A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Which of these is cheating?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 8th 06, 06:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.students
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Which of these is cheating?

Lately I have modified my flying methods in the sim in ways that seem
to produce better results, but I don't know if I'm learning to do
things correctly or simply acquiring bad habits. I want to make sure
that I don't "cheat" too much when flying.

For example, lately I've had a tendency to adjust climb or descent
rates (and altitude to a lesser extent) by making thrust adjustments,
rather than changes in pitch. I seem to recall someone telling me
that this was legitimate, but now I can't find the reference.

Anyway, on approach in particular, I've been using the throttle to
adjust descent rate rather than pitch, the reasoning being that
changing pitch just shifts inertia to a different place, from which it
will return at some point, nullifying the effect of the change in
pitch. For example, if I just point the nose down to descend towards
the airport, airspeed increases, and as soon as I ease off the yoke
I'm climbing again. If I try to climb with pitch, my airspeed drops,
and so I end up descending again shortly thereafter.

So I figure that if I reduce thrust, I reduce lift and inertia, so any
loss of altitude will be durable (unless I increase thrust again). If
I increase thrust, I add lift and inertia, and I climb. Is this the
way I'm supposed to be doing it?

In a related vein, I was wondering how legitimate it is to lower flaps
just for the sake of increasing drag, at low speeds? Lately I've had
a tendency to lower flaps not so much to increase lift on approach,
but just to slow the aircraft down and absorb inertia (which in turn
increases my descent rate). I use flaps much later in the small Baron
than I would in a 737. Once I lower them, I maintain altitude with
increased throttle. I get the feeling that I'm in a more stable
configuration with full flaps and a higher throttle setting than I
would be with no flaps at a lower setting, although I'm not sure what
is giving me this impression.

I have tried to roll to fix runway alignment rather than just using
rudder. However, I still use the rudder when very close to the
runway. For example, if I'm slightly misaligned at 50-100 feet, I
will use some rudder and hold it in order to stay aligned as I touch
down. At higher altitudes, I try to roll into position instead.

I sometimes increase throttle in the last 100 feet or so above the
runway to make sure I don't get too close to a stall. I don't always
land with throttles idle, unless I'm only a few feet above touchdown
and there is no wind (which seems to be rare, if I'm using real-world
weather).

I have consistent problems getting properly aligned for landings
(although in some cases I'm simply too close when I turn to final, I
think). I also tend to be much too high when I come in. I have a lot
of trouble with patterns, turning to final, when I often discover that
I'm parallel to the runway but a quarter-mile off to the left or
right.

For some reason, it always seems that I start to drift out of
alignment in the last 100 feet above the runway. I don't know if this
is from surface-level winds or what. And, unfortunately, controllers
in the sim don't announce surface winds on take-off, even though I've
heard them do this in real life ("wind two seven zero at niner"), so I
have a hard time knowing the wind unless I check the sim or happen to
spy a windsock somewhere.

So, what mistakes am I making?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old October 8th 06, 06:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.students
Christopher Brian Colohan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default Which of these is cheating?

I think this book will answer all of your questions and more....

http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/a...lane_handbook/

It is to the point, easy to read, and best of all -- free.

If you want a printed version you can get it from any airport flight
supplies shop in the US for $15 or so.

Chris

Mxsmanic writes:

Lately I have modified my flying methods in the sim in ways that seem
to produce better results, but I don't know if I'm learning to do
things correctly or simply acquiring bad habits. I want to make sure
that I don't "cheat" too much when flying.

[snip...]
  #3  
Old October 8th 06, 07:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.students
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default Which of these is cheating?


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message

For example, lately I've had a tendency to adjust climb or descent
rates (and altitude to a lesser extent) by making thrust adjustments,
rather than changes in pitch. I seem to recall someone telling me
that this was legitimate, but now I can't find the reference.


In general, you're on the right track. Power is altitude; pitch is
airspeed.


  #4  
Old October 8th 06, 02:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.students
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Which of these is cheating?

Christopher Brian Colohan writes:

I think this book will answer all of your questions and more....

http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/a...lane_handbook/

It is to the point, easy to read, and best of all -- free.


