Zzzzzoom in Zzzzzero Gravity

This round apparently goes to Zoom.

Whether through guile, bluster, bluff ...or genuine journalistic
stick-to-itiveness, Zoom was the we were not. He deserves an "atta boy."

A question:
What are his ANN numbers?

Also:
What do those numbers mean?


Mont-black-hole

In article , Montblack says...

This round apparently goes to Zoom.

Whether through guile, bluster, bluff ...or genuine journalistic
stick-to-itiveness, Zoom was the we were not. He deserves an "atta boy."

A question:
What are his ANN numbers?

Also:
What do those numbers mean?

He may have been there but something he wrote in his article about the flight
might have given it away. He said some people paid to observe the flight .I bet
he bought his way on because if he was part of the crew I'm sure he would have
worn a neat jump suit like the real crew members. I noticed that none of the
photos in flight were credited to him so I doubt he was the official
photographer.

I bet it was guile,bluster, bluff and money for a ticket that got zoom there :-)
But he'll never get an atta boy from me ...He's still a phoney .

Another thing he said was he'll be test flying a rocket plane in the near future
....Wanna bet?? LOL!!!


Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article , Montblack says...
This round apparently goes to Zoom.

Whether through guile, bluster, bluff ...or genuine journalistic
stick-to-itiveness, Zoom was the we were not. He deserves an "atta boy."

A question:
What are his ANN numbers?

Also:
What do those numbers mean?

He may have been there but something he wrote in his article about the flight
might have given it away. He said some people paid to observe the flight .I bet
he bought his way on because if he was part of the crew I'm sure he would have
worn a neat jump suit like the real crew members. I noticed that none of the
photos in flight were credited to him so I doubt he was the official
photographer.

I bet it was guile,bluster, bluff and money for a ticket that got zoom there :-)
But he'll never get an atta boy from me ...He's still a phoney .

Another thing he said was he'll be test flying a rocket plane in the near future
...Wanna bet?? LOL!!!


Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

I wonder if it's too late to have him test a V1.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Notice the way he posts photos of the flight, and of Hawking in a
horizontal position in zero gravity, and the notice under the picture
would lead you to believe that he is posting a copyright of the photo.
See what it actually says, he is not copyrighting the photo, it says,
"Portions Copyright © 1999-2007 by Aero-News Network, Inc. All rights
reserved." Whatever "Portions" means, escapes me.

The same photo appears in the gozerog.com website and credit is shown as
zero gravity.

The other day I thought I found some photos that were credited to the
Orlando Sentinal or something like that and they were surprisingly
similar, I dare not say identical, to photos on the ANN website.

Sure does make a person wonder??

"Dan" wrote in message
...
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article , Montblack says...
This round apparently goes to Zoom.

Whether through guile, bluster, bluff ...or genuine journalistic
stick-to-itiveness, Zoom was the we were not. He deserves an "atta
boy."

A question:
What are his ANN numbers?

Also:
What do those numbers mean?

He may have been there but something he wrote in his article about the
flight
might have given it away. He said some people paid to observe the flight
.I bet
he bought his way on because if he was part of the crew I'm sure he would
have
worn a neat jump suit like the real crew members. I noticed that none of
the
photos in flight were credited to him so I doubt he was the official
photographer.

I bet it was guile,bluster, bluff and money for a ticket that got zoom
there :-)
But he'll never get an atta boy from me ...He's still a phoney .

Another thing he said was he'll be test flying a rocket plane in the near
future
...Wanna bet?? LOL!!!


Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

I wonder if it's too late to have him test a V1.


I think watching him loop, roll, and spin a Natter would be more
interesting...


Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Kyle Boatright wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article , Montblack says...
This round apparently goes to Zoom.

Whether through guile, bluster, bluff ...or genuine journalistic
stick-to-itiveness, Zoom was the we were not. He deserves an "atta
boy."

A question:
What are his ANN numbers?

Also:
What do those numbers mean?
He may have been there but something he wrote in his article about the
flight
might have given it away. He said some people paid to observe the flight
.I bet
he bought his way on because if he was part of the crew I'm sure he would
have
worn a neat jump suit like the real crew members. I noticed that none of
the
photos in flight were credited to him so I doubt he was the official
photographer.

I bet it was guile,bluster, bluff and money for a ticket that got zoom
there :-)
But he'll never get an atta boy from me ...He's still a phoney .

Another thing he said was he'll be test flying a rocket plane in the near
future
...Wanna bet?? LOL!!!


Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

I wonder if it's too late to have him test a V1.


I think watching him loop, roll, and spin a Natter would be more
interesting...

With cockpit audio

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Timothy Sinclair" wrote

For the last time:

James Campbell was not on board Stephen Hawking's zero-g flight.

And for the third time, tell us of how you come to have this information, or
nobody will find your statement credible.
--
Jim in NC

"Timothy Sinclair" wrote in message
...
Chuck S Wrote:

He may have been there but something he wrote in his article about the
flight
might have given it away. He said some people paid to observe the flight
.I bet
he bought his way on because if he was part of the crew I'm sure he would
have
worn a neat jump suit like the real crew members. I noticed that none of
the
photos in flight were credited to him so I doubt he was the official
photographer.

I bet it was guile,bluster, bluff and money for a ticket that got zoom
there :-)
But he'll never get an atta boy from me ...He's still a phoney .

Another thing he said was he'll be test flying a rocket plane in the near
future
...Wanna bet?? LOL!!!


Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret


For the last time:

James Campbell was not on board Stephen Hawking's zero-g flight.

- Tim

And, for at least the 3rd time, what is your basis for this statement?
Either it is first hand, second hand, or third hand information. Without
some providing some attribution, most of the folks following this thread
will be skeptical, despite the fact that many would enjoy seeing Zoom caught
in another embellishment/fabrication/lie/whatever.

KB

In article , Timothy Sinclair says...

Chuck S Wrote:

He may have been there but something he wrote in his article about the flight
might have given it away. He said some people paid to observe the flight .I bet
he bought his way on because if he was part of the crew I'm sure he would have
worn a neat jump suit like the real crew members. I noticed that none of the
photos in flight were credited to him so I doubt he was the official
photographer.

I bet it was guile,bluster, bluff and money for a ticket that got zoom there :-)
But he'll never get an atta boy from me ...He's still a phoney .

Another thing he said was he'll be test flying a rocket plane in the near future
...Wanna bet?? LOL!!!


Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret


For the last time:

James Campbell was not on board Stephen Hawking's zero-g flight.


Tim I hope your right so how do you know? and how did zoom get in the news
photos and videos?? If you have proof he wasn't there I among others would love
to see it :-)

Chuck S

Dan wrote:

I wonder if it's too late to have him test a V1.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


THAT would be a Weapon of Mass Deception.

- John Ousterhout -
rah/14, I've been sued!
http://ousterhout.net