![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not the plane, the airports.
The Washington DC area airports KCGS, KVKX and W32 operate with additional security requirements as specified under SFAR 94. I was going through those requirements to understand what I have to do to land at CGS. I'm not really asking about that, I'll go through that journey and report back. It looks to be a real pain and seems to be another manifestation of pointless bureaucracy from the Department of Homemade Security. The real point of this post is how silly the additional security procedures are and how they are left in place to provide the appearance of additional security without actually delivering on that promise. I just drove my daughter down to school. She starts college in DC next week, a sure sign of my aging. Beyond the emotional trauma of that life milestone, I had to wonder what that flight would be like. So I did my flight planning only to come across this SFAR 94 restriction. I'd much rather fly the 320 or so miles than transit the NJ Turnpike ever again. But this time I had to drive. After going through the area on route 95 just past College Park you really get an appreciation for how pointless it is to single out light aircraft in these restrictions. Nothing big is getting in or out of CGS, it is only 2600' of runway. So this SFAR is really directed at the small, light aircraft flown by the GA community. As I was driving along on the bottom of the ADIZ I couldn't help to think how silly it is, as giant semis hauling heaven knows what whizzed along without restriction hurtling within miles of downtown DC. It is all so silly. KC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|