![]()  | 
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. | 
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
As my news server doesn't let me post to a.b.p.aviation, this is the 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	next best place I can think of for this reply. In answer to a question about pictures of the SR-71 showing a shock wave, several people have responded saying that the SR-71 is not supersonic at low level. Looking for confirmation, I found this URL http://www.wvi.com/~lelandh/exec12.jpg - a page from "The SR-71 Reconnaissance System Executive Handbook", written by Bill Majors (Lockheed ADP), which gives the performance envelope of the SR-71. And yes, it is subsonic to about 20,000 feet.  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Performance Comparison Sheet | Ed Baker | Home Built | 6 | December 2nd 04 03:14 AM | 
| A36 performance Figures | Anthony Acri | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | December 1st 04 08:55 PM | 
| High performance homebuilt in the UK | NigelPocock | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 09:35 PM | 
| CUrtiss Hawk 75 performance debate | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 3 | July 16th 03 11:45 AM |