![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to make several samples of materials for covering my plane,
(plywood, composite, ceconite, etc....) And I would like to find the difference with some kind of scale or pressure meter to find the breaking points. Has anyone done this? Lou |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Is this for structural or non-structural covering? Each of the listed material have significant differences in their properties, so the use really needs to be defined first. The intended use is going to help define what materials you can use and in what grades or forms or thickness, or orientations. For example, composites for structural applications are going to be laid up and reinforced one way, so that they take the designed loads without failure, while those parts that are things like fairings, hatches ect. are going to be done another way. A good example is my Fairchild. It uses ceoconite as a structural cover in some places, but others, it is used as a surface protector. Same material, but completely different uses and application methods. Craig C. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well,,,,,,,,,,, at this point I'll have to say half and half.
The plans call for plywood over the ribs of the wings, structural. the other parts are to cover the fuselage but the strutural is taken care of on the inside. Lou |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the fuselage, I'd stick with either aircraft or marine grade ply
for glue strength between plies. If it's all flat areas, then 90 deg. layups are going to be the least expensive and should work fine. If there are curves then you are probably going to be limited to using aircraft grade with 45 deg layups. Do the prints give you any guidence on thicknesses to use for the various areas? If so, then there are tables out there that give the various strength data vs the number of plies vs the ply materials. They also give the testing method used to generate the data. For fabric, the Maule tester is the accepted method. Ply is done by tension and twist test if I remember correctly, coupled with steam testing of the bonding agent. Composite is done by tension, compression and impact tests. Tension and compression tests are reasonable easy to duplicate, impact can be done too, but is most likely going to be a bit more subjective without a decent lab setup. When in doubt, talk with the designer is the best advice. Unless there is a complete egineering workup with the design, that's about the only way to know why the particular material selections. Food for thought... Craig C. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lou" wrote in message oups.com... Well,,,,,,,,,,, at this point I'll have to say half and half. The plans call for plywood over the ribs of the wings, structural. the other parts are to cover the fuselage but the strutural is taken care of on the inside. Lou I did it with different fiberglass years ago. I made lay ups with different types and amounts of glass cloth. I cut my samples in 1" wide coupons and took them to a testing company simply chosen from the phone book. Since I didn't require any written reports with the test results, they did it extremely cheap. I think the pulled 8 coupons for $20, in about 1985. Roughly $40 today. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lou" wrote in message
ups.com... I want to make several samples of materials for covering my plane, (plywood, composite, ceconite, etc....) And I would like to find the difference with some kind of scale or pressure meter to find the breaking points. Has anyone done this? Lou See http://www.hpaircraft.com/hp-24/update_22_oct_07.htm for pictures of the "Break-A-Tron" -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That will break it, but will it measure?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 4:09 pm, Lou wrote:
That will break it, but will it measure? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyVD0FBLiFQ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:34:42 -0700, Lou wrote:
I want to make several samples of materials for covering my plane, (plywood, composite, ceconite, etc....) And I would like to find the difference with some kind of scale or pressure meter to find the breaking points. Has anyone done this? The problem is, what question are you really asking? In the labs we made coupons that tested tensile strength and elongation in different planes such as pull yield, compression and perpendicular to the surface. If it's shear then you have to define over what length. If it's a pressure yield, over what area and how is it distributed. Many labs have the equipment to do the tests, but the problem is defining what tests need to be done to display the pertinent results. IOW, what strength and in what plane/axis, or what information do you really need? Roger (K8RI) Lou |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:09:47 -0700, Lou wrote:
That will break it, but will it measure? Even then does it give results that are appropriate? It appears to give tensile strength in pull, but that is only indirectly related to aircraft skin strength. Roger (K8RI) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do static/probe based TE systems actually measure TE? | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 1 | April 29th 07 07:44 PM |
gps to measure feet? | brucrx | Piloting | 19 | November 13th 04 03:33 AM |
Flight physical | Slavko Vorkapitch | Piloting | 9 | October 6th 04 04:00 PM |
Vandalism, security measure, or something else? | Peter Duniho | Military Aviation | 25 | February 7th 04 05:53 AM |
Vandalism, security measure, or something else? | Peter Duniho | Piloting | 19 | February 7th 04 05:53 AM |