Looks like a different one from the one I downloaded before. I'll
download it and take a look. Thanks.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #5  
Old October 8th 06, 02:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.students
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Which of these is cheating?

John Gaquin writes:

In general, you're on the right track. Power is altitude; pitch is
airspeed.


OK, thanks. So this is true in all configurations, or only during
certain phases of flight like an approach?

If I'm cruising, is it better to adjust throttles to maintain
altitude, or to set trim, or both, or what? The aircraft seems to
have a natural tendency to climb above a certain thrust setting, and a
natural tendency to descend below that setting (at exactly the right
setting, it will stay level). With full throttle, I have to trim by
2+ degrees to stay at the same altitude. If I use throttle to control
altitude, I can keep neutral trim, but sometimes I end up moving a lot
more slowly than the aircraft is capable of.

Which technique is the way that most real pilots actually use? It's
nice to get somewhere faster, but setting so much downward trim makes
me uneasy for some reason.

Is it ever appropriate to add power in a long turn in order to
maintain altitude?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #6  
Old October 8th 06, 02:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.students
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default Which of these is cheating?

I don't understand what you mean by "cheating".
In real life there is no "cheating". It's a question of flying safely and
with the appropriate amount of stress on the various components of your
airplane to balance the results (eg: most efficient flying to save money on
gas, or fastest possible flight without reducing engine life, etc).


Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Lately I have modified my flying methods in the sim in ways that seem
to produce better results, but I don't know if I'm learning to do
things correctly or simply acquiring bad habits. I want to make sure
that I don't "cheat" too much when flying.

  #7  
Old October 8th 06, 02:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Which of these is cheating?

John,

Power is altitude; pitch is
airspeed.


Hah! Let the religious wars begin.

Frankly, I have never quite understood the distinction, same as with "forward" and "side" slips.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)
M

  #8  
Old October 8th 06, 03:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Doug[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 248
Default Which of these is cheating?

Power is altitude and pitch is airspeed is not always true but the
grain of truth is this. Come down at 60, with power to give VSI of
200fpm. Now increase power and leave pitch alone. Your VSI decreases.

Conversly, pitch down, and your airspeed increases.

So for approaches its sorta true, although of course both power and
pitch influence both altitude and airspeed. It's all interelated.

  #9  
Old October 8th 06, 04:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.students
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default Which of these is cheating?


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message

OK, thanks. So this is true in all configurations, or only during
certain phases of flight like an approach?


Very few things are true in all configurations. Every time you want to
change an aircraft's configuration, you are adjusting a fine balance between
pitch and power. Usually, what you're seeking is stability. In general, a
more lasting, stable outcome will be achieved if you think of altitude
change in terms of power, and airspeed change in terms of pitch.


If I'm cruising, is it better to adjust throttles to maintain
altitude, or to set trim, or both, or what?


When setting up in cruise, do not drive the plane like most people drive a
car. You should start with a preplanned setting in mind: "I am going to
cruise at 2200 rpm and 21 inches". After you attain your altitude and
reduce to this power setting, you would then gradually trim the airplane so
it is flying level at that setting. Your speed will be what it is, plus or
minus a few knots indicated.


  #10  
Old October 8th 06, 08:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.students
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Which of these is cheating?

John Gaquin writes:

When setting up in cruise, do not drive the plane like most people drive a
car. You should start with a preplanned setting in mind: "I am going to
cruise at 2200 rpm and 21 inches". After you attain your altitude and
reduce to this power setting, you would then gradually trim the airplane so
it is flying level at that setting. Your speed will be what it is, plus or
minus a few knots indicated.


Is maintaining a specific altitude important under VFR, or is it okay
to drift over a broad range? I admit that I don't necessarily see a
compelling reason to fly at 6000 rather than 4000 (or vice versa) in
most cases, or anywhere in between.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cheating the ILS [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 6 September 3rd 06 04:22 PM
Cheating the Reaper! JJS Piloting 7 July 19th 06 03:34 PM
Blair Manipulated Intelligence to Justify War, says BBC film [email protected] Naval Aviation 4 March 22nd 05 06:45 PM
Date of effect now 1 April 2004 for revised IGC-approval for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder Ian Strachan Soaring 56 December 2nd 03 08:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.