![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ballast dump times are usually nothing but a reasonable guess so I
decided to measure them. Put a Discus CS wing on the standards (horizontal) and filled her up. Times are for one wing thus double the volume for real life and with vent holes as in flight. 20L: 73 seconds 40L: 105 seconds 60L: 150 seconds That'll be 4.4, 8.8 and 13.2 gallons Measuring the tail tank showed a strange result; dumping 2L took about 80/90 seconds but dumping 4L took over 10 minutes with only significant dumping when the scotch from the "4L" and "3L" marks were removed. With the scotch on the vent holes there was barely any dumping though the upper two vent holes were definitely open. A club member suggested that the water was polluted a bit and that using fresh drinking water should solve this. I decided however that I won't use tail ballast. But then that's easy to say if you're only 60 kg's I guess ;-) Hope this'll be usefull for some people. J. Nieuwenhuize. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "J. Nieuwenhuize" wrote in message oups.com... Ballast dump times are usually nothing but a reasonable guess so I decided to measure them. Put a Discus CS wing on the standards (horizontal) and filled her up. Times are for one wing thus double the volume for real life and with vent holes as in flight. 20L: 73 seconds 40L: 105 seconds 60L: 150 seconds That'll be 4.4, 8.8 and 13.2 gallons Measuring the tail tank showed a strange result; dumping 2L took about 80/90 seconds but dumping 4L took over 10 minutes with only significant dumping when the scotch from the "4L" and "3L" marks were removed. With the scotch on the vent holes there was barely any dumping though the upper two vent holes were definitely open. A club member suggested that the water was polluted a bit and that using fresh drinking water should solve this. I decided however that I won't use tail ballast. But then that's easy to say if you're only 60 kg's I guess ;-) Hope this'll be usefull for some people. J. Nieuwenhuize. I gather you dumped the water on the ground during this test. The pressure on the dump valves in flight varies with speed of the glider. View this video the water from the high pressure of the under wing works back up into the low pressure http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...22228558&hl=en At high speed we have started dumping at 50 km out and still had water coming out after landing. www.mals.net |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 8:20 pm, "Mal" wrote:
I gather you dumped the water on the ground during this test. The pressure on the dump valves in flight varies with speed of the glider. I agree with Mal. On ground dump times may be interesting but they may not be representative of in flight dump times. The only way to know dump time at thermalling speed, as for a low save, is to measure it in that condition. Similarly the only way to know dump time on a fast final glide is to measure it in that condition. I created a dump time graph for my 19b and taped it in the cockpit. I ran a stop watch during a dump and could adjust the glide computer to the new weight for a partial dump. I even considered building a simple counter triggered by microswitches on the dump valves. Of course I thought that function should be built into the glide computer. As I got older I found other things to worry about. Andy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mal" wrote in message ... "J. Nieuwenhuize" wrote in message oups.com... Ballast dump times are usually nothing but a reasonable guess so I decided to measure them. Put a Discus CS wing on the standards (horizontal) and filled her up. Times are for one wing thus double the volume for real life and with vent holes as in flight. 20L: 73 seconds 40L: 105 seconds 60L: 150 seconds That'll be 4.4, 8.8 and 13.2 gallons Measuring the tail tank showed a strange result; dumping 2L took about 80/90 seconds but dumping 4L took over 10 minutes with only significant dumping when the scotch from the "4L" and "3L" marks were removed. With the scotch on the vent holes there was barely any dumping though the upper two vent holes were definitely open. A club member suggested that the water was polluted a bit and that using fresh drinking water should solve this. I decided however that I won't use tail ballast. But then that's easy to say if you're only 60 kg's I guess ;-) Hope this'll be usefull for some people. J. Nieuwenhuize. I gather you dumped the water on the ground during this test. The pressure on the dump valves in flight varies with speed of the glider. View this video the water from the high pressure of the under wing works back up into the low pressure http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...22228558&hl=en At high speed we have started dumping at 50 km out and still had water coming out after landing. www.mals.net Maybe someday I'll solve the mystery of how 2 liters of water gets into the nose of my Nimbus 2C when dumping ballast. All possible tubes are plugged and the under seat area and around the wheel box is always dry. The only wet area is the foot wells. Bill Daniels |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe someday I'll solve the mystery of how 2 liters of water gets into the
nose of my Nimbus 2C when dumping ballast. All possible tubes are plugged and the under seat area and around the wheel box is always dry. The only wet area is the foot wells. Bill Daniels- Bill- Sounds like a pee tube problem. Try "Depends." Mark |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Maybe someday I'll solve the mystery of how 2 liters of water gets into the nose of my Nimbus 2C when dumping ballast. All possible tubes are plugged and the under seat area and around the wheel box is always dry. The only wet area is the foot wells. Bill Daniels- Bill- Sounds like a pee tube problem. Try "Depends." Mark A quite predictable response, Mark. My 'capacity' is quite a bit less than 2 liters. No, it's really ballast water and despite 3 years of searching, I can't find any route for it to get there. For a while I thought it might somehow be sucked forward inside the rudder cable guide tubes but they were dry each time I checked.. There are several unused static ports but the associated tubes are plugged with golf tees. All other tubes go to instruments. The only clue is that dumping at high airspeed makes the problem worse. Bill Daniels |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Bill,
try a lipstick camera in the footwell. It may take a few flights, progressively moving the camera "upstream" when the flow source is found. Bagger |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With the Jantar Std 3 that I used to fly, which had water dumps under the
wing, when dumping at high speed I used to get water trickling forward past my elbows and find a small pool of water under the rudder pedals after the flight. I never really managed to work out how it got into the fuselage either. "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote in message . .. Maybe someday I'll solve the mystery of how 2 liters of water gets into the nose of my Nimbus 2C when dumping ballast. All possible tubes are plugged and the under seat area and around the wheel box is always dry. The only wet area is the foot wells. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dump valve for Ls4a | Robert Harvey | Soaring | 0 | November 20th 05 08:47 PM |
Schemp Hirth water ballast dump valves | tango4 | Soaring | 14 | September 2nd 04 07:13 PM |
Discus CS and Duo Discus Wing Inspections | Nolaminar | Soaring | 0 | October 24th 03 01:15 AM |
[LBA] Schempp-Hirth - Discus bT - Discus | Frederic FUCHS | Soaring | 0 | September 17th 03 08:42 AM |
What is this? An ammo dump? | TooPlaneCrazy7 | Military Aviation | 3 | August 10th 03 01:29 AM |