the Curtiss Hawk 75 fighter in an simulator. The debate has gone on for some months while the research has been done in aviation museums and the guys have pondered on the differences between American factore numbers, French numbers and Finnish flight test numbers about the fighter's performance. Looks like we're getting to the finals now. WOuld anyone take a look at the following web page and give comments whether the discussion and conclusions about the (real) aircraft performance, engine etc seem truthful / correct? Or are there any clear problems visible to you? http://www.byterapers.com/~grendel/m...shawk75debate/ jok |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Curtiss Pusher Model D | Home Built | 12 | February 22nd 18 10:50 PM | |
Performance Comparison Sheet | Ed Baker | Home Built | 6 | December 2nd 04 02:14 AM |
Kitty Hawk Bound -- Posters and Such | Jim Weir | Home Built | 2 | December 1st 03 04:56 AM |
Kitty Hawk Tickets? | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 7th 03 03:20 AM |
Arming Global Hawk Draws Conflicting Comments From Pentagon | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 5 | July 14th 03 08:51 PM